On 4/12/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (Yeah, I'm very late catching up...)
>
> On 3/28/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >I had very bad experiences with Dojo so far, and I brought this into
> > >discussion on ww forums. I wouldn't encourage moving to Dojo, becaus
I have some other things going on over the next few weeks that will mesh
nicely with documenting how to do this.
/Ian
Don Brown wrote:
I think the answer to all this is the built-in themes. Right now, I'm
proposing that the current themes use Dojo where an advanced widget is
needed, howeve
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/28/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex - I definately agree with you, somewhat ;) - if this is a simple
calendar,
or other lightweight widget there is no need to involve an ajax library
download. *Any* ajax library download. But I do think there is
On 3/28/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alex - I definately agree with you, somewhat ;) - if this is a simple
> calendar,
> or other lightweight widget there is no need to involve an ajax library
> download. *Any* ajax library download. But I do think there is a need
> for an
> aj
I think the answer to all this is the built-in themes. Right now, I'm
proposing that the current themes use Dojo where an advanced widget is
needed, however there could very well be a "prototype" theme, or the
user could replace the default head.ftl (that loads dojo) with their
own. Component
On 3/28/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/28/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have
> even
> > been thinking to add a new AJAX theme based on lighter solutions (a la
> > prototype).
>
> Heh,
On 3/28/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joe, I mostly agree with you. What I've been trying to say is that most of
> the user will not like to have a big dependency on Dojo for simple
> functionality like a calendar component.
The "size" of the dependency on Dojo is _complet
(Yeah, I'm very late catching up...)
On 3/28/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I had very bad experiences with Dojo so far, and I brought this into
> >discussion on ww forums. I wouldn't encourage moving to Dojo, because the
> >browser support is still lacking, and from the feeling
Alex - I definately agree with you, somewhat ;) - if this is a simple
calendar,
or other lightweight widget there is no need to involve an ajax library
download. *Any* ajax library download. But I do think there is a need for an
ajax theme when the user is ready to use one. So how do we defere
On 3/28/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have even
> been thinking to add a new AJAX theme based on lighter solutions (a la
> prototype).
Heh, and I considered Prototype too heavy (around 50K) to adopt for my
proje
Joe, I mostly agree with you. What I've been trying to say is that most of
the user will not like to have a big dependency on Dojo for simple
functionality like a calendar component. And I agree, this is my case too. I
would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have even
been
I had very bad experiences with Dojo so far, and I brought this into
discussion on ww forums. I wouldn't encourage moving to Dojo, because the
browser support is still lacking, and from the feeling we got from their ml
some of the old browsers, that are still used (f.e. IE 5.5) will be missing
in
12 matches
Mail list logo
