Re: Codebehind issue?

2007-03-21 Thread Usama Rashwan
Hi Brian, did u checked this thread http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71257tstart=15 and Note , the struts.codebehind.defaultPackage is the package name defined in struts.xml not the real package name for example [code] struts package

Re: Codebehind issue?

2007-03-21 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Yeah, I've done some more investigation. The Struts docs are pretty lacking in general and I've brought up most of the doc issues before. I think there are still bugs out there for them. I'm hoping to help clean them up next week. I was supposed to start on a large project a few weeks ago that

Re: Codebehind issue?

2007-03-21 Thread Claus Ibsen
Brian you got enough memory setup for Maven? I have MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512m and have no problems. - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71861messageID=134516#134516

Re: Codebehind issue?

2007-03-21 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I use the default memory, which is 64 or 128 I think. However, I'm a little surprised that unit tests should be creating more than 64M worth of objects (minus the maven footprint). This seems like an issue to me. After each test case all test objects should be released. If a test creates a

Codebehind issue?

2007-03-20 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I haven't grabbed the code yet, but that is my next step. Just grabbed all the 2.0.6 JARs and I think I have a dependency issue or something. Anyone know off the top of their heads? java.lang.NullPointerException

Re: Codebehind issue?

2007-03-20 Thread Brian Pontarelli
This occurs when I add this declaration to my struts.properties: struts.codebehind.defaultPackage=com.texturemedia.prototype_webapp.action Removing it makes it work fine. This package does exist and there are classes in there. So, I'm not sure what is happening. -bp Brian Pontarelli wrote:

Re: Codebehind issue?

2007-03-20 Thread Dave Newton
--- Brian Pontarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: struts.codebehind.defaultPackage=com.texturemedia.prototype_webapp.action Just out of curiosity does it still break if it's a package w/o underscores? d. 8:00?