Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I merged this into master and squashed the commits so I am closing the pull
request, but will leave the JIRA open so we can look into pulling it back into
1.x as well.
---
If your project is set up
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@harshach it has been 6 hours so I am going to check this in because I
don't want to have to try and keep it up to date as the code base changes. If
you do find anything as time goes on I will be ve
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@harshach I have +1 from enough people to merge this in and would really
like to move forward with it, but if you are still looking at it I want to be
sure you get a chance to finish. Please let me
Github user srdo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@revans2 Thanks, looks great. +1 for merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user ptgoetz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I have a few style-related nits, but I've refrained from pointing them out
because the style(s) in the codebase are all over the place, and the style is
inherited in some places. If we want to get ni
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
Not sure why travis has so many issues with the build and maven but here is
my travis setup on the same branch with the build passing.
https://travis-ci.org/revans2/incubator-storm/builds/160
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@srdo Pushed a new version that hopefully addresses your review comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@srdo on the `newAssignment.compareAndSet` you are 100% correct. I
originally had it in there to clear out the assignment when it is processed,
but then realized that each time a new assignment is
Github user ptgoetz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@revans2 I'm also in the process of reviewing this. I hope to finish by the
end of the day. So far everything looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@harshach did you get a chance to take a look yet?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
The Travis failures are from hive dependencies not being downloaded.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@revans2 Thanks for the great work. Really appreciated. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@HeartSaVioR I found the original comment and put it the change. I also
fixed some other review comments from @abellina and also fixed an annoying
failure with drpc_auth_test.clj not being able to b
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@harshach There's already an another pull request for fixing race condition
on old supervisor. Given that we can't set a due date for 2.0 (and maintenance
date for 1.x) it would be better to have
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@HeartSaVioR @harshach Once this goes in I would be happy to make a version
for 1.x
In fact we are in the process of pulling it back for the version we use
internally, and I was able to keep
Github user harshach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@HeartSaVioR do we want this for 1.x branch? Given that it's a java
migration and pretty much a new feature that can get into 1.x-branch. I would
rather keep 1.x-branch as it is.
@revans2 will g
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
And I saw some places using lambda which can't be applied to 1.x.
@revans2 Could you craft a pull request for 1.x branch (might also 1.0.x)
too when we're sure it's good to merge?
---
If yo
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I've left a comment of regression issue, but other manual tests passed
including failed things.
I'd be +1 once regression issue is resolved. Great works.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@knusbaum @srdo @harshach @HeartSaVioR @abellina I really would appreciate
it if you could take another look at this patch. I think everything is ready
to go except a final squash before merging it.
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
Not sure what has been happening with travis not being able to get to the
apache maven repo all the time, but my build in travis passed
https://travis-ci.org/revans2/incubator-storm/builds/157725399
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I could not reproduce the one failure and the rat failure is fixed by
STORM-2054 https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1648
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
Looks like there were two failures in travis. One is a rat issue with
storm-submit-tools the other is an integration test that timed out. I'll try
to reproduce the issues and see if I can fix them.
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I recovered it and fixed some issues with integration tests/rat. I think
it should be good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@srdo Ya that is what I did. Thanks for the advice. Not sure what
happened somehow when I upmerged all but 2 of my commits disappeared.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user srdo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
Check the ref log, maybe you can recover https://git-scm.com/docs/git-reflog
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
Sorry, git just ate all of my more recent changes, and I have no idea what
happened. I'll try to see if I can recover them, but I might have to start
over...
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I just pushed in a much of new fixes and addressed all of the outstanding
review comments. I think it is good to go. Please take another look/test it
and let me know.
I have run tests with
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@HeartSaVioR I figured out what happened to make the supervisor crash. In
the transition from RUNNING to KILL to speed things up slot starts localizing
resources for the new assignment. In the tran
Github user d2r commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I was able to review most of the code. I skimmed the tests and didn't see
anything strange.
@revans2 knows that I will not be able to log on again for awhile. I want
to leave a note for other
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@HeartSaVioR Yes it looks like I need to think through recovery and any
races with the AsyncLocalizer a bit more. I'll try to reproduce your error.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I found another issue:
When I rebalance 3 workers into 1 worker, all workers are killed first
(expected) and AsyncLocalizer clear out topology codes since all workers are
killed.
But Su
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
With my patch (symlink issue and NPE issue) I can see workers launched and
killed by Supervisor V2. (remote)
Tested:
- kill worker process with -9
- rebalance with different worke
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
Found other issue:
Constructor of BasicContainer (in fact constructor of Container) throws FNF
when topology dist files are deleted. So even though Slot is creating with
recover mode, Superv
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I merged this in my local, and do some tests, and see:
1. integration test fails from my dev. machine
- I'm using OSX 10.11, Java 1.8.0_66
- I got wrong IP address from integr
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I think I have addressed most of the issues so far. I have been running
some manual tests and have run a cluster with run as user and cgroup
enforcement enabled. I plan on doing some more tests, bu
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@HeartSaVioR take your time. I want to be sure that I have plenty of
eyeballs looking at this. We are doing this mostly because we started to run
into a lot of race conditions in the supervisor. W
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
I'm still reviewing this. Nice work to refactor to introduce greater
readability. Will leave comment here once I'm done with first pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@abellina I addressed all of your comments. I also have manually run all
of the unit tests and they are passing for me, despite the travis issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1642
@d2r @abellina @harshach @knusbaum
I believe that I am done and that the code is ready to merge. I have
addressed all of the review comments to date. I have finished with updating
the uni
39 matches
Mail list logo
