Why not expand it out and allow users to specify a plugin processing
order?, that way any potential conflict of plugin handling method could
be resolved by specifying an order.
If we also introduced a dependency list in struts-plugin.xml the core
code could not only take a stab at the right or
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could 2.2 be a good time to finally include JSON and XML results?
>
this is good features,
how about JSON RPC and XMLRPC?
F
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>
> What configuration options?
>
Sorry, not @Action but @Result and location attribute, but I think I
understand now what it means ;-)
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> Yes, at least it's working! It was somehow hard to configure it. Why you
> choose to use not standard configuration options for @Action (they are not
> related to struts.xml action's config)?
>
What configuration options?
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Hi,
Yes, at least it's working! It was somehow hard to configure it. Why you
choose to use not standard configuration options for @Action (they are not
related to struts.xml action's config)?
Any why it's working with my project ;-)
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
No more excuses for you James, you have commit rights now ;)
musachy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:43 PM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> I just made a fix (patch) for the includeProperties feature of the JSON
> plugin would have committed it myself if it were part of the S2 codebase.
+1
I just made a fix (patch) for the includeProperties feature of the JSON
plugin would have committed it myself if it were part of the S2 codebase. I
personally thing we should bring this plugin into the main Struts 2 project.
James
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTEC
Could 2.2 be a good time to finally include JSON and XML results?
musachy
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Struts 2 desperately needs a public roadmap, IMO, so here's a quick
> strawman to get the discussion started:
>
> Struts 2.1
>
>* New plugins: REST,
I like Dusty's suggestion, or something like it:
musachy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not yet. Just thinking about how I'm going to pull it off.
>
> I'm using Guice for all the injection in JCatapult and we have this same
> situa
Not yet. Just thinking about how I'm going to pull it off.
I'm using Guice for all the injection in JCatapult and we have this same
situation in our Filter. There are a number of Workflow implementations
that need to be called in order such as: JPA (open-session-in-view),
static-resource, sec
Do you have an implementation of this already?
musachy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>> For those of you ignoring the spam on the Convention vote thread :). I
>> mentioned that the framework should support more than one
>>
Musachy Barroso wrote:
For those of you ignoring the spam on the Convention vote thread :). I
mentioned that the framework should support more than one
UnknownHandler, which would eventually make Convention and Codebehind
compatible, as well as other plugins in the future. The bad side
effect is
For those of you ignoring the spam on the Convention vote thread :). I
mentioned that the framework should support more than one
UnknownHandler, which would eventually make Convention and Codebehind
compatible, as well as other plugins in the future. The bad side
effect is that some configuration w
I will start a new thread to discuss this. (this vote is branching and
branching :) )
musachy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:59 AM, dusty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fair enough. OK, so Struts can loop through all UnknownHandlers it finds
> declared in various .xml files. Since there is no centra
Fair enough. OK, so Struts can loop through all UnknownHandlers it finds
declared in various .xml files. Since there is no central configuration
when working with plugins, how can sequence/prioritize how each set of rules
gets evaluated? Without something like a routes.rb, things can get
confus
> Don's point is a valid one, but I also hope that he agrees that its a good
> thing to somehow combine REST and Convention. I am not so sure that
> changing how Struts fundamentally works so that we can include more and
> competing plugins at runtime is a good thing. It is that type of confusion
Hi,
They are not on any repo, just on the trunk of their projects:
>
> http://svn.opensymphony.com/svn/xwork/trunk
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/struts2-convention-plugin
>
Thank you, I had in mean SVN repo ;-) I will try to use it in my projects.
Regards
--
Lukasz
h
They are not on any repo, just on the trunk of their projects:
http://svn.opensymphony.com/svn/xwork/trunk
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/struts2-convention-plugin
musachy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Lukasz Lenart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> The xbean class
Hi,
> The xbean classes are under: com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.finder
>
> and ASM 3.1 will be jar-jared into: org.objectweb.asm.xwork
>
> Convention in sandbox was updated to use the xbean classes.
>
Is it possible to checkout such version from repo?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.p
The xbean classes are under: com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.finder
and ASM 3.1 will be jar-jared into: org.objectweb.asm.xwork
Convention in sandbox was updated to use the xbean classes.
musachy
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maven-shade-plugin works
Yeah, as long as nothing breaks, feel free to up dependencies at will.
Don
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've rolled a patch and put it on
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2664, given the FM guys say it
> gave a 20x speedup in one sce
Guys,
I've rolled a patch and put it on
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2664, given the FM guys say
it gave a 20x speedup in one scenario I think it's probably worth
putting it in for the next release :).
Al.
-
T
David Blevins on 30/05/08 19:53, wrote:
Personally, I favor copying the code over and jarjar'ing the asm
dependency.
Two quick questions:
"jarjar'ing" the dependency? What does that mean? I hope I'm not the
only one who isn't hip to the lingo! I guess if I knew the context
better I could wor
23 matches
Mail list logo
