Go ahead with it, thanks for volunteering.
musachy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
> Still no objections so far. I would volunteer to help with IP clearance
>
> Musachy Barroso schrieb:
>> Just to recap on this (no, I won't let this go stale ;) ), we have a
>> consensus on usi
Still no objections so far. I would volunteer to help with IP clearance
Musachy Barroso schrieb:
> Just to recap on this (no, I won't let this go stale ;) ), we have a
> consensus on using JQuery as the underlying framework for the ajax
> tags, and we agree that we could use this project. Is there
Just to recap on this (no, I won't let this go stale ;) ), we have a
consensus on using JQuery as the underlying framework for the ajax
tags, and we agree that we could use this project. Is there any
objection against starting the IP clearance process, any volunteers to
help with this? (assuming th
First and foremost, I totally agree that we should avoid to have a
driven-by-excitement attitude on this topic, and develop a reasonable
consensus and plan. See further comments inline
Martin Cooper schrieb:
I'm here, and I've been following along. I just haven't had time to
consolidate my tho
Don,
nope, that fault we did once before in webwork and early s2 releases :)
The jQuery plugin should be/get one of the core plugins, not part of the
struts2-core artifact.
Rainer
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Rainer Hermanns
> wrote:
>> I'm really happy, that Johannes implemented this plug
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Don Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
>> I'm really happy, that Johannes implemented this plugin and it is now
>> ready to use and I will definitely use it.
>> If we bring it into Struts2 core, I'm also willing to support this pl
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> I'm really happy, that Johannes implemented this plugin and it is now
> ready to use and I will definitely use it.
> If we bring it into Struts2 core, I'm also willing to support this plugin
> and help to maintain and extend the functionalit
Ok I added a page to the wiki with what I think we have
discussed/agreed so far, and the things we need to do:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S2WIKI/JQuery+Ajax+Tags+Plugin+Proposal
So far we all agree that we need a small set of tags that covers the
simple uses cases, and that it is
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 10:45:37 pm Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>
> What a curious statement. The very reason the ASF focuses on the use of
> mailing lists, as opposed to things like IRC, is to make sure to *include*
> people from all geographical locations. Can you elaborate on what makes it
> hard fo
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Eric's plugin is becoming somewhat mature as well, but due to his
> geographical
> location it is hard for him to participate in the mailing lists.
What a curious statement. The very reason the ASF focuses on the use of
mailing lists,
I'm here, and I've been following along. I just haven't had time to
consolidate my thoughts until now.
First of all, I hope everyone recognises that it's by no means my call; it's
the team's call.
The subject of Ajax tags in Struts 2 has been hotly discussed over a period
of years. At different p
I have only one concern about this. We can't give commit rights to the
sandbox only, so the original authors will not have commit rights. How
has this been done before?
musachy
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
>
>
> Obinna wrote:
>>
>> - We need to be clear on what bits o
Obinna wrote:
>
> - We need to be clear on what bits of jquery we will support (this is
> mainly about widgets) - I like the initial suggestion to support only the
> 'officially' released widgets as tempting as it may be to support some
> other
> cool ones. I think this will help prevent some o
I'll happily submit the topics stuff as a patch but it's not *quite* that
straight-forward as there's a bit of structural code (albeit all in one .js)
file for it as well. I think we do need that strategy/design discussion
before we proceed.
Some initial thoughts:
- I think it is much better to m
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
[snip]
> Here is my +1, but maybe we should call a formal vote on this?
>
I don't think we need a vote, the only person (voice of reason) so far
was Martin. I would say that if you're listening Martin, chime in and
let us know if we've convin
Hi,
the implementation looks really awesome and I'd really like to see this
plugin in the core of Struts2. When we talked about the simple ajax tags
we want to build, we were already talking about jQuery as the foundation.
I'm really happy, that Johannes implemented this plugin and it is now
read
Musachy Barroso schrieb:
> +1 for combining efforts. Eric, could you submit the topics stuff as a
> patch for Johannes' plugin?
>
> I would like for us to define some strategy for this, and don't let
> drag for months. Do we all agree that bringing this into the sandbox
> is a good idea then?
>
+
+1 for combining efforts. Eric, could you submit the topics stuff as a
patch for Johannes' plugin?
I would like for us to define some strategy for this, and don't let
drag for months. Do we all agree that bringing this into the sandbox
is a good idea then?
musachy
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:00 A
I haven't looked at the code for the jquery plugin yet, but I can offer
some insight into the problems with the dojo integration. At the time
of writing, dojo was the most mature framework out there. The problems
we encountered was with JS programming model that dojo used as well as a
strong inte
I think also that a modern web framework like struts2 needs AJAX support.
And every second struts2 user use the AJAX functionality of struts2
or code it with hand.
When I take a look in the download history I feel confirmed that many users
want AJAX functionality.
I can also help to support and
I agree with Renee, Wes et al that having some kind of 'official' ajax
plugin is almost a requirement for a serious UI framework as serious now.
I've used ajax feature pretty heavily on the last 4 projects (all using
struts) I've worked on. The first two using dojo, and the last two using a
homegro
I am also a jquery user, so I can help support this.
musachy
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> [thread snip]
>
> I looked through the code and it is fairly straightforward. There are
> Components, Beans and freemarker files. I didn't notice anything overly
> complex
> in
[thread snip]
I looked through the code and it is fairly straightforward. There are
Components, Beans and freemarker files. I didn't notice anything overly complex
in the build process. It looks like Johannes used eclipse, but setup the
source tree just like any maven project (src/main/java, sr
On Sunday 26 July 2009 08:12:05 am Rene Gielen wrote:
> That is what I also regognize from the disussions a while ago.
>
> We all know that the Dojo tags turned out as a nightmare. Dojo looked
> promising back in these days, with all it's supporters and some good
> solutions when there were only fe
That is what I also regognize from the disussions a while ago.
We all know that the Dojo tags turned out as a nightmare. Dojo looked
promising back in these days, with all it's supporters and some good
solutions when there were only few alternative frameworks around.
Nevertheless, not only the pro
A while back we said that we would remove the "ajax built in" from the
feature list if we didn't find a replacement for the Dojo tags. Some
work was done on a jquery plugin by Wes, and I think I dropped 1 line
of code somewhere, but is hasn't got far, but we do want simple ajax
tags to replace the
of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
subsidiaries.
-Original Message-
From: mfncoo...@gmail.com [mailto:mfncoo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Cooper
Sent: 24 July 2009 19:48
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts2 jQuery Plugin - Logo
Whoa. Before we go r
Whoa. Before we go rushing off gung ho to include this as part of Struts
itself, shall we re-discuss the topic that, right now, applies to this
plugin just as much as to the Dojo tags?
I mean, of course, the fact that we specifically decided that we didn't want
to support a specific AJAX library a
The CLA is available here -
http://apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
It is an agreement that you are granting the Apache foundation the use
of your intellectual property as it pertains to source code
contributions. You should read through it and make sure that you are
comfortable with the conditions l
We were so excited about your plugin that we forgot to kindly ask if you
would not mind us integrating it into Struts 2.
Thanks for giving this positive feedback _before_ we asked ;-)
CLA = Contributor License Agreements
See
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
- René
Johannes Geppert schrieb:
I
I have no problem when this code will be integrated into struts2.
But maybe someone with good skills in Struts2 and in JavaScript should take
a look at the sources. Because this is my first struts2 plugin.
What means "fill out the CLA" ? I don't know what the CLA is.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
true. I get very excited about killing dead code (looking at you dojo tags)
musachy
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> For a contribution this size, we should probably have Johannes fill
> out the CLA. Although, I haven't seen his opinion on the matter. If
> Johannes wants
For a contribution this size, we should probably have Johannes fill
out the CLA. Although, I haven't seen his opinion on the matter. If
Johannes wants to let us absorb it, I volunteer now to start working
on the tests.
-Wes
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> That looks exc
That looks excellent, great work. I am big +1 for bringing this in.
About what Wes said, if there is only one author and the license is
ASL 2, it shouldn't be hard to bring it it (zip it and attach code to
jira?). For the unit tests I am also big +1 for selenium tests.
musachy
On Fri, Jul 24, 200
I'd rather consider trying to bring this into the main struts distro.
I didn't look at the code, but if other devs are interested in this
route, we have to consider the following -
IP Clearance
Our testing policy
I think we can handle the IP clearance, as long as we know it's a step
we'd have to
Rene Gielen wrote:
>
> Brilliant work! I would love to see this integrated in S2 distribution,
> if possible. Did you already setup a maven repo location for it? If not,
> let me know if you need help to add a repo space to your google code svn
> area.
>
I'am glad that you like the plugin. I do
+1
Cool work
--Original Message--
From: Rene Gielen
To: Struts Developers List
ReplyTo: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts2 jQuery Plugin - Logo
Sent: Jul 24, 2009 19:42
Brilliant work! I would love to see this integrated in S2 distribution,
if possible. Did you already setup a
Brilliant work! I would love to see this integrated in S2 distribution,
if possible. Did you already setup a maven repo location for it? If not,
let me know if you need help to add a repo space to your google code svn
area.
Day one of the death of the dojo tags :)
- René
Johannes Geppert schrieb
rom: Philip Luppens [mailto:philip.lupp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 July 2009 12:16
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts2 jQuery Plugin - Logo
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> today I release the Version 1.0 of the Struts2 jQuery Plugin see
> http:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> today I release the Version 1.0 of the Struts2 jQuery Plugin see
> http://code.google.com/p/struts2-jquery/
>
> or Showcase
> http://www.weinfreund.de/struts2-jquery-showcase/index.action
... damn, that looks excellent.
Phil
40 matches
Mail list logo
