On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hey Akila,
>
> Will verify with Sajith about IaaSProviderTestCase.
>
>
Sorry guys, it was a mistake and not meant as a "failed" test case. Thanks
for fixing it! :)
Btw, found that the new test case added IaasProviderAttributeTest nee
Github user Thanu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45575891
--- Diff:
products/stratos/modules/distribution/src/main/conf/drools/mincheck.drl ---
@@ -83,9 +81,8 @@ dialect "mvel"
0,
Github user swgkg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45575684
--- Diff:
products/stratos/modules/distribution/src/main/conf/drools/mincheck.drl ---
@@ -83,9 +81,8 @@ dialect "mvel"
0,
Github user swgkg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45575676
--- Diff:
components/org.apache.stratos.cloud.controller/src/main/java/org/apache/stratos/cloud/controller/statistics/publisher/DASMemberStatusPublisher.java
---
Github user lahirus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45574763
--- Diff:
components/org.apache.stratos.common/src/main/java/org/apache/stratos/common/statistics/publisher/ThriftStatisticsPublisher.java
---
@@ -61,54 +57
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15021564#comment-15021564
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STRATOS-1629:
-
GitHub user Thanu opened a pull reque
GitHub user Thanu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493
Fixing multiple publisher objects created for DAS events and refactoring
cep and das thrift statistics publishers.
This p/r includes changes for fixing multiple publisher objects created for
DAS eve
Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran created STRATOS-1629:
--
Summary: DAS publishers created each time when an event is
published from stratos to DAS.
Key: STRATOS-1629
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
Thanks very much for your thoughts.
I will do the needful.
Thanks,
Raj.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> +1 to remove the validation check in all other test cases except the
> specific test case which tested that particular artifacts, if it has
> con
Hi Sajith,
PCA executes life cycle state events at the startup and it also wait until
member initiatlized event to start its process. Therefore I do not think we
can apply patches to PCA and restart.
Can you please explain the patching process you are proposing?
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6
Hi Imesh,
It is bf4335b1ef60b4ea596ee3b14960deac5a8e55fe. I have mentioned it in the
JIRA, STRATOS-1625.
Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> Great work Raj!! Can you please share the commit revision?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Isuru Haththot
Great work Raj!! Can you please share the commit revision?
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
> Good work Raj!
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
> wrote:
>
>> This is fixed and available in 4.1.x branch. Relevant JIRA is
>> STRATOS-1625.
>>
Hi Raj,
If it failed at the first place, then there might be some issue as this
test used to work first time as i can remember..:)
Thanks,
Reka
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hey Akila,
>
> Will verify with Sajith about IaaSProviderTestCase.
>
> Luckily, GroupTe
Hi Raj,
+1 to remove the validation check in all other test cases except the
specific test case which tested that particular artifacts, if it has
considerable performance issue.
Every test cases were implemented in an isolated manner. We didn't maintain
any order earlier in order to introduce par
Hey Akila,
Will verify with Sajith about IaaSProviderTestCase.
Luckily, GroupTerminationBehaviorTestCase is failing at the first time :).
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 214.032 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in TestSuite
testTerminationBehavior(org.apache.stratos.integration
Hi Raj,
IaaSProviderTestCase has been added 2 days ago. I'm not sure why it was
marked as disabled. Perhaps the test case was not complete? Better check
that before enabling.
Also GroupTerminationBehaviorTestCase and
PartitionOneAfterAnotherClusterTestCase
started failing intermittently. So don't
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, 周华康 <459673...@qq.com> wrote:
> Hi,all,
> I want to join you to develop the Apache Stratos.
> Some simple self introduction:
> I have some experience on Software development,and now as a
> postgraduate from China,my major is Cloud Computer
>
>
Thanks Akila. I have tested IaaSProviderTestCase and it passed, so I
enabled and pushed the changes to 4.1.x. I will check why
GroupTerminationBehaviorTestCase & PartitionOneAfterAnotherClusterTestCase
are failing.
Thanks,
Raj.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera
wrote:
> Hi
[Adding Hank]
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
> Hi Hank,
>
> Welcome to the Apache Stratos community!
>
> You are very welcome to contribute to Apache Stratos. The latest released
> version is 4.1.4, and you can refer the wiki [1] as a starting point. You
> can either t
Hi Pranavan,
It's nice to hear from you! Yes I went through the attached documents,
please find few comments below:
- Documentation has only around 3 pages of content, might be better to
explain this in detail
- The bench mark test has been run for around 20 min and it has only
done o
Hi Raj,
These test cases were excluded because they were failing due to bugs
(either in test case or Stratos components) and we didn't have enough time
to fix those. I think we created JIRAs to track these and fix in a later
release.
Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
21 matches
Mail list logo
