Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-08-01 Thread Laurie Harper
Wendy Smoak wrote: On 8/1/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My copy of mvn doesn't seem to think that download sources is an option :( You try it with -U to see if you've got the latest IDEA plugin. I forget when that was added. If not, depending on how much time you have to spend o

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-08-01 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/1/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My copy of mvn doesn't seem to think that download sources is an option :( You try it with -U to see if you've got the latest IDEA plugin. I forget when that was added. If not, depending on how much time you have to spend on this, my next step

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-08-01 Thread Ted Husted
My copy of mvn doesn't seem to think that download sources is an option :( -Ted. On 7/31/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/31/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have POMs and JARs dated for Monday afternoon, which sounds like > when we made the second pass, and I dont'

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-07-31 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/31/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just an idea... try running mvn idea:idea -downloadSources=true -downloadJavadocs=true -Papps which should download those files from the snapshot repo. OK, will do. Though, I need to stay focused on updates to MailReader for the rest of to

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-07-31 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/31/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have POMs and JARs dated for Monday afternoon, which sounds like when we made the second pass, and I dont' remember running a 1.x build since then. But the link mentions source JARS, and I don't see any source JARs. If I didn't assemble this on

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-07-31 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/30/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One of the links on the page I mentioned is to a script to sign everything in a directory structure, which should work if you still have the 'original' 1.3.5 build in your local repository: http://gleamynode.net/wordpress/archives/129 I have PO

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-07-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/30/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, then, since we have two votes for beta and one vote for GA, we can release this as a beta. First, a huge thank you to Ted for getting 1.3.5 done, and to everyone who helped get 1.3 to the point where it was possible. Since we intend a bro

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality - RESULT

2006-07-30 Thread Ted Husted
OK, then, since we have two votes for beta and one vote for GA, we can release this as a beta. Since we intend a broader distribution, mirroring seems appropriate. Unfortunately, the private key that I used to sign prior releases is no longer available, and I've totally forgotten how to do any of