As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of
confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that I
think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal
frameworks - Action and Shale. To avoid further confusion, I propose we
rename Struts
I for one think this makes a tremendous amount of sense.
However, does the word proposal still possibly represent some confusion?
Is Shale still being billed as a proposed Struts 2.0? If it is, then
calling Ti a proposal as well makes sense, but then there is still some
confusion about Shale's
At 11:36 AM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote:
As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of
confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story
that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but
equal frameworks - Action and Shale. To avoid
The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention where
the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in the package
name. As for there being one true Struts 2.0, I believe that idea has
gone by the wayside. It might be possible someday to merge Shale and
Action,
On 12/21/05, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:36 AM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote:
As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of
confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story
that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate
At 12:10 PM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote:
The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention
where the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in
the package name. As for there being one true Struts 2.0, I
believe that idea has gone by the wayside. It might be
