On 6/22/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By the way, I am volunteering to continue adding features to 1.x. Michael says he is
also. I read today Niall is too. Who else on the team still wishes to add features for
this codebase? Just looking to know who is on the "inner team".
Oop
Thanks Wendy, I've upgraded both.
Niall
On 6/25/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Commons FileUpload[1] and Chain[2] have both had recent releases
> (Chain 1.1 and FileUpload 1.1.1) - we don't need to have these new
> releases a
On 6/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Commons FileUpload[1] and Chain[2] have both had recent releases
(Chain 1.1 and FileUpload 1.1.1) - we don't need to have these new
releases as the minimum dependency for Struts but there are two bug
fixes which are (IMO) useful:
Niall, I
On 6/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also keep in mind that we are about to roll a 1.3.5 release, and we
might not want to do anything to delay the 1.3.x series. Of course,
there's also the idea of starting a branch for 1.4.
Commons FileUpload[1] and Chain[2] have both had recent r
On 6/22/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Umm, before the flame starts, I do not want to check in that exact
code that is linked to a page. But I consider it is at least 80% ready
;-) I have not reimplemented couple of features that JSP Controls
library has like triggering event vi
It's simply a matter of when someone can roll it. Wendy's and Niall
both wanted to do it, but ran shy of time. I can do it in the first
part of July, but not before. Right now, Frank is preparing some
"checkstyle" fixes. (All of which has been discussed on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everything is deci
Hey Paul,
I'm interested in seeing Struts 1.x maintained as well and will contribute time
to
that effort.
James
On Thu Jun 22 20:22 , Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>What is the status of 1.3.5? It sounds like it's almost baked.
>
>
>
>By the way, I am volunteering to continue addi
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:36:47PM -0700, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Well... What are the ramifications of removing bugzilla? Can we just
> get rid of any bugzilla links we have on our site? Advertise jira.
A better solution would be to modify Bugzilla to let users know when a
bug has been superceded.
I will be helping with *all* of Struts (1.2.x, 1.3.x, 2.0 and Shale)
for quite some time. I ain't going anywhere!
--
James Mitchell
On Jun 22, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
What is the status of 1.3.5? It sounds like it's almost baked.
By the way, I am volunteering to continu
I didn't pay attention to the JIRA migration, but I thought all bugzilla
tickets were imported to JIRA. If that's true, do old email links matter? I
mean, bugzilla won't be the eternal bug system -- eventually it will be
displaced.
Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/22/06, Paul Bened
On 6/22/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well... What are the ramifications of removing bugzilla?
Not sure what you mean by this. There's a great deal of history in there,
and thousands of references into it from mail threads, etc. I wouldn't want
to see that go away.
Can we just
Well... What are the ramifications of removing bugzilla? Can we just get rid of
any bugzilla links we have on our site? Advertise jira.
Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/22/06, Paul Benedict
wrote:
>
> What is the status of 1.3.5? It sounds like it's almost baked.
>
> By the way, I
On 6/22/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the status of 1.3.5? It sounds like it's almost baked.
By the way, I am volunteering to continue adding features to 1.x. Michael
says he is also. I read today Niall is too. Who else on the team still
wishes to add features for this co
On 6/22/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just created a first draft of what I envision as part of updated 1.3
documentation that describes new features for 1.3 ;-)
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsComponents
The WAR file is attached, see the bottom of the page. The WAR cont
On 6/22/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the status of 1.3.5? It sounds like it's almost baked.
By the way, I am volunteering to continue adding features to 1.x. Michael says he is
also. I read today Niall is too. Who else on the team still wishes to add features for
this c
What is the status of 1.3.5? It sounds like it's almost baked.
By the way, I am volunteering to continue adding features to 1.x. Michael says
he is also. I read today Niall is too. Who else on the team still wishes to add
features for this codebase? Just looking to know who is on the "inner tea
16 matches
Mail list logo
