Re: Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-07-01 Thread Ted Husted
I created a ticket for this thread, so that we can pick it up after 1.3.5. * http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2897 -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-06-30 Thread Paul Benedict
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:That said, I don't think you should not do the work you describe, just because you may have to leave the Localizer (or whatever you call it) in the ServletContext under a well known key. It's just that it feels so outdated! Here's my solution. Unless

Re: Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-06-30 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 6/30/06, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:That said, I don't think you should not do the work you describe, just because you may have to leave the Localizer (or whatever you call it) in the ServletContext under a well known key. It's just that it

Re: Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-06-30 Thread Don Brown
If Struts 1 decided to go with Cintoo, I think it would be good for Struts 2 to adopt it as well, as it would make migration easier, and reduce the number of differences between the two versions. I'd like to take that approach with other areas like validation and annotations in the future.

Re: Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-06-30 Thread Ted Husted
Yes, but we should let one framework go first, and prove something works in practices, before adopting something new in both On 6/30/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If Struts 1 decided to go with Cintoo, I think it would be good for Struts 2 to adopt it as well, as it would make

Re: Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-06-30 Thread Paul Benedict
What does Clintoo do that standard ThreadLocal cannot? I am trying to understand the benefit here of this package. Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but we should let one framework go first, and prove something works in practices, before adopting something new in both On 6/30/06, Don

Re: Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-06-30 Thread Ted Husted
On 6/30/06, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not sure I understand this proposal. As far as I know this is already supported by WW and quite nicely. So, why would we want to add just another dependency? Well, Naill asked if Clintoo did anything that Struts 2 didn't already do

Re: Localization Bridge (was Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x)

2006-06-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On 6/30/06, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does Clintoo do that standard ThreadLocal cannot? I am trying to understand the benefit here of this package. For one thing, it introduces funky syntax that I personally dislike. ;-) Using '$' and '_' as method names isn't my idea of