Re: Why some test cases are excluded from integration tests?

2015-11-22 Thread Sajith Kariyawasam
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Hey Akila, > > Will verify with Sajith about IaaSProviderTestCase. > > Sorry guys, it was a mistake and not meant as a "failed" test case. Thanks for fixing it! :) Btw, found that the new test case added IaasProviderAttributeTest nee

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Fixing multiple publisher objects created fo...

2015-11-22 Thread Thanu
Github user Thanu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45575891 --- Diff: products/stratos/modules/distribution/src/main/conf/drools/mincheck.drl --- @@ -83,9 +81,8 @@ dialect "mvel" 0,

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Fixing multiple publisher objects created fo...

2015-11-22 Thread swgkg
Github user swgkg commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45575684 --- Diff: products/stratos/modules/distribution/src/main/conf/drools/mincheck.drl --- @@ -83,9 +81,8 @@ dialect "mvel" 0,

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Fixing multiple publisher objects created fo...

2015-11-22 Thread swgkg
Github user swgkg commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45575676 --- Diff: components/org.apache.stratos.cloud.controller/src/main/java/org/apache/stratos/cloud/controller/statistics/publisher/DASMemberStatusPublisher.java ---

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Fixing multiple publisher objects created fo...

2015-11-22 Thread lahirus
Github user lahirus commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493#discussion_r45574763 --- Diff: components/org.apache.stratos.common/src/main/java/org/apache/stratos/common/statistics/publisher/ThriftStatisticsPublisher.java --- @@ -61,54 +57

[jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1629) DAS publishers created each time when an event is published from stratos to DAS.

2015-11-22 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15021564#comment-15021564 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on STRATOS-1629: - GitHub user Thanu opened a pull reque

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Fixing multiple publisher objects created fo...

2015-11-22 Thread Thanu
GitHub user Thanu opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/493 Fixing multiple publisher objects created for DAS events and refactoring cep and das thrift statistics publishers. This p/r includes changes for fixing multiple publisher objects created for DAS eve

[jira] [Created] (STRATOS-1629) DAS publishers created each time when an event is published from stratos to DAS.

2015-11-22 Thread Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran (JIRA)
Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran created STRATOS-1629: -- Summary: DAS publishers created each time when an event is published from stratos to DAS. Key: STRATOS-1629 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira

Re: One test scenario doesn't need to be tested in multiple test cases

2015-11-22 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Thanks very much for your thoughts. I will do the needful. Thanks, Raj. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu wrote: > Hi Raj, > > +1 to remove the validation check in all other test cases except the > specific test case which tested that particular artifacts, if it has > con

Re: [Discuss] Suggesting a patching model for PCA

2015-11-22 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi Sajith, PCA executes life cycle state events at the startup and it also wait until member initiatlized event to start its process. Therefore I do not think we can apply patches to PCA and restart. Can you please explain the patching process you are proposing? Thanks On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6

Re: Initialized or Suspended state members are not tracked by stratos on restart

2015-11-22 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hi Imesh, It is bf4335b1ef60b4ea596ee3b14960deac5a8e55fe. I have mentioned it in the JIRA, STRATOS-1625. Thanks. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Great work Raj!! Can you please share the commit revision? > > Thanks > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Isuru Haththot

Re: Initialized or Suspended state members are not tracked by stratos on restart

2015-11-22 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Great work Raj!! Can you please share the commit revision? Thanks On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > Good work Raj! > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam > wrote: > >> This is fixed and available in 4.1.x branch. Relevant JIRA is >> STRATOS-1625. >>

Re: Why some test cases are excluded from integration tests?

2015-11-22 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Hi Raj, If it failed at the first place, then there might be some issue as this test used to work first time as i can remember..:) Thanks, Reka On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Hey Akila, > > Will verify with Sajith about IaaSProviderTestCase. > > Luckily, GroupTe

Re: One test scenario doesn't need to be tested in multiple test cases

2015-11-22 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Hi Raj, +1 to remove the validation check in all other test cases except the specific test case which tested that particular artifacts, if it has considerable performance issue. Every test cases were implemented in an isolated manner. We didn't maintain any order earlier in order to introduce par

Re: Why some test cases are excluded from integration tests?

2015-11-22 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hey Akila, Will verify with Sajith about IaaSProviderTestCase. Luckily, GroupTerminationBehaviorTestCase is failing at the first time :). Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 214.032 sec <<< FAILURE! - in TestSuite testTerminationBehavior(org.apache.stratos.integration

Re: Why some test cases are excluded from integration tests?

2015-11-22 Thread Akila Ravihansa Perera
Hi Raj, IaaSProviderTestCase has been added 2 days ago. I'm not sure why it was marked as disabled. Perhaps the test case was not complete? Better check that before enabling. Also GroupTerminationBehaviorTestCase and PartitionOneAfterAnotherClusterTestCase started failing intermittently. So don't

Re: I want to join you to develop the Apache Stratos,to make it better,but still need some help from you all in this community

2015-11-22 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, 周华康 <459673...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi,all, > I want to join you to develop the Apache Stratos. > Some simple self introduction: > I have some experience on Software development,and now as a > postgraduate from China,my major is Cloud Computer > >

Re: Why some test cases are excluded from integration tests?

2015-11-22 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Thanks Akila. I have tested IaaSProviderTestCase and it passed, so I enabled and pushed the changes to 4.1.x. I will check why GroupTerminationBehaviorTestCase & PartitionOneAfterAnotherClusterTestCase are failing. Thanks, Raj. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera wrote: > Hi

Re: I want to join you to develop the Apache Stratos,to make it better,but still need some help from you all in this community

2015-11-22 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
[Adding Hank] On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > Hi Hank, > > Welcome to the Apache Stratos community! > > You are very welcome to contribute to Apache Stratos. The latest released > version is 4.1.4, and you can refer the wiki [1] as a starting point. You > can either t

Re: [GSoC - 2015] [Project Deliverables]

2015-11-22 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi Pranavan, It's nice to hear from you! Yes I went through the attached documents, please find few comments below: - Documentation has only around 3 pages of content, might be better to explain this in detail - The bench mark test has been run for around 20 min and it has only done o

Re: Why some test cases are excluded from integration tests?

2015-11-22 Thread Akila Ravihansa Perera
Hi Raj, These test cases were excluded because they were failing due to bugs (either in test case or Stratos components) and we didn't have enough time to fix those. I think we created JIRAs to track these and fix in a later release. Thanks. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam