Re: struts website issues

Au Contraire! Thanks for taking care of this so quickly. Don James Mitchell wrote: Sorry for "shoot first and ask questions later". Does anyone care to comment? -- James Mitchell On Apr 26, 2006, at 11:01 AM, James Mitchell wrote: On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

Re: struts website issues

Sorry for "shoot first and ask questions later". Does anyone care to comment? -- James Mitchell On Apr 26, 2006, at 11:01 AM, James Mitchell wrote: On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: The struts.apache.org website is being published by someone doing an scp without the

Re: struts website issues

On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: The struts.apache.org website is being published by someone doing an scp without the proper group permissions. The publication caused the download.cgi permission to become 644 (instead of 775), thus breaking the mirror process. I have fixed

struts website issues

The struts.apache.org website is being published by someone doing an scp without the proper group permissions. The publication caused the download.cgi permission to become 644 (instead of 775), thus breaking the mirror process. I have fixed both issues for now, but they will break again the next

[jira] Moved: (SHALE-129) [Shale] Struts Website Features

: (was: Nightly Build) Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > [Shale] Struts Website Features > --- > > Key: SHALE-129 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-129 > Project: Shale >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35332] - [Shale] Struts Website Features

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35332] - [Shale] Struts Website Features

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts website

On the topic of anchors, I changed my mind. Again. I had originally planned to preserve as many URLs as possible, including the anchor names. But then I decided to just go with whatever Maven came up with, which is the text of the section name with spaces and special characters replaced by un

Re: Struts website

On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new > >> sub-project? > > > None at all. As Ted mentioned, that was the original plan. :-) > > NOW you tell me. ;) Sorry about that

Re: Struts website

On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new > >> sub-project? > > > None at all. As Ted mentioned, that was the original plan. :-) > > NOW you tell me. ;) As you probably sa

Re: Struts website

From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new sub-project? None at all. As Ted mentioned, that was the original plan. :-) NOW you tell me. ;) As you probably saw, James set up the new directory in the repository. I'm not sure h

Re: Struts website

On 8/12/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would say just remove the tags. When I was messing around > with this a few months ago, that's what I did, and everything else > seemed to work out just fine. I have no concerns about any limitations > of the Maven format if we're going t

Re: Struts website

On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I've done some work in DocBook, and it's not so bad, expecially since > > there are some editors out there, like XML Mind. > > > > I don't suppose just plain-old XHTML is an option? > > You want to m

Re: Struts website

On 8/12/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quick related question about the website. Are the xdocs used by > forrest compatible with the xdocs used by Maven? If not, do you know > what portion of them can be salvaged if any? I have no idea how the two xdocs formats relate to each ot

Re: Struts website

On 8/11/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > One remaining concern about the website conversion: If I copy the files > > into build/xdocs, what happens when someone checks out struts/current and > > gets the 'build' directory within every subproj

Re: Struts website

From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I've done some work in DocBook, and it's not so bad, expecially since there are some editors out there, like XML Mind. I don't suppose just plain-old XHTML is an option? You want to maintain the actual HTML with the and class="indent"> tags rather than

Re: Struts website

On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I'm trying to avoid having > to maintain a custom stylesheet, and looking at options such as DocBook to > generate some of the docs. (The User Guide in particular already has > tags in it-- I think it

Re: Struts website

From: "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Quick related question about the website. Are the xdocs used by forrest compatible with the xdocs used by Maven? If not, do you know what portion of them can be salvaged if any? Maven's 'multiproject:site' goal uses the Jakarta xdocs format: http://

Re: Struts website

Quick related question about the website. Are the xdocs used by forrest compatible with the xdocs used by Maven? If not, do you know what portion of them can be salvaged if any? TIA, sean ps. I'm not trying to reopen the maven discussion here, just looking for some info on how the website is g

Re: Struts website

On 8/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any objections to having 'site' or 'website' as a new sub-project? I believe we may have contemplated that from the beginning. Site was to be our "seventh dwarf", along with Apps, Core, EL, Plugins, Taglibs, and Tiles. :) We left the

Re: Struts website

From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> One remaining concern about the website conversion: If I copy the files into build/xdocs, what happens when someone checks out struts/current and gets the 'build' directory within every subproject? I have a feeling it's going to retrieve all that docume

Re: Struts website

One remaining concern about the website conversion: If I copy the files into build/xdocs, what happens when someone checks out struts/current and gets the 'build' directory within every subproject? I have a feeling it's going to retrieve all that documentation a dozen times, once for each sub

Re: Struts website

Excellent work, Wendy. I know you've done a great deal of work on this and we all appreciate it. Even if you are using Maven. david Le 05-08-11 à 07:25, Wendy Smoak a écrit : Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions for the new site. Here's a second draft, incorporating as many of the su

Re: Struts website

Very nice! The only thing I noticed is could the author, see also, etc. metadata for a document be placed at the bottom instead of the top? Now that we are rendering that, I'll need to go clean it up :) Thanks again! Don Wendy Smoak wrote: Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions for th

Re: Struts website

Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions for the new site. Here's a second draft, incorporating as many of the suggestions as I could get to: http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/site-test/index.html - Navigation to subprojects is now consolidated near the top of the menu. - If

Re: Struts website

+1 for me to. A few notes might be: * The Download links could point to anchors on the Acquiring page, to provide a single gateway. * In the end, I expect we would have a single Subprojects or Projects section, instead of two. For subproject labels, I would suggest dropping "Struts" as understo

Re: Struts website

From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Do you know how that affects the generation of the tld files? Or is it a non-issue (meaning that hasn't changed) I don't know yet. I noticed that the html taglib docs are missing from the test site, and it's on the list to check out. (The tlds hav

Re: Struts website

From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Another thing I was trying to tackle - which, in retrospect, was much too big to do in one chunk, let alone with everything else too - was creating a completely generic "main site" that hands off to the sub-project sites, where the main site doesn't get

Re: Struts website

On 8/9/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I do have the same question as James, though: Can we still generate > >the TLDs from the same XML as the taglib docs? This is one place that > >I got bogged down, since it seemed that Maven wouldn't take the extra > >XML elements, and I would ab

Re: Struts website

I do have the same question as James, though: Can we still generate the TLDs from the same XML as the taglib docs? This is one place that I got bogged down, since it seemed that Maven wouldn't take the extra XML elements, and I would absolutely hate to lose the guaranteed synchronisation we get fr

Re: Struts website

On 8/9/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In keeping with the Maven-or-Ant thread, it's time to think about switching > to the Maven-generated multi-project website. James has had the "basic" > Maven-generated site available for a while now with the nightly builds. > > I made a start on

Re: Struts website

Good stuff! I was fiddling around with trying to generate the site with Maven a while ago, but I think I was trying to kill too many birds with the same stone, so to speak. Tackling it as you have seems like a more expedient approach. I do have the same question as James, though: Can we still gene

Re: Struts website

- Original Message - > From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:28 AM > Subject: Struts website > > > > In keeping with the Maven-or-Ant thread, it's time to think about > &g

Re: Struts website

IL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:28 AM Subject: Struts website In keeping with the Maven-or-Ant thread, it's time to think about switching to the Maven-generated multi-project website. James has had the "basic" Maven-gen

Struts website

In keeping with the Maven-or-Ant thread, it's time to think about switching to the Maven-generated multi-project website. James has had the "basic" Maven-generated site available for a while now with the nightly builds. I made a start on integrating the existing site with Maven's, and posted the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35332] - [Shale] Struts Website Features

|FIXED Summary|[Shale] Struts Website |[Shale] Struts Website |Features|Features --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-12 06:49 --- Added in nightly build 20050612. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35332] - [Shale] Struts Website Features

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35332] New: - [Shale] Struts Website Features

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35332 Summary: [Shale] Struts Website Features Product: Struts Version: Nightly Build Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Documen

Re: Building Struts Website

Thanks, and done. Let me know if there is anything I missed. Don Ted Husted wrote: Never mind. I ran svnpasswd on the new machine, and now everything works :) So, Don, you can make the changes, use core/build-site.xml to rebuild the site, and scp it up to /www/struts.apache.org. -T. On Thu, 17

Re: Building Struts Website

Never mind. I ran svnpasswd on the new machine, and now everything works :) So, Don, you can make the changes, use core/build-site.xml to rebuild the site, and scp it up to /www/struts.apache.org. -T. On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:20:48 -0500, Ted Husted wrote: > OK, I'm still  having trouble committi

Re: Building Struts Website

OK, I'm still having trouble committing from this machine, so I added the stopgap build file through bugzilla. * http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33617 If anyone want's to jump in and help setup the Struts subprojects as Maven builds, I'm sure Martin, James, et al, will apprec

Re: Building Struts Website

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:30:09 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote: > My thinking was that we'd have 'site' + all subprojects, where > 'core' would  play in the same way as other subprojects. Since that > will involve separating 'site' files from 'core' files, I'd prefer, > in the interim, to build the site f

Re: Building Struts Website

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:17:24 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:42:36 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > > I know I haven't been keeping up on this as I should have, but > > wasn't Martin reworking all the Ant scripts? Perhaps website > > building was included? > > > > Do

Re: Building Struts Website

be doing that now. > >>> Building the Struts site would then be something like building > >>> the Jakarta Commons site. > >>> > >> > >> Well, that gets us back into the Maven vs. Ant debate. I'd imagine > >> we

Re: Building Struts Website

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:42:36 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > I know I haven't been keeping up on this as I should have, but > wasn't Martin reworking all the Ant scripts?  Perhaps website > building was included? > > Don Not that I can see. The HTML pages are built using stylesheets, and the only place

Re: Building Struts Website

t gets us back into the Maven vs. Ant debate. I'd imagine we don't want to have part of the build require Ant, and the other require Maven. Are there any examples of this being done that use Ant? Don -Ted. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:55:53 -0800, Don Brown wrote: Ok, I give up - how do you

Re: Building Struts Website

gt; > > Well, that gets us back into the Maven vs. Ant debate.  I'd imagine > we don't want to have part of the build require Ant, and the other > require Maven.  Are there any examples of this being done that use > Ant? > > Don > >> >> -Ted. >> &g

Re: Building Struts Website

e: Ok, I give up - how do you build the Struts website? Last I remember, I used ant which pulled the content from /docs but I can't seem to find any site building task in build.xml. Are we now only using maven and /xdocs? Don -

Re: Building Struts Website

site. -Ted. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:55:53 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > Ok, I give up - how do you build the Struts website?  Last I > remember, I used ant which pulled the content from /docs but I > can't seem to find any site building task in build.xml.  Are we now

Re: Building Struts Website

Historically, the Struts website has just been a copy of the struts-documentation.war webapp, uploaded to the server and then unpacked into "/www/struts.apache.org/". The only semi tricky part is you have to make sure the permissions are set correctly (set your umask to 0002 before unpa

Building Struts Website

Ok, I give up - how do you build the Struts website? Last I remember, I used ant which pulled the content from /docs but I can't seem to find any site building task in build.xml. Are we now only using maven and /xdocs?