On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
available to evaluate for release quality.
[RESULT]
This vote for Struts 1.3.5 quality resulted in:
Binding votes from PMC members:
GA: Don Brown, James Mitchell
Beta: Wendy
Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I
thought I was ::scratches head::.
Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
available to evaluate for release quality.
On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I
thought I
was ::scratches head::.
It's the PMC votes that are binding. In the normal course, we usually
invite a committer to join the PMC after six months or so.
Thanks Ted. I understand better now. I still think 1.3.5 is great!
Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict
wrote:
Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I
thought I
was ::scratches head::.
It's the PMC votes that are binding. In
I have successfully converted over a very large application to Struts 1.3.5.
The backwards compatibility is amazing, and I also had no problems using the
old request processor. Really, I am impressed and didn't expect it to go this
smooth, and I just want to say congratulations and good job for
+1 GA -- Looks great!!!
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 6, 2006, at 12:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
available to evaluate for release quality.
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/
It has also been deployed
On 8/11/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 GA -- Looks great!!!
LOL. No fair voting twice, James :)
As it stands, we have two beta and two GA.
Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited to vote,
binding or not.
-Ted.
Doh! I couldn't remember if I had sent that in.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 11, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 8/11/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 GA -- Looks great!!!
LOL. No fair voting twice, James :)
As it stands, we have two beta and two GA.
+1 GA non-binding. Been using 1.3.5 successfully in my app.
\Anders
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted Husted
Sent: 11. august 2006 15:07
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/11/06
+1 Beta
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:48 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Same reasons as before. :)
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html
This
+1 for GA
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Same reasons as before. :)
*
Finally had a chance to go through this.
+1 for GA
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Don Brown wrote:
+1 for GA
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a
13 matches
Mail list logo
