+1
We already do the code reviews and PRs almost entirely on Github and probably
some of us use the sync'd Github repo for our upstream remote and not Apache so
this will cut out some fat.
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:35 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Ate Douma wrote
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2017-07-05 22:16, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>
>>> Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
>>> Hmm, just ch
I acknowledged on the IPMC thread that this was not a formal group decision. I
just opened a new thread on private@ to continue this discussion.
Steve
On July 5, 2017 at 2:45:45 PM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu) wrote:
On 2017-07-05 20:42, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> Steve's working on the resolution
On 2017-07-05 22:16, Suneel Marthi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single thread
voting
on that move
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
>> Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
>>
>
> Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single thread
> voting
> on that move, again without *any* context.
On 2017-07-05 20:42, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Steve's working on the resolution proposal and will be sending it out today.
Right.
While I'm +1 on that proposal, and also on the argument Steve gave on the
question from John Ament about the 'selection' of the proposed PMC members,
neither of these h
On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single thread voting
on that move, again without *any* context.
If anything, it greatly simplifies committer workflow as Steve'
Steve's working on the resolution proposal and will be sending it out today.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2017-06-24 19:29, sblackmon wrote:
>
>> The voting period has elapsed and the vote is now closed.
>>
>
> Who is going to draft up a resolution proposal?
> Next board
Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
If anything, it greatly simplifies committer workflow as Steve's mentioned
before.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2017-07-05 19:22, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
>> This is a vote to move all streams repos to G
On 2017-06-24 19:29, sblackmon wrote:
The voting period has elapsed and the vote is now closed.
Who is going to draft up a resolution proposal?
Next board meeting 19 July, and before that the IPMC needs
to vote and accept the grauduation proposal for the board.
So if the hope is to graduate AS
On 2017-07-05 19:22, Suneel Marthi wrote:
This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the other
projects have started to move their repos to gitbox.
This was discussed before, and while I probably will be +1,
I'm still clueless what gitbox provides, allows, enabled and what
rest
+1 binding.
This will simplify the committer workflow significantly.
On July 5, 2017 at 12:22:15 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org) wrote:
This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the other
projects have started to move their repos to gitbox.
Here's my +1 binding.
This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the other
projects have started to move their repos to gitbox.
Here's my +1 binding.
This vote will close in 72 hrs.
13 matches
Mail list logo
