2011/12/19 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org:
Actually, no, not quite.
A really, really long time ago, with early Struts 1 releases, we used
to designate quality with the initial build. We got out of that bad
habit quite a few years ago. The process I was referring to, which was
used for
Thanks for clarification but I'm still not sure if I get it right ;-)
So I can start a new release process as soon I want to but it can be
called an Alpha/Beta/GA build only because of Vote result ? I cannot
predetermine the result and say hey, lets release Beta1 ?
And if during the Vote, the
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:35:33 +0100, Łukasz Lenart
lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for clarification but I'm still not sure if I get it right ;-)
So I can start a new release process as soon I want to but it can be
called an Alpha/Beta/GA build only because of Vote result ? I cannot
2011/12/19 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
Thanks for clarification but I'm still not sure if I get it right ;-)
So I can start a new release process as soon I want to but it can be
called an Alpha/Beta/GA build only because of Vote result ? I cannot
predetermine the result and
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Rene Gielen gie...@it-neering.net wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:35:33 +0100, Łukasz Lenart
lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for clarification but I'm still not sure if I get it right ;-)
So I can start a new release process as soon I want to but it
I've moved the discussion to the new thread as to not mismatch two
different topics
2011/12/17 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org:
As a follow up, I've added one more point to the Release guide [1], is
it enough ?
That looks fine, as long as everyone is in agreement.
The question in my
or
not. So essentially, the difference for the release manager is one more
mail (announcing the test build) and some more patience (before casting
the vote).
But again, I fail to see improvement in doing this - as long as we agree
on testing seriously before voting.
- René
have announced 2.3.1 as test build, and if no clear
objections arose, cast a vote for exactly this binary to become GA or
not. So essentially, the difference for the release manager is one more
mail (announcing the test build) and some more patience (before casting
the vote).
Exactly. My
to
increment the version in order to prepare for next development iteration.
Thank you for your suggestion.
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 5 September 2011 16:40, Rene Gielen rene.gie...@googlemail.com wrote:
Maurizio,
great, thanks for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard
September 2011 16:40, Rene Gielen rene.gie...@googlemail.com wrote:
Maurizio,
great, thanks for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard way, as it is mostly always for the first time :)
While reading your posts and checking [1] I stumbled upon the branch
name
...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Maurizio,
great, thanks for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard way, as it is mostly always for the first time :)
While reading your posts and checking [1] I stumbled upon the branch
name to use.
Actually we should adjust When a serious
the version in order to prepare for next development
iteration.
Thank you for your suggestion.
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 5 September 2011 16:40, Rene Gielen rene.gie...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Maurizio,
great, thanks for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard
2011/9/7 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org:
Not yet, but I'm going to do. Needless to say that any help will be
appreciated :)
Just change the points in the doc that were different from what you did ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG
for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard way, as it is mostly always for the first time :)
While reading your posts and checking [1] I stumbled upon the branch
name to use.
Actually we should adjust When a serious security issue arises, we
should try to create
Hi Wendy,
I was talking about the 6,7,8 steps listed on http://s.apache.org/hb
and generally everything related to JIIRA, since I have no JIIRA admin
rights.
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 5 September 2011 01:59, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
I've asked INFRA if they can create such a group - struts-release-manager
I have rights to do it, but I don't know how :/
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/9/5 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi
-release-manager
I have rights to do it, but I don't know how :/
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/9/5 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org:
Hi Wendy,
I was talking about the 6,7,8 steps
-release-manager
I have rights to do it, but I don't know how :/
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/9/5 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org:
Hi Wendy,
I was talking about the 6,7,8 steps listed
Cucchiara
2011/9/5 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
I've asked INFRA if they can create such a group - struts-release-manager
I have rights to do it, but I don't know how :/
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Wendy,
I was talking about the 6,7,8 steps listed on http://s.apache.org/hb
and generally everything related to JIIRA, since I have no JIIRA admin
rights.
Okay, now I see you mean number 6, 7 and 8 under
Maurizio,
great, thanks for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard way, as it is mostly always for the first time :)
While reading your posts and checking [1] I stumbled upon the branch
name to use.
Actually we should adjust When a serious security issue arises, we
should
Wendy,
You are right, I realized that I shortened the wrong url (the one without
the anchor) late.
Sorry to wasted your time.
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 5 September 2011 13:37, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:38 AM,
Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
.
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 5 September 2011 16:40, Rene Gielen rene.gie...@googlemail.com wrote:
Maurizio,
great, thanks for jumping in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard way, as it is mostly always for the first time :)
While reading your posts and checking [1] I stumbled upon
in! You've earned your Release Manager Badge
the hard way, as it is mostly always for the first time :)
While reading your posts and checking [1] I stumbled upon the branch
name to use.
Actually we should adjust When a serious security issue arises, we
should try to create a #.#.#.1 branch from
Hi guys,
Struts 2.2.3.1 is on the way, anyway I am in doubt about the release process.
Could you review please the step I followed?
First I created a STRUTS_2_2_3_1 branch from the latest release
(STRUTS_2_2_3 tag).
After I realized that there is no way to use mvn release plugin, since
there was
Lukasz,
I am afraid I am not able to perform the 6,7,8 tasks illustrated on
http://s.apache.org/rel, since I have no enough karma.
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 4 September 2011 22:11, Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys,
Struts 2.2.3.1 is on the way, anyway I am in doubt about
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
Lukasz,
I am afraid I am not able to perform the 6,7,8 tasks illustrated on
http://s.apache.org/rel, since I have no enough karma.
Which steps do you mean? Any committer should be able to stage a
release and call
Hi Lukasz,
I would like, even if I have no idea where to start :)
Do you usually follow that guide [1]?
Have you any hint?
[1]
http://struts.apache.org/2.2.3/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-22x-distribution.html
Maurizio Cucchiara
2011/8/31 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
2011/8/31 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org:
Hi Lukasz,
I would like, even if I have no idea where to start :)
Do you usually follow that guide [1]?
Have you any hint?
[1]
http://struts.apache.org/2.2.3/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-22x-distribution.html
Yes, I based on that
Ted, I'll work on the 2.0.8 tickets for now. I'd like to resolve
everything on the 'Struts 2.0.8 TODO' page.
Next, I'd like to step up and release 2.0.8. At this time, I'm not
sure about a time table. I'll post back as soon as the time frame is
set.
Personally, I'm winding down
2007/4/26, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If we're not going on to 2.0.9, then the JIRA stuff is mainly done.
We'd just need to bulk-change whatever we don't close in 2.0.8 to
2.1.0.
Currently the Tiles 2 plugin depends on Tiles 2.0.1, but since Tiles
2.0.3 is going to be released (well in fact
If need be, we could also release a plugin separately. The JARs are
built separately, we just glom it all together as an administrative
convenience. If someone wanted to re-roll the Tiles plugin against a
new Tiles 2 build and call it release 2.0.8.1, that would be simple to
do.
On 4/26/07,
.
-Ted.
On 4/11/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone else interest in volunteering as the Struts 2.0.8 release manager.
I'll be spending some of my volunteer hours helping the Click
framework join the ASF, as one of the podling mentors, and I don't
want to stretch myself too thin
Is anyone else interest in volunteering as the Struts 2.0.8 release manager.
I'll be spending some of my volunteer hours helping the Click
framework join the ASF, as one of the podling mentors, and I don't
want to stretch myself too thin.
At this point, the release trigger would be a new XWork
What's the timeline for this release?
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 11, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
Is anyone else interest in volunteering as the Struts 2.0.8 release
manager.
I'll be spending some of my volunteer hours helping the Click
framework join the ASF, as one
as the Struts 2.0.8 release
manager.
I'll be spending some of my volunteer hours helping the Click
framework join the ASF, as one of the podling mentors, and I don't
want to stretch myself too thin.
At this point, the release trigger would be a new XWork 2 release. The
process is running smoothly
for this release?
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 11, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
Is anyone else interest in volunteering as the Struts 2.0.8 release
manager.
I'll be spending some of my volunteer hours helping the Click
framework join the ASF, as one of the podling mentors, and I
37 matches
Mail list logo
