Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

2005-12-21 Thread Joe Germuska
At 12:10 PM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote: The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention where the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in the package name. As for there being "one true Struts 2.0", I believe that idea has gone by the wayside. It might be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

2005-12-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/21/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 11:36 AM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote: > >As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of > >confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story > >that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two s

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

2005-12-21 Thread Don Brown
The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention where the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in the package name. As for there being "one true Struts 2.0", I believe that idea has gone by the wayside. It might be possible someday to merge Shale and Action, b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

2005-12-21 Thread Joe Germuska
At 11:36 AM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote: As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal frameworks - Action and Shale. To avoid fur

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

2005-12-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/21/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of > confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that I > think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal > frameworks - Action and Shale. T

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

2005-12-21 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I for one think this makes a tremendous amount of sense. However, does the word "proposal" still possibly represent some confusion? Is Shale still being billed as a "proposed Struts 2.0"? If it is, then calling Ti a proposal as well makes sense, but then there is still some confusion about Shale

[PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

2005-12-21 Thread Don Brown
As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal frameworks - Action and Shale. To avoid further confusion, I propose we rename Struts Ti