Re: DISCUSS: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity)

2015-08-04 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
ved with the current capability of stratos. Will get others input as well on this. Thanks, Reka > > > Thanks > > > > Martin > > > > *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 10:09 PM > *To:* dev > *Subject:* Re:

RE: DISCUSS: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity)

2015-07-30 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity) Hi Martin, I will provide some details according to what i have understood. Please correct me, if I'm wrong. A group can consist of different kind of VMs which we called as cartridges in stratos. In that case, co-located affinity c

Re: DISCUSS: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity)

2015-07-29 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Hi Martin, I will provide some details according to what i have understood. Please correct me, if I'm wrong. A group can consist of different kind of VMs which we called as cartridges in stratos. In that case, co-located affinity can be provided to VMs which are part of same group by providing a

DISCUSS: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity)

2015-07-29 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
Hi, As part of our original grouping design we proposed a feature to either co-locate or not co-locate individual VMs. Quoting from the original grouping specification: Quote begin: Co-Location VMs within a group will be spun up based on the model of subscriptions, deployment policies and part