Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality

2009-01-09 Thread matt.payne
+1 here Musachy Barroso wrote: > > The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [http://people.apache.o

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-23 Thread matt.payne
Never mind sorry. I see xwork 2.1.2 is in released form. I had to change our pom from point at the snapshot. Matt matt.payne wrote: > > This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. > > on line 99 of struts-default.xml > com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-23 Thread matt.payne
This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. on line 99 of struts-default.xml com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager This class does not exist in xwork (maven). Please introduce a new xwork jar before releasing this change to struts. Anyway this can be fixed soon? Matthew Payne

Struts 2.1.2(an previous releases) vs 2.1.3 in regards to actionMessages in a sitemesh decorator

2008-09-07 Thread matt.payne
There seem to be some type of regression that has happen with regards to actionMessage/actionErrors. In the current build snapshots of 2.1.3 actionErrors/message are no longer exposed my to the sitemesh decorator(I am using freemarker result types/decorators). However that are still available to

Re: [VOTE] Bring Convention plugin into trunk and deprecate Zero Config

2008-09-02 Thread matt.payne
+1 Convention plugin looks like a solution that works for me, while the others only dabble with my interest. Matt Musachy Barroso wrote: > > With the addition of @IntereceptorRefs to the Convention plugin, it is > now possible to do most of the action mapping using annotations. Also > having 2

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread matt.payne
Disregard that post. Sorry. Matt matt.payne wrote: > > My build is getting xwork 2.0.4. > > This should pull xwork 2.1.x right? > > > -->2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > com/opensymphony/xwork2

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread matt.payne
My build is getting xwork 2.0.4. This should pull xwork 2.1.x right? -->2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto ry at org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ActionContextCleanUp.(ActionCon textClean

Struts2 Needs a new aliasInteceptor(thoughts?)

2008-04-16 Thread matt.payne
I have posted my thoughts about it http://blog.sutternow.com/2008/04/16/struts2-needs-a-new-aliasinterceptor here . http://blog.sutternow.com/2008/04/16/struts2-needs-a-new-aliasinterceptor I will paste them below as well. The original aliasInteceptor works fine for gluing together actions w

Re: Scope Plugin

2008-04-07 Thread matt.payne
Agreed on excellent value. It is a tremendous help for wizard type actions. Is it mature enough though? I don't think scope interceptor looks at annotations in a super class. I tried to consolidate similar functionality into a super class. After I was finished the annotations in the super cla

Re: 2.1 build

2008-04-04 Thread matt.payne
probably worth it. Otherwise people should org.apache.struts struts2-core . freemarker

Re: [s2] Let's get out Struts 2.1.1

2008-02-23 Thread matt.payne
Adam Peller wrote: > > > Dojo 1.0 is all about performance and stability, and the follow-on Dojo > 1.x releases continue in that direction with no radical changes to the > core or Dijit architecture. Dojo base is now very tiny (<25K, on par with > other toolkits) and the performance of the ne

Re: [s2] Let's get out Struts 2.1.1

2008-02-23 Thread matt.payne
I'm glad I am not the only what thinking this. I think dojo should be thrown out completely. Its a ridiculous that my normal 30KB web page request jumps to 500KB+ request as soon as I use the shead - ajax tag. I find jquery much smaller and easier to work with. Matt Musachy Barroso wrote: >

Re: http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-15 Thread matt.payne
Not to forget. The dtd file located here --> http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd Still needs to be updated to include default-class-ref Can someone update the site? Matt matt.payne wrote: > > I created the Jira issue for xwork. > > http://jira.opensymphony.co

Re: http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-15 Thread matt.payne
I created the Jira issue for xwork. http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-603 Ted Husted wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2008 10:34 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No not backwards at all. It is exactly how inheritance works. A child >> is >> free to overri

Re: http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-13 Thread matt.payne
Sorry about my last message. I wasn't sure if your response was directed to Chris or myself. newton.dave wrote: > > --- "matt.payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Chris Pratt wrote: >> > On Jan 10, 2008 1:15 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-13 Thread matt.payne
s-ref" couldn't be overriden by the children. Matthew Payne newton.dave wrote: > > --- "matt.payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Chris Pratt wrote: >> > On Jan 10, 2008 1:15 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It would b

Re: http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-10 Thread matt.payne
Chris Pratt wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008 1:15 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It would be a ton more useful if it could provide the default class for >> actions defined in a abstract parent package, where the implementation >> class >> fo

Re: http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-10 Thread matt.payne
> it saves some typing on larger projects. > (*Chris*) > > On Jan 10, 2008 12:08 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Never mind the "default-class-ref" is completely useless if there is not >> a >> way to indicate that

Re: http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-10 Thread matt.payne
Never mind the "default-class-ref" is completely useless if there is not a way to indicate that the actions should be constructed with this class substituted. With this setup. edit.vm edit.vm

http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.0.dtd needs to be updated

2008-01-10 Thread matt.payne
I believe struts 2.0.9 and up allow use of the tag "default-class-ref". However the dtd reference online is old and still is missing this tag. I'd like to take advantage of this tag using configuration inheritance to create abstract crud templates for crud actions.