On 5/24/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the following code demo an hotswap design for file change monitoring.
the
> only limitation is that shall use getMap() first and once.
>
> map idMap = getMap(), and latter use idMap variable through an request
> thread. you can use weaked
>From: ÁÖ Ã÷ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello, every one. I'm an chinese, my english not good enough to express my
> concepts fluently. say sorry first.
>
No worries, but I'm not sure what my excuse for poor English is since it's the
only
language I know :--)
> I would like to start an new ide
On 5/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't had a chance to file a bug on this one yet, but I think
there's a problem in how the PerformForward command handles modules.
(I posted about it to the list but got no responses.)
Oh, I thought that message went with the issue you op
Hello, every one. I'm an chinese, my english not good enough to express my
concepts fluently. say sorry first.
I would like to start an new idea project in which jsf ,page flow and work
flow are integrated seamlessly . it will use pageflow(or dialog) as the
user form interfaces for every human
I'm going to take a moment to chime in here as I've been watching this
thread develop. I'm going to come out in the open and say I've never used
DWR or even looked at it's documentation. When I've used ajax
functionality in the past we've simply made the XmlHttpRequest hit an
action that in turn
> > but if you want to model best practices, then you
> have to ask "why
> > would you be intent on calling Actions"? I'm not
> trying to build
> > walls so that people can't just get-the-job-done,
> but I do know from
> > experience that people tend to overload Actions
> with too much
> > busines
On Wed, May 24, 2006 1:09 pm, Ian Roughley wrote:
>> I wonder about the response though... one thing I've found is that
>> people
>> for some reason, generally anyway, don't realize that they can use a JSP
>> to render an Ajax response. Maybe all the examples they see shows the
>> response being c
--
From Down & Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design * Development
~
web: www.fdar.com
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:617.821.5430
~
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 12:38 pm, Ian Roughley wrote:
> There is a point that I would like to re-iterate. The proposal is for 2
> separate approaches:
>
> #1 - Have struts2 actions accept JSON / XML content when being called
> from a URI and have JSON/XML responses. This is to allow struts2 to
> int
At 7:21 PM +0300 5/24/06, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
Frank you are absolutely correct about the description of how DWR
works today. What I have done is exactly what you are thinking of:
made DWR work through the normal WebWork chain. So, all incoming DWR
requests are done to a single entry point th
On Wed, May 24, 2006 12:09 pm, Joe Germuska wrote:
> At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>>On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
>> > Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused
>>> about why someone would want to "integrate" DWR with Struts?
There is a point that I would like to re-iterate. The proposal is for 2
separate approaches:
#1 - Have struts2 actions accept JSON / XML content when being called
from a URI and have JSON/XML responses. This is to allow struts2 to
interact with any ajax/XHR framework, and would involve new i
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 12:21 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> Frank you are absolutely correct about the description of how DWR
> works today. What I have done is exactly what you are thinking of:
> made DWR work through the normal WebWork chai
On 5/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
> > Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused
>> about why someone would want to "integrate" DWR with Struts?
On Wed, May 24, 2006 12:21 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> Frank you are absolutely correct about the description of how DWR
> works today. What I have done is exactly what you are thinking of:
> made DWR work through the normal WebWork chain. So, all incoming DWR
> requests are done to a single ent
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:22 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In my case I couldn't see a real benefit of having 2 different ways to
> "call" server-side functionality. For me it makes a lot of sense, that
> everything exposed by the server mus
Frank you are absolutely correct about the description of how DWR
works today. What I have done is exactly what you are thinking of:
made DWR work through the normal WebWork chain. So, all incoming DWR
requests are done to a single entry point that is than
initializing/making the request pass thro
At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused
about why someone would want to "integrate" DWR with Struts? I've
only used it a bit, but in each case, I didn't real
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:22 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In my case I couldn't see a real benefit of having 2 different ways to
> "call" server-side functionality. For me it makes a lot of sense, that
> everything exposed by the server must be an action. This allows me to
> re-use almost everythin
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
> At 10:46 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>>I haven't seen your work, so I can't talk intelligently about it... I
>>would agree though that if DWR is going to make HTTP calls to execute
>>Actions (a suggestion I might add that I made ab
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:10 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> Not sure how to read it, but call it request, or XMLHttpRequest it is
> still a request hiting your server. Probably on the comet-part things
> may be different, but that's completely another story.
I think this is worth going at a little m
In my case I couldn't see a real benefit of having 2 different ways to
"call" server-side functionality. For me it makes a lot of sense, that
everything exposed by the server must be an action. This allows me to
re-use almost everything and maybe later on to redesign my site by
mixing AJAX with no
At 10:46 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I haven't seen your work, so I can't talk intelligently about it... I
would agree though that if DWR is going to make HTTP calls to execute
Actions (a suggestion I might add that I made about two months ago to Joe
with regard to how to better in
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 10:32 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In the DWR-WW action invocation toy I have used when building
> InfoQ.com, the action invocation passes through exactly the same
> process as a normal request, so I have no concerns.
On Wed, May 24, 2006 10:32 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In the DWR-WW action invocation toy I have used when building
> InfoQ.com, the action invocation passes through exactly the same
> process as a normal request, so I have no concerns.
I haven't seen your work, so I can't talk intelligently a
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 9:46 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> I am somehow a little confused by some of the comments... pls see inlined
What, me confusing?!?!? NNNOOO...
;)
> On 5/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On
On Wed, May 24, 2006 9:46 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> I am somehow a little confused by some of the comments... pls see inlined
What, me confusing?!?!? NNNOOO...
;)
> On 5/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 23, 2006 2:57 pm, Ian Roughley wrote:
>> > Joe th
I am somehow a little confused by some of the comments... pls see inlined
On 5/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 2:57 pm, Ian Roughley wrote:
> Joe thought that a Struts2
> creator that read could read existing Struts2 configuration files, and
> expose a pa
Animesh,
I'm a little confused by your comments below. Currently the ajax
validation uses DWR and returns a value from the server-side java - take
a look at the DWRValidator class. Are you talking about direct
remoting, or the new comet functionality?
I think the first thing that needs to
--
From Down & Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design * Development
~
web: www.fdar.com
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:617.821.5430
~
--- Begin Message ---
Fr
At 9:48 PM -0700 5/23/06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Struts Action 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT has been deployed to Apache's Maven 2
snapshot repo,
and the distributions are available here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/struts-action/
For more information, please see the release plan:
Hi,
This is a backward compatibility reason, as nearly all the complex
stuff in Tiles :-).
The discussion should be in the old struts archives.
If you remove redundancies, you will break some backward
compatibilities, but you will certainly simplify Tiles.
Cedric
Wendy Smoak wrote:
32 matches
Mail list logo
