On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:52:23 -0700 (PDT), David Graham wrote:
> IMO, Struts 2.0 is a good time to leave the old tags (defined as
> ones with JSTL replacements) behind. Struts 1.x apps would still
> have them available but 2.x apps would use the JSTL. I consider it
> a disservice to the communtity
-- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 8:05 PM
> Subject: RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for
> submitting
>
>
> > I'm not trying t
don't know why you think it is
> >important. I guess I just disagree.
> >
> >Sorry to have made the posting.
> >
> >Edgar
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2
y opinions heard, right or wrong.
From: Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for
submitting
Dat
From: Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for
submitting
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:12:
Michael Rasmussen said:
> I think I would go the other way with this. In "my" perfect struts world
> there would be no struts tags at all.
+1
> Struts would have no clue as to what
> you were using as the presentation layer. (JSP, Swing, WML)
...
or Velocity :)
> Put them in jakarta-taglibs an
;Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for
submitting
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:24:48 -0400
I know I will get ignored or flamed on this, but here I go. My apologies
in
advance if I offend anyone.
Before I start, I have mad
I actually agree with everything that you've said. I just have one
issue. The struts tag libs are still heavily used, and haven't been
deprecated. If they aren't part of the core struts package, then they
should be deprecated and moved to a different project.
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:21:25 -0700
Well said Niall. IMO, tags with any of the following properties don't
belong in Struts:
1. They don't interact with core Struts resources/framework.
2. They use javascript that may not work in all browsers.
3. They generate non-standard HTML.
4. They duplicate functionality already available i
Comments in line.
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Breese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for
submitting
I completely agree with your statements regarding a javascript
requirement. My only issue is a strict user interface issue. Meaning
that the current implementation goes against user interface
guidelines, specifically that "enter" should submit a form, not cancel
it.
Perhaps the entire thing coul
You're not out of line at all - this list is the place to discuss
enhancement requests and requests which come with a patch attached are more
welcome than those without :-)
Having said that, I'm against this change. If the user disables javascript
in their browser then the cancel button no longer
12 matches
Mail list logo
