svn commit: r373090 - /struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/remoting/XhtmlHelper.java

Author: craigmcc Date: Fri Jan 27 22:28:45 2006 New Revision: 373090 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=373090&view=rev Log: When utilized by a component inside a tool at design time, it is likely that the initialization normally performed on the first request to our phase listener will not ha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38374] - Validation always skipped with Globals.CANCEL_KEY

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38374] - Automatic Validation always bypassed with CANCEL_PROPERTY

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38374] - Automatic Validation always bypassed with CANCEL_PROPERTY

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r373053 - /struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/remoting/impl/MethodBindingProcessor.java

Author: craigmcc Date: Fri Jan 27 16:53:46 2006 New Revision: 373053 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=373053&view=rev Log: Correctly set the logging level of a debugging message. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/remoting/impl/MethodBindingProcessor.ja

svn commit: r373031 - /struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/remoting/XhtmlHelper.java

Author: craigmcc Date: Fri Jan 27 15:35:14 2006 New Revision: 373031 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=373031&view=rev Log: Promote the mapResourceId() method from protected to public scope, since it is generally useful. No functional change -- the big diff is because the method was moved in

Re: svn commit: r372715 - /struts/shale/trunk/build/test-framework/project.xml

On 1/27/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wendy, > > With m2 wouldn't you just give this a scope of test? It's a matter of viewpoint ... when you are compiling the test framework itself, these things are compile time dependencies :-). Sean Craig

Re: svn commit: r372715 - /struts/shale/trunk/build/test-framework/project.xml

Wendy, With m2 wouldn't you just give this a scope of test? Sean On 1/26/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/26/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can see why these two have to be declared, since the Shale code directly > > depends on them. But HtmlUnit itself

Help adding Struts to AJAX impl

Hello fellow developers, I am new to your list. I have enjoyed using Struts for about 3 years now. I have searched the dev archive concerning my current task and I am not sure how to word my query. I am coming up with a lot of results labeled as a commit to your code base. I have an AJAX implemen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38294] - FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() & only one renderkit instance

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: display tag link busted

Fixed in SVN. Site not updated, though. -- Martin Cooper On 1/27/06, David Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On this page: > > http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/preface.html#resources > > The display tag link is this: > > http://http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/ > > > -Dave >

svn commit: r372918 - /struts/action/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/preface.xml

Author: martinc Date: Fri Jan 27 09:15:29 2006 New Revision: 372918 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372918&view=rev Log: Fix broken link to the display taglib. Modified: struts/action/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/preface.xml Modified: struts/action/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/preface.xml URL: htt

Re: bug in html-el

On 1/27/06, Nicolas De Loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I must be mis-understaning something somewhere - this looks like your > >using this to cache on the server side only - including the above in > >your page - rather than on the browser side? > > > >Niall > > > > > I include a cache-control

Re: display tag link busted

On 1/27/06, David Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On this page: > http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/preface.html#resources > The display tag link is this: > http://http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/ I added this to Bug 38349: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38349] - [site] Broken Links

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35703] - [tiles] TilesUtilImpl doInclude() should call TilesRequestProcessor doInclude()... but it doesn't

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

display tag link busted

On this page: http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/preface.html#resources The display tag link is this: http://http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/ -Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

Re: bug in html-el

I must be mis-understaning something somewhere - this looks like your using this to cache on the server side only - including the above in your page - rather than on the browser side? Niall I include a cache-control HTTP header so that the browser can cache the file. Having static javascri

Re: bug in html-el

On 1/27/06, Nicolas De Loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Can I ask why you want this? You may be interested in a recent changeI made > >to Commons Validator - it now creates a copy of all the staticscripts in one > >file and also a "compressed" version of the same.Should be available when >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38421] - Symbol attributes only work as all lower-case

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38421 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-27 17:42 --- The symbols were not treating case insensitivity in a consistent way. Fix is in the 20060127 nightly builds. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38420] - Clay cuts off first character of files

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-27 17:39 --- The html parser was truncating characters in a document ending in plain text. Fix for this is in *todays* nightly builds 20060127. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35703] - [tiles] TilesUtilImpl doInclude() should call TilesRequestProcessor doInclude()... but it doesn't

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: bug in html-el

Can I ask why you want this? You may be interested in a recent changeI made to Commons Validator - it now creates a copy of all the staticscripts in one file and also a "compressed" version of the same.Should be available when Validator 1.2.1 is released. Can you explain me this new func

Re: bug in html-el

On 1/27/06, Nicolas De Loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't read my logs well ! EL and Non EL have same behaviour... OK good, thats what I expected after looking at the code. > I'd like Validator to generate the Static Javascript, without the >

Re: bug in html-el

Sorry, I didn't read my logs well ! EL and Non EL have same behaviour... I'd like Validator to generate the Static Javascript, without the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38422] New: - avascriptValidatorTag may not search for Form is formname is null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38421] New: - Symbol attributes only work as all lower-case

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38420] New: - Clay cuts off first character of files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: bug in html-el

On 1/27/06, Nicolas De Loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm using to build the static javascript validation : > > <%@ page contentType="text/javascript" session="false" %> > <% response.setHeader("Cache-Control","post-check=900,pre-check=3600"); %> > <%@ taglib prefix="html" uri="http://struts.

Re: Validation Security Hole?

On 1/27/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall, > > Okay. I understand now I now prefer throwing an exception because it > stops a corner case which > I haven't mentioned yet. I was going to ask if we should also remove the > CANCEL_KEY from the > request attribute if cancelling

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21282] - [validator] numeric validations should use locales

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

bug in html-el

I'm using to build the static javascript validation : <%@ page contentType="text/javascript" session="false" %> <% response.setHeader("Cache-Control","post-check=900,pre-check=3600"); %> <%@ taglib prefix="html" uri="http://struts.apache.org/tags-html"; %> If I use tags-html-el, The tag perf

Re: Validation Security Hole?

Niall, Okay. I understand now I now prefer throwing an exception because it stops a corner case which I haven't mentioned yet. I was going to ask if we should also remove the CANCEL_KEY from the request attribute if cancelling is disabled, but the Exception won't even let it pass. So I gue

Re: Validation Security Hole?

On 1/27/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I very much dislike changing the default behavior within a minor release > >> or a milestone. But, > if we can restrain the changes to the configuration, I suppose we could live > with it. > > Ted, perhaps you need to think about this more

Re: Validation Security Hole?

>> I very much dislike changing the default behavior within a minor release or >> a milestone. But, if we can restrain the changes to the configuration, I suppose we could live with it. Ted, perhaps you need to think about this more :) Unless there are plans to come up with a different solutio

Re: Validation Security Hole?

On 1/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the patch, can shorten the property name to "Cancellable", with two > l's (like NetBeans). +1 and rather than "get" would be better as "is" - i.e. "isCancellable()" Niall

Re: Validation Security Hole?

On 1/26/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In case this was missed on the dev boards, I did put out a proposed solution > before today's new > discussion came up: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38374 > > It's for Struts 1.2.x. Is there a different approach that w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35703] - [tiles] TilesUtilImpl doInclude() should call TilesRequestProcessor doInclude()... but it doesn't

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Can a FormBeanConfig know it's ModuleConfig ?

Hello, I'm trying to setup a Spring - actionform integration, the same way DelegatingRequesprocessor can integration Spring with actions. I'm using a special FormBeanConfig that applies IoC after form-bean creation. It requires the current ModuleConfig . Is there a way to get it from a Form