ved with the current capability of
stratos. Will get others input as well on this.
Thanks,
Reka
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 10:09 PM
> *To:* dev
> *Subject:* Re:
: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity)
Hi Martin,
I will provide some details according to what i have understood. Please correct
me, if I'm wrong.
A group can consist of different kind of VMs which we called as cartridges in
stratos. In that case, co-located affinity c
Hi Martin,
I will provide some details according to what i have understood. Please
correct me, if I'm wrong.
A group can consist of different kind of VMs which we called as cartridges
in stratos. In that case, co-located affinity can be provided to VMs which
are part of same group by providing a
Hi,
As part of our original grouping design we proposed a feature to either
co-locate or not co-locate individual VMs.
Quoting from the original grouping specification:
Quote begin:
Co-Location
VMs within a group will be spun up based on the model of subscriptions,
deployment policies and part
