I am +1 for that.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2009/4/13 Musachy Barroso :
>> I think we should keep it simple, what do you want to add?
>
> Conversion and validation example? The two most active topics on the
> list, I think ;-)
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Lukasz
> http://w
2009/4/13 Musachy Barroso :
> I think we should keep it simple, what do you want to add?
Conversion and validation example? The two most active topics on the
list, I think ;-)
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To u
I think we should keep it simple, what do you want to add?
musachy
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2009/4/11 Musachy Barroso :
>> The documentation is always under 2.x, when a release is done is that
>> the 2.x.y dirs are created. Btw I totally forgot to test the
>> Conve
2009/4/11 Musachy Barroso :
> The documentation is always under 2.x, when a release is done is that
> the 2.x.y dirs are created. Btw I totally forgot to test the
> Convention archetype.
I've been thinking to add more stuff to it (right now, only two
actions were implemented), but then it wouldn't
The documentation is always under 2.x, when a release is done is that
the 2.x.y dirs are created. Btw I totally forgot to test the
Convention archetype.
musahcy
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2009/4/9 Martin Cooper :
>> Done.
>
> Thanks, can I start with [1] as a templat
2009/4/9 Martin Cooper :
> Done.
Thanks, can I start with [1] as a template in the same branch (2.x) ?
> I didn't realise you'd submitted an iCLA, and I need to know to look for it
> at the time you file it. I see now that you mentioned filing an iCLA in two
> threads, but it would have been good
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2009/3/10 Lukasz Lenart :
> > The whole work is to checkout the current starter-archetype and
> > conventionize it? If so, I can do that and after all register it as a
> > issue with Jira, ok?
>
> I prepared the archetype but I want to also cr
2009/3/10 Lukasz Lenart :
> The whole work is to checkout the current starter-archetype and
> conventionize it? If so, I can do that and after all register it as a
> issue with Jira, ok?
I prepared the archetype but I want to also create some documentation
for it, could someone give me access to W
2009/3/10 Dave Newton :
>>> It's in the repo, I just haven't had any time to do the final prep work
>>> before a vote and release. I was doing to do a blank-convention archetype
>>> as
>>> well but am a bit overwhelmed with a new job at the moment.
>>
>> Ok, but is there Maven site with snapshot ar
Lukasz Lenart wrote:
2009/3/8 Dave Newton :
It's in the repo, I just haven't had any time to do the final prep work
before a vote and release. I was doing to do a blank-convention archetype as
well but am a bit overwhelmed with a new job at the moment.
Ok, but is there Maven site with snapshot
2009/3/8 Dave Newton :
> It's in the repo, I just haven't had any time to do the final prep work
> before a vote and release. I was doing to do a blank-convention archetype as
> well but am a bit overwhelmed with a new job at the moment.
Ok, but is there Maven site with snapshot archetypes to use
Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Any progress with this? There's a lot questions about Struts2
archetypes. I can prepare a new version but I don't want to duplicate
the work. I've been thinking about new archetype to show how to use
Convention plugin. Anybody is working on that (maybe)?
It's in the repo, I
Any progress with this? There's a lot questions about Struts2
archetypes. I can prepare a new version but I don't want to duplicate
the work. I've been thinking about new archetype to show how to use
Convention plugin. Anybody is working on that (maybe)?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.p
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
wrote:
I'm planning on preparing a release of the portlet archetype, so I'm
wondering about the same thing. Do the archetypes need a vote first?
Yes, anything we release needs a vote first.
Oops.
In mad rush right
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
wrote:
> I'm planning on preparing a release of the portlet archetype, so I'm
> wondering about the same thing. Do the archetypes need a vote first?
Yes, anything we release needs a vote first.
--
Wendy
---
I'm planning on preparing a release of the portlet archetype, so I'm
wondering about the same thing. Do the archetypes need a vote first?
Nils-H
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> How do I get this to a repo, anyway?
>
> Dave
>
> Dave Newton wrote:
>>
>> I've checked in a (most
How do I get this to a repo, anyway?
Dave
Dave Newton wrote:
I've checked in a (mostly) working updated blank-archetype.
There's a new archetypes doc page at [1], along with a more detailed
look at the blank archetype itself at [2] that talks a bit about Maven
and the blank app itself.
The
I've checked in a (mostly) working updated blank-archetype.
There's a new archetypes doc page at [1], along with a more detailed
look at the blank archetype itself at [2] that talks a bit about Maven
and the blank app itself.
There are some archetype issues I'm a little fuzzy on, including bu
18 matches
Mail list logo
