svn commit: r386550 - /struts/shale/trunk/mailreader/build.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Thu Mar 16 21:57:13 2006 New Revision: 386550 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386550&view=rev Log: Exclude remoting, tiger, designtime, tiles, cargo and creator2 jars from WEB-INF/lib. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/mailreader/build.xml Modified: struts/shale/trunk

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21679] - Map-backed ActionForms - multiple select - object value conversion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r386541 - in /struts/shale/trunk: build.properties.sample build.xml use-cases/build.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Thu Mar 16 21:04:14 2006 New Revision: 386541 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386541&view=rev Log: Added Cargo integration to the Use Cases example. To use Cargo to run the integration tests, you will need to: * execute 'ant download-dependencies' to retrieve the Cargo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Shale 1.0.1 release plan

>From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 3/16/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: > > > > Just an update... the integration testing looks good, and I'll work on > > the release notes more tonight. Gary, do you have anything left to > > add? > > > > Another issue just came up on user@: The mai

svn commit: r386527 - /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/java/org/apache/shale/usecases/rolodex/WebPagerRenderer.java

Author: gvanmatre Date: Thu Mar 16 20:21:56 2006 New Revision: 386527 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386527&view=rev Log: Changed the BigDecimal to use a double constructor for java 1.4 compliance. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/java/org/apache/shale/usecases/rolodex/WebP

svn commit: r386523 - /struts/shale/trunk/docs/release-notes-1.0.1.html

Author: gvanmatre Date: Thu Mar 16 20:10:23 2006 New Revision: 386523 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386523&view=rev Log: Added missing enhancement Modified: struts/shale/trunk/docs/release-notes-1.0.1.html Modified: struts/shale/trunk/docs/release-notes-1.0.1.html URL: http://svn.a

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

Excellent, thanks for giving it a spin Frank. Niall - Original Message - From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 12:00 AM > I have the next version of a production app in QA right now under 1.2.9 > (since this Monday). Not a full production load of

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

Thanks all for your input. Michael, you're right: 1.3 is not that big of a leap compared to a 2.0. Therefore, upgrading to 1.3 should be pretty trivial. Niall, we need to find a company to support Struts development =o) Paul __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

On 3/16/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is this the end of line for the 1.2 branch? One thing > that I admire the Spring Framework team for is their desire > and willingness to backport *minor* enhancements from the > upcoming 2.0 release into the 1.2 branch. Because I find > thei

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

If you search the archives, you can find quite a few interesting comments about the 1.2 branch and its future. Here's just one thread: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.devel/25785/match=1+2+branch+dead (first one that came up from my search, just happened to be mine :) ) The

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

On 3/17/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is this the end of line for the 1.2 branch? One thing > that I admire the Spring Framework team for is their desire > and willingness to backport *minor* enhancements from the > upcoming 2.0 release into the 1.2 branch. Because I find > thei

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

Err: One thing which I found inspiring in Ted's emails (see the user list) is the willingness to evolve without being a revolutionary. --- Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is this the end of line for the 1.2 branch? One thing > that I admire the Spring Framework team for is their des

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

So is this the end of line for the 1.2 branch? One thing that I admire the Spring Framework team for is their desire and willingness to backport *minor* enhancements from the upcoming 2.0 release into the 1.2 branch. Because I find their level of support admirable, I wonder how many commiters here

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

I have the next version of a production app in QA right now under 1.2.9 (since this Monday). Not a full production load of course, but a number of people testing new app features. No problems reported. I'm not using any of the new features, heck, I can't even say I know all the changes at th

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

Yes, I have it in production. Niall - Original Message - From: "Paul Benedict" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 11:45 PM > Has anyone "ate our own dog food" by putting 1.2.9 in a > production system? I haven't; no time to try it yet; > so I am just wondering. -- Pau

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

Has anyone "ate our own dog food" by putting 1.2.9 in a production system? I haven't; no time to try it yet; so I am just wondering. -- Paul PS: Don't forget to add the cancel update notice in the release notes if it goes GA. PSS: Great work guys. I really enjoy working with you all too. ___

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

My vote is for "GA". Niall - Original Message - From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 11:10 PM > The Struts 1.2.9 test build has been available for a week now. Once you have > had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please resp

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

+1 for GA...good work! Don Niall Pemberton wrote: The Struts 1.2.9 test build has been available for a week now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote. --- Bas

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

On 3/16/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Struts 1.2.9 test build has been available for a week now. Once you have > had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond > to the following vote. > > -

[VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

The Struts 1.2.9 test build has been available for a week now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote. --- Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.9 build should be cl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Shale 1.0.1 release plan

>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Just an update... the integration testing looks good, and I'll work on > the release notes more tonight. Gary, do you have anything left to > add? > I was going to add the "description" node to the clay dtd as an enhancement. I forgot about this

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Shale 1.0.1 release plan

On 3/16/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just an update... the integration testing looks good, and I'll work on > the release notes more tonight. Gary, do you have anything left to > add? > > Another issue just came up on user@: The mailreader example has too > many jars in WEB-INF/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Shale 1.0.1 release plan

Just an update... the integration testing looks good, and I'll work on the release notes more tonight. Gary, do you have anything left to add? Another issue just came up on user@: The mailreader example has too many jars in WEB-INF/lib, including shale-tiger.jar which causes problems if you depl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39001] New: - Cannot load a validator resource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r386402 - /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/java/org/apache/shale/usecases/rolodex/WebPagerRenderer.java

Author: gvanmatre Date: Thu Mar 16 09:43:33 2006 New Revision: 386402 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386402&view=rev Log: Java 1.4 API compatibility fix. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/java/org/apache/shale/usecases/rolodex/WebPagerRenderer.java Modified: struts/shale/t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Add Struts to Apache Projects site

Ya, I was wondering the same. May be a good time to ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Funny, this page: http://projects.apache.org/languages.html ...doesn't mention C#/.Net -- sorry Ted ;) -- James Mitchell EdgeTech, Inc. http://edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 Skype: jmitchtx On Mar 16, 2006,

Re: Add Struts to Apache Projects site

Good stuff, do we need a separate doap per "product" or will one per project do? If its one per product them maybe we should name it doap-struts-action.rdf - then when Shale, Standalone Tiles etc are released we can have doap-struts-shale.rdf and doap-struts-tiles.rdf? Niall On 3/16/06, James Mit

Re: Add Struts to Apache Projects site

I remember seeing discussions about this on site-dev@, but I hadn't taken the time to lookuntil now. I've committed an initial stab at a doap file for Struts. Everyone feel free to update it as you see fit. I suppose once we publish this file, we should tell someone over on [EMAIL PRO

svn commit: r386311 - /struts/site/trunk/xdocs/doap_Struts.rdf

Author: jmitchell Date: Thu Mar 16 03:34:30 2006 New Revision: 386311 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386311&view=rev Log: Initial doap file. See http://projects.apache.org/doap.html for more details on why this is needed. Thanks Anto Paul for pushing this back in front of my attention.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36687] - Struts not populating form values when maxFileSize exceeded during file upload

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38986] - RequestProcessor does not need synchronization to get action from action map

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu