Is there a XWork User or Dev mailing list? I have only found
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James Mitchell
On Mar 30, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 3/30/06, Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don,
I was refering to phase I really, whether the starting point is
Webwork or Webwork + XWork.
James,
for xwork the same lists as for webwork are used...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hth,
Rainer
Is there a XWork User or Dev mailing list? I have only found
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James Mitchell
On Mar 30, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 3/30/06, Gabe [EMAIL
I sort of suspected that that was the case.
For me, I don't use forums (it's a pull vs push thing) and strangely,
the ww traffic doesn't seem to be coming to our dev list anymore (at
least I thought it used to). Something must have happened when I
wasn't looking.
--
James Mitchell
This may be a dumb suggestion but why not implement a lightweight action
class that's in StrutsAction and then if a user chooses they can use the
full support of XWork. I'm not sure where you draw the line (you'd probably
want validation) but I cant see why you couldn't implement a few of the
On what framework would this solution you are describing run? Are you talking about running Struts 1.x actions inside
Action 2? If so, that is something that has been started in the sandbox, but not fully developed. I'd like to hear more.
Don
Eric Molitor wrote:
This may be a dumb
At 8:55 AM -0800 3/30/06, Don Brown wrote:
Are you talking about running Struts 1.x actions inside Action 2?
If so, that is something that has been started in the sandbox, but
not fully developed. I'd like to hear more.
Don:
where is this, exactly? and if you have the time, what's the
The code is in sandbox/ti/phase1/jars/legacy I believe, although I recently started moving it to sandbox/action2/legacy,
but got stuck trying to make a Maven 2 build work. The code is still in an exploratory stage, but there is conversion
code to turn Action 2 objects into Action 1
Well what I've been toying with is two things the first isn't directly
related but might be of interest.
At the SpringExperience there were some discussions about integrating
SpringWebflow into webwork and I started playing with some code. What I
ended up with was a weird WebFlowAction that could
Sure, a custom ActionInvocation instance could even invoke a Struts Action as is. The question is how you handle
ActionForms. Do you implement the Struts request processing chain as Interceptors? Add an Interceptor that calls a
chain? Action 2 already has the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor which
At 11:07 AM -0800 3/30/06, Don Brown wrote:
Sure, a custom ActionInvocation instance could even invoke a Struts
Action as is. The question is how you handle ActionForms. Do you
implement the Struts request processing chain as Interceptors? Add
an Interceptor that calls a chain? Action 2
On 3/30/06, Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don,
I was refering to phase I really, whether the starting point is Webwork or
Webwork + XWork.
I think Don is saying that it would be helpful to see a concrete
proposal from the XWork developers that outlines what they would like
to do. Once the
wanted, so I was free to try
new ideas much quicker.
Don
Thanks,
Gabe
- Original Message
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:22:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?
Gabe wrote:
I wanted to answer these two
Message
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:22:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?
On 3/25/06, Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I could come up with more reasons, but this is a good start to this
discussion
@struts.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:22:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?
On 3/25/06, Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I could come up with more reasons, but this is a good start to this
discussion.
I don't think anyone would have a problem with this, Gabe. It's just a
matter
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 06:03:56PM -0800, Gabe wrote:
I wanted to answer these two comments by Ted. Whether to bring XWork is a
very important decision to make ASAP, because it is about how we define
Struts Action 2.0.
Struts Action 2.0 = Webwork
- or -
Struts Action 2.0 = Webwork
On 3/25/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/25/06, Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I could come up with more reasons, but this is a good start to
this discussion.
I don't think anyone would have a problem with this, Gabe. It's just a
matter of whether we need to bring XWork
Gabe wrote:
I wanted to answer these two comments by Ted. Whether to bring XWork is a very
important decision to make ASAP, because it is about how we define Struts
Action 2.0.
Struts Action 2.0 = Webwork
- or -
Struts Action 2.0 = Webwork + XWork
While I'll let other XWork/WebWork folks
Don, I think this is totally at odds with a lot of the things I've been
reading lately. Granted its been hard to separate the facts from the
noise lately (through no fault of anyone involved with the merger), but
even still...
Can I make a suggestion? Certainly for the sake of the users in
On 3/30/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted threw out the idea to WebWork for their team to merge forces and work on
Ti
Well, Patrick mentioned in the Web alignment group that WebWork
would like to join forces with another project, and we went from
there. We discussed with Jason and
I think we're all still working off the original proposal.
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi
Don is simply referring to phase 2, while most of us are still
focused on phase 1.
-Ted.
On 3/30/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don, I think this is totally at odds with a lot
That's exactly what I had in mind, thanks for the reference. I see the
source of the confusion (phase I vs. II as you say). At least now I can
point people that ask me to the right place :)
Frank
Ted Husted wrote:
I think we're all still working off the original proposal.
*
To add to that, Patrick and I were collaborating on phase 2 type
features before we even thought of merging projects. After that
brainstorming session, I started talking to Patrick about one of the
ideas that came out of the conversion, like devMode, and Patrick
implemented it in WebWork. He
Hi! I don't think I have posted to this list yet. I am Gabe, XWork/Webwork
developer. Now that I see that discussions are starting about the merger I
wanted to bring up an issue that I brought up on the WW boards that was tabled
for just this moment (or after incubation?)
The issue is whether
On 3/25/06, Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I could come up with more reasons, but this is a good start to this
discussion.
I don't think anyone would have a problem with this, Gabe. It's just a
matter of whether we need to bring XWork and WebWork through
simultaneously, or whether we
24 matches
Mail list logo
