On 3/8/24 21:16, Craig Russell wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to understand if STeVe uses the Weighted Inclusive Gregory Method
(WIGM) which is described as best I can below. It seems to be the most popular
of the public election methods.
I understand that other methods are also in use: Meek's Method
On 3/2/24 00:22, sebb wrote:
As the subject says.
It's really disconcerting when trying to vote, especially if one does
not have sufficient time to complete all the votes in one session.
I've ended up having to vote multiple times to ensure every vote was
completed.
This really ought to be
On 2023-07-07 22:11, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 1:53 PM Craig Russell wrote:
Hi,
I'm serving on the Santa Clara County Citizens' Commission on Elections
and we're working to recommend settings for machines tabulating ranked
choice voting.
One of the settings deals with what to
On 17/08/2022 20.24, Phil Steitz wrote:
Hey all,
I have been using the stv plugin in Steve to run STV votes for
prioritization based on csv vote data that I get into the format needed by
the plugin. I have been able to get this to work, but only using the
"version 1" vote format which ends up
st rebuild the .git, and mark svn readonly.
Implied: happy to see svn become readonly today (and detach any sync'ing to
git). I doubt any of us wants to commit to svn in the next week or so.
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 5:52 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 06/03/2022 12.33, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 06/03/2022 18.43, sebb wrote:
The GitHub repo has been forcibly changed to track
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/steve/trunk
instead of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/steve/trunk/pysteve
This has invalidated all the forks, and broken all the PRs.
That is very discouraging for
On 06/03/2022 12.33, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi folks,
As per suggestion from Greg, I think we should keep the existing
steve.git repository but start a fresh main branch for the new code.
This would mean keeping the old subversion history in the trunk branch
for those interested.
We'd also
Hi folks,
As per suggestion from Greg, I think we should keep the existing
steve.git repository but start a fresh main branch for the new code.
This would mean keeping the old subversion history in the trunk branch
for those interested.
We'd also be putting the web site into this
On 28/02/2022 02.36, Greg Stein wrote:
It used to be in the CMS, but was removed last August:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/vpphnjqcklswvgy2h57h2bgmclwonoy4
We have not stood up a Pelican-based website (yet). The TLP server has been
detached from version control, so it displays a stale copy
Hi folks,
As we have some renewed interest in working on STeVe, this would also be
a good time to sort out some practicalities and names.
# Version control:
I think it would be a good move to switch to git for the next iteration.
Not because I'm a fan of git in particular, but because of the
[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE
DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS]
Hello Apache projects,
I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the
git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming
On 03/05/2018 09:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> It is time once again for the major test/use cycle
> for STeVe! I propose that we have the latest rev
> setup and we run some sample votes in time for
> us to fix bugs, add features, etc before the actual
> meeting.
>
> Daniel, could you get us an
One could argue that Apache Steve is the committee, and STeVe is the
product of that committee... *waves hand magically*
On 05/21/2017 01:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> Fixing CI would also fix derived data such as
>
> https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?steve
>
> On 20 May 2017 at 13:31, Greg
On 03/16/2016 07:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I don’t have time to contribute to Steve any more. I love what
> the team is doing but I am stepping down from the PMC.
>
> Thank you for believing that I could help the project.
With all the activity going on around STeVe
On 03/18/2016 09:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> One thing that the previous STV code had was that if
> the code running the election itself was changed, it
> invalidated the running election. This was to prevent
> someone from changing the software (say, by silently
> dropping 'AC' from the counts)
On 02/10/2016 01:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> AFAICT the file backend uses several files that are shared between users.
>
> However there does not appear to be any form of locking employed, so
> updates can be lost.
>
> If this is intentional, it should be clearly documented as a restriction.
>
I was
On 02/03/2016 08:41 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to information received we're approx. 2 months away from next ASF
> Member meeting. Should we not make members aware of
> https://vote-wip.apache.org/ and ask in the members ml for reviewer?
>
> That way we might become aware of
On 12/07/2015 03:50 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> The only thing I see at that url (https://vote-wip.apache.org/) is a big
> fat logo, which is nice...
>
> But it doesn't enable me to do anything obvious. Maybe I am missing
> something.
This is a BTW: Does this mean you'll be interested in helping
;
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/07/2015 03:50 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>> The only thing I s
On 12/08/2015 04:54 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [snip]
>
> P.S. There seems to be a disconnect between what Pierre and I are
> referring to as tests, and what you (Daniel) are referring to as
> tests. I would feel more comfortable if there were some automated
> unit tests.
>
Anyone can contribute
On 12/07/2015 03:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> I for one will start looking for new people to help out with this, as I
>> still think STeVe has a role to play, not just as an inte
On 12/07/2015 03:50 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> The only thing I see at that url (https://vote-wip.apache.org/) is a big
> fat logo, which is nice...
>
> But it doesn't enable me to do anything obvious. Maybe I am missing
> something.
>
It's working as intended :) The instructions on how to use
Hi folks,
this is yet another shout out to people who might be interested in
helping test pysteve in its current state, before we all panic close to
the annual meeting.
I am looking for 4-5 people to help test the functionality and user
interface (UX, intuitiveness etc) and fix any issues that
On 10/12/2015 02:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to step down as VP and I recommend Daniel as
> replacement.
>
> Comments or other suggestions/volunteers? Or can I go ahead
> and start the VOTE :) (I assume/hope that Daniel accepts!)
>
Should it come such a decision, I would both accept
Just wanted to share http://compliance.rocks/result.html?246e7325
Should we decide to release this at some point in the near future, it
looks like it's now perfectly ASF compliant :)
So that's good...
With regards,
Daniel.
aye aye - hereby posted :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-08-11 16:31, Jake Farrell wrote:
sounds good, thanks Daniel
-Jake
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:42 AM, ke...@apache.org wrote:
+1 to humbedooh
On 2015-08-11, at 6:56 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Our quarterly report is
HI folks,
I made a couple of changes to the STV method today:
- Fixed an issue wherein if no one was 'lowest', STV would break
- Set the random seed to actually be random now. Setting it to 0 is just
bad juju and can be reverse engineered to place candidates in such a way
that a tie will
On 2015-04-02 18:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 2, 2015, at 12:39 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Apr 2, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
HI folks,
I made a couple of changes to the STV method today:
- Fixed an issue wherein if no one was 'lowest
On 2015-03-29 20:16, Alan Cabrera wrote:
I was looking at our backend code and noticed that they are in charge of
generating the election hash. In my opinion I think the election hash should be
generated by the callers of the back end and not delegated to the back ends
themselves.
What
On 2015-03-30 17:10, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 30, 2015, at 3:17 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 2015-03-29 20:16, Alan Cabrera wrote:
I was looking at our backend code and noticed that they are in charge of
generating the election hash. In my opinion I think
Hullo folks,
as requested by the CouchDB project, I am in the middle of setting up a
VM for STeVe, managed by infra (that is, the machine is managed, the
software is for us to fix).
this will be running from pySTeVe's trunk for the time being, and any
PMC member who wishes to have access to
Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org
Reply-To: dev@steve.apache.org dev@steve.apache.org
Date: Saturday, March 28, 2015
On 2015-03-29 15:10, Greg Stein wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, humbed...@apache.org wrote:
...
+++ steve/trunk/pysteve/lib/backends/es.py Sun Mar 29 12:38:08 2015
...
+constants.appendBackend( {
+'id': 'elasticsearch',
+'init': init,
+'document_exists': exists,
+
On 2015-03-28 06:34, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 27, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 2015, at 7:07 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Right, so I went a bit on a rampage, so we now have:
- Single Transferable Vote
- Yes/No/Abstain
, that’s pretty cool!
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 27, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I just wanted to share some good news with you:
- pySTeVE now supports BOTH file-based DB as well as ElasticSearch as a backend!
There are a few kinks to sort out, but on the whole
Oh I plan to take a well-earned bit of rest now, so you can feel free to
start porting to flask etc ;)
I might fiddle with the JS and HTML, but I think on the whole, I've
added the features I was dying to add :)
There are still some odd ends left, but they require some more brain
power to
On 2015-03-26 20:13, Greg Stein wrote:
stv_tool.py was named with an underscore so that it is importable. You
shouldn't need to copy/paste all of its code ...
(tho of course, it doesn't live in lib/ ... maybe it should 'svn mv' into
lib?)
Hi Greg,
Yesterday was a long(ish) day for me, I got
Hi folks,
I just wanted to share some good news with you:
- pySTeVE now supports BOTH file-based DB as well as ElasticSearch as a
backend!
There are a few kinks to sort out, but on the whole, it seems to be
working smoothly.
feedback (especially if you can review the ES code) would be much
We already have ASF specific voting methods in pysteve,
adding more shouldn't be an issue, they are all plugins you can use or
not use.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-03-26 18:24, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
So I've now read through all of the archives for 2012, skipped 2013
and 2014, and read
Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Pierre,
patches for the site are most welcome.
You can use the CMS to check out the site source and make an anonymous
diff
righto, I'll remember that for next commit :)
With regards,
Daniel
On 2015-03-25 17:26, Pierre Smits wrote:
I have created an issue STEVE-19
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STEVE-19 for this kind of future
work.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services
.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Probably a plugin of sorts that would enable
On 2015-03-23 22:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Does it just dim it? People can vote more than once...
They can vote as many times as they like, that will just override their
previous vote.
This is just a helpful display tweak, it doesn't prevent anything.
Essentially, this just sets a hasVoted
Hi folks,
I have finished (mostly) working on an online admin interface to setup
and edit elections/issues for pytest.
You can visit an online demo at: http://demo.stv.website/admin (user:
admin, password: demo).
Feel free to browse around, add some issues, set up an election, delete
some
that collecting votes for a release is pertinent for
this project.
Yeah, I once looked at the STeVe code base contemplating how to support
release votes but gave up because it was too ambitious.
I'd be willing to chip in if I don't have to go it alone.
On Mar 20, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed
On 2015-03-22 21:23, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 22, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 2015-03-22 21:06, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 20, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Alan Cabrera l
or can find the old feathery
one, we can throw it into the vote, see which one people like, and then
whichever one wins, we'll be sure to put that in the repo so it doesn't
get lost. :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On Mar 19, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
HI folks, me
without [VOTE] threads. :-/
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 2015-03-19 21:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hrm... I thought we did have one, w/ the feathers creating the 'V' in
STeVE...
I have never seen any STeVe logo before, and I could not find anything
HI again folks,
I've been rewriting what I made for the current trunk of STeVe, and now
have working STV ballots in pytest (maybe I should rename it to
pysteve). I have yet to make a fully functional web interface for
editing elections, so I had to use the REST API manually to set up an
stv
Hi folks,
I was looking at Chris' REST API suggestions (still don't have wiki
karma ;( ) and it got me fiddling with some python CGI to start making
election and issue creation/editing available via the web. As it is now,
it's just a method for setting up an election and issues, as well as
.
On 2015-03-16 16:14, Jim Jagielski wrote:
randomize is a function in cmdline/steve.pm
On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, it's me again!
I tried my best to install steve locally to test out the interactive page, and
well...I got it working (hence the new
51 matches
Mail list logo
