Au Contraire! Thanks for taking care of this so quickly.
Don
James Mitchell wrote:
Sorry for "shoot first and ask questions later". Does anyone care to
comment?
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 26, 2006, at 11:01 AM, James Mitchell wrote:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Sorry for "shoot first and ask questions later". Does anyone care to
comment?
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 26, 2006, at 11:01 AM, James Mitchell wrote:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The struts.apache.org website is being published by someone
doing an scp without the
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The struts.apache.org website is being published by someone
doing an scp without the proper group permissions. The publication
caused the download.cgi permission to become 644 (instead of 775),
thus breaking the mirror process. I have fixed
On the topic of anchors, I changed my mind. Again. I had originally
planned to preserve as many URLs as possible, including the anchor names.
But then I decided to just go with whatever Maven came up with, which is the
text of the section name with spaces and special characters replaced by
un
On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new
> >> sub-project?
>
> > None at all. As Ted mentioned, that was the original plan. :-)
>
> NOW you tell me. ;)
Sorry about that
On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new
> >> sub-project?
>
> > None at all. As Ted mentioned, that was the original plan. :-)
>
> NOW you tell me. ;) As you probably sa
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new
sub-project?
None at all. As Ted mentioned, that was the original plan. :-)
NOW you tell me. ;) As you probably saw, James set up the new directory in
the repository.
I'm not sure h
On 8/12/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would say just remove the tags. When I was messing around
> with this a few months ago, that's what I did, and everything else
> seemed to work out just fine. I have no concerns about any limitations
> of the Maven format if we're going t
On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I've done some work in DocBook, and it's not so bad, expecially since
> > there are some editors out there, like XML Mind.
> >
> > I don't suppose just plain-old XHTML is an option?
>
> You want to m
On 8/12/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick related question about the website. Are the xdocs used by
> forrest compatible with the xdocs used by Maven? If not, do you know
> what portion of them can be salvaged if any?
I have no idea how the two xdocs formats relate to each ot
On 8/11/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > One remaining concern about the website conversion: If I copy the files
> > into build/xdocs, what happens when someone checks out struts/current and
> > gets the 'build' directory within every subproj
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've done some work in DocBook, and it's not so bad, expecially since
there are some editors out there, like XML Mind.
I don't suppose just plain-old XHTML is an option?
You want to maintain the actual HTML with the and class="indent"> tags rather than
On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I'm trying to avoid having
> to maintain a custom stylesheet, and looking at options such as DocBook to
> generate some of the docs. (The User Guide in particular already has
> tags in it-- I think it
From: "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quick related question about the website. Are the xdocs used by
forrest compatible with the xdocs used by Maven? If not, do you know
what portion of them can be salvaged if any?
Maven's 'multiproject:site' goal uses the Jakarta xdocs format:
http://
Quick related question about the website. Are the xdocs used by
forrest compatible with the xdocs used by Maven? If not, do you know
what portion of them can be salvaged if any?
TIA,
sean
ps. I'm not trying to reopen the maven discussion here, just looking
for some info on how the website is g
On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new sub-project?
I believe we may have contemplated that from the beginning. Site was
to be our "seventh dwarf", along with Apps, Core, EL, Plugins,
Taglibs, and Tiles. :)
We left the
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One remaining concern about the website conversion: If I copy the files
into build/xdocs, what happens when someone checks out struts/current and
gets the 'build' directory within every subproject? I have a feeling it's
going to retrieve all that docume
One remaining concern about the website conversion: If I copy the files
into build/xdocs, what happens when someone checks out struts/current and
gets the 'build' directory within every subproject? I have a feeling it's
going to retrieve all that documentation a dozen times, once for each
sub
Excellent work, Wendy. I know you've done a great deal of work
on this and we all appreciate it. Even if you are using Maven.
david
Le 05-08-11 à 07:25, Wendy Smoak a écrit :
Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions for the new site.
Here's a
second draft, incorporating as many of the su
Very nice! The only thing I noticed is could the author, see also, etc.
metadata for a document be placed at the bottom instead of the top? Now
that we are rendering that, I'll need to go clean it up :)
Thanks again!
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions for th
Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions for the new site. Here's a
second draft, incorporating as many of the suggestions as I could get to:
http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/site-test/index.html
- Navigation to subprojects is now consolidated near the top of the menu.
- If
+1 for me to.
A few notes might be:
* The Download links could point to anchors on the Acquiring page, to
provide a single gateway.
* In the end, I expect we would have a single Subprojects or Projects
section, instead of two. For subproject labels, I would suggest
dropping "Struts" as understo
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do you know how that affects the generation of the tld files? Or is it a
non-issue (meaning that hasn't changed)
I don't know yet. I noticed that the html taglib docs are missing from the
test site, and it's on the list to check out. (The tlds hav
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Another thing I was trying to tackle - which, in retrospect, was much
too big to do in one chunk, let alone with everything else too - was
creating a completely generic "main site" that hands off to the
sub-project sites, where the main site doesn't get
On 8/9/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I do have the same question as James, though: Can we still generate
> >the TLDs from the same XML as the taglib docs? This is one place that
> >I got bogged down, since it seemed that Maven wouldn't take the extra
> >XML elements, and I would ab
I do have the same question as James, though: Can we still generate
the TLDs from the same XML as the taglib docs? This is one place that
I got bogged down, since it seemed that Maven wouldn't take the extra
XML elements, and I would absolutely hate to lose the guaranteed
synchronisation we get fr
On 8/9/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In keeping with the Maven-or-Ant thread, it's time to think about switching
> to the Maven-generated multi-project website. James has had the "basic"
> Maven-generated site available for a while now with the nightly builds.
>
> I made a start on
Good stuff! I was fiddling around with trying to generate the site
with Maven a while ago, but I think I was trying to kill too many
birds with the same stone, so to speak. Tackling it as you have seems
like a more expedient approach.
I do have the same question as James, though: Can we still gene
Agreed, this looks great! Not knowing much about Maven, I wasn't sure
what would happen to the user guide and other such docs. Now I see I
don't need to worry about those. Good work!
Hubert
On 8/9/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the hard work Wendy. This looks g
Thanks for all the hard work Wendy. This looks great!
Do you know how that affects the generation of the tld files? Or is it a
non-issue (meaning that hasn't changed)
I am +1 for moving over to this approach. My +1 also means that I am
willing to help (which I guess I sort of already have
30 matches
Mail list logo
