Please post this question to the Struts Users mailing list:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Antonio
2008/2/20, mule_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> This is the scenario using Struts 1.1:
>
> User Interface -> MyAction1 (input is Form1)-> MyAction 2 (input is Form2)
> ->User Interface
>
> MyAct
Before a GA release of 2.1 I'd ideally like to see dojo upgraded to the
latest, greatest stable version, because I can see this may cause some
headaches which would be best done at the start of the 2.1 GA releases as
opposed to half way through the 2.1 lifecycle. I'd also like to see a change
to a
Is this only a WebLogic issue (has anyone seen it in another container)?, if
so is it purely a WL 10 issue?, is the problem fixed in WL 10.1? If it's
only a WL issue I think that a temp patch is fine until BEA sort out
whatever is causing it to occur.
As a side note, rather than doing an isInfoEn
Personally I prefer using something like;
StrutsConstants.STRUTS_URL
I know it's not hip and funky, but it shows very clearly to anyone editing
the code where the constant is defined.
The Constant Interface Antipattern or static imports reduce the amount of
typing you have to do, but im
Yeah, the way Struts does versions kinda breaks this. You could see
very major changes between 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 because neither made GA.
Once a GA release has been made in a series, however, the normal rules
apply. It is beating a dead horse to say I never liked the Struts
versioning system, so mo
Here's the thing - I'm going to create the 2.1.1 test build on Sunday,
hopefully followed by test builds every couple weeks or so. Whatever
you can get into the code by those dates will be included in the
subsequent release. Honestly, I don't expect 2.1.1 to be GA, but am
aiming for a Beta vote.
This is the scenario using Struts 1.1:
User Interface -> MyAction1 (input is Form1)-> MyAction 2 (input is Form2)
->User Interface
MyAction1 and MyAction2 are Action classes.
MyAction1 and MyAction1 are configured in struts-config.xmxl.
MyAction1 takes Form1 as input.
MyAction2 takes For
The API has yet to be solidified and there are a few things that I'd
still like to discuss and possibly change in that regard. My main goal
is to ensure backwards compatibility in the convention plugin API.
My thinking is like this:
upgrading from [today's convention-plugin] to [final con
If convention-plugin is not bundled with the next release, people will stick
to the codebehind plugin. Last time I checked there was no smarturls for
2.1.x as well - so there is really not much choice.
(compiling from the sandbox is no option for most users)
You are probably correct. Howeve
Am Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2008 17:16:51 schrieb Brian Pontarelli:
> The API has yet to be solidified and there are a few things that I'd
> still like to discuss and possibly change in that regard. My main goal
> is to ensure backwards compatibility in the convention plugin API.
My thinking is like
+1!
Fabiano Franz
http://fabianofranz.com
http://literar.org
Piero Sartini-3 wrote:
>
> I think you should release the convention plugin at all costs - but this
> is
> just a vote from an user.
>
> piero
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-s2--Let%27s-ge
--- Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/20, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ...why *do* we have StrutsStatics as an interface implemented all over?
>
> IMHO all those "constants" should be scattered to all the needing
> classes, not centralized.
> In my past projects, I often
--- Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/20, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ...why *do* we have StrutsStatics as an interface implemented all over?
>
> IMHO all those "constants" should be scattered to all the needing
> classes, not centralized.
> In my past projects, I often
2008/2/20, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ...why *do* we have StrutsStatics as an interface implemented all over?
IMHO all those "constants" should be scattered to all the needing
classes, not centralized.
In my past projects, I often had this sort of "statics", but I always
found a way to put
It should be converted, if possible, to an abstract class. Interfaces are
for defining functionality. Furthermore, interfaces can only be public or
package-private. My advice comes from the guy who invented static imports,
but I can't reference to you what I read. Sorry!
Paul
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008
I hadn't even noticed that :)
musachy
On Feb 20, 2008 1:48 PM, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> implements vs imports vs static imports
>
> Probably just left over from the pre-j5 era.
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2008 1:42 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...why *do* we have Str
implements vs imports vs static imports
Probably just left over from the pre-j5 era.
On Feb 20, 2008 1:42 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...why *do* we have StrutsStatics as an interface implemented all over?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ---
On Feb 20, 2008 10:42 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...why *do* we have StrutsStatics as an interface implemented all over?
>
>
I don't know for sure, but that's pretty common practice before Java 5's
import static. It allowed any class that "implements the interface" to
access the
...why *do* we have StrutsStatics as an interface implemented all over?
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/2/20, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> The API has yet to be solidified...
About future and current development.
Releasing a distribution does not mean that it must be "complete": we will
vote its quality and, from your discussion, I presume that it will be
"alpha". But, at least,
Don, on the subject of XWork releases, I should have made this a
blocker, but this bug needs to be closed and I have a fix ready, just
don't have commit access. The patch is also in the bug if you want to
take care of it:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-599
-bp
Don Brown wrote:
Oh,
The API has yet to be solidified and there are a few things that I'd
still like to discuss and possibly change in that regard. My main goal
is to ensure backwards compatibility in the convention plugin API.
Furthermore, I think we should all start thinking about when the "true"
stable release
ok .Thank you
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=230134&messageID=309639#309639
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Please ask this question to the Struts Users mailing list:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
2008/2/20, Nidhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Please reply as soon as possible.
And... do not expect anyone answering your question fast. We are all
volunteers.
Antonio
Hi All,
Since struts1 has connection pooling mechanism using tag,what is
the procedure of connection pooling mechanism in struts2?
Can we do tht using tag?I have seen from some of
the search results for oracle db using
class:oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleConnectionCacheImpl. But I need
25 matches
Mail list logo
