We must wait with that, till we solve the issue with Ognl
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/6/7 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> +1 for package renaming
> -1 for the lost of the separation between web and non-web st
+1 for package renaming
-1 for the lost of the separation between web and non-web stuff
On 7 June 2011 08:20, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next.
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> Warszawa JUG conf
That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/6/5 Steven Benitez :
> Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it
Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it
as a separate jar for now to accomodate the non-web users. Then if we opt to
merge it in the future it will already have the uniform package structure
and still be semi-partitioned in the xwork sub-package.
On Sun, Jun 5,
I assume you meant "losing" instead of "using"?
-Dale
On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web
> bits. I like that separation.
>
> Dave
-
To unsu
On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>> package structure change drastically?
>
> Yeah, from com.opensymphony.xwork to org.apache.struts, but that's
> inevitable sooner or later ...
That's a name change but if a 1-1 mapping still not really a structural change.
My question is if st
Thank you.
I was curious if anything more than refactoring the package structure would be
involved.
jb
/
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2011/6/5 Dale Newfield :
>> On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart
>> wrote:
>>> one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork
I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web
bits. I like that separation.
Dave
2011/6/5 Dale Newfield :
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart
> wrote:
>> one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core -
>> but we still discussing the best option.
>
> For example, should the package structure change drastically?
Yeah, from com.opensymphony.xwork to org.apache.s
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core -
> but we still discussing the best option.
For example, should the package structure change drastically?
-Dale
-
To unsub
2011/6/2 Jeff Black :
> What all does "merging" entail?
Mainly to have one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core -
but we still discussing the best option.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
What all does "merging" entail?
jb
/
From: Dave Newton
To: Struts Developers List ; lukasz.len...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2011 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;)
Not sure what the best way to d
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
>> [...] relocate the opensymphony dtds in the meanwhile [...]
>
> Relo and announce, sure.
>
> An Atlassian guy shows up in the whois, should we reach out?
To Mike? Sure, why not. Also
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
> [...] relocate the opensymphony dtds in the meanwhile [...]
Relo and announce, sure.
An Atlassian guy shows up in the whois, should we reach out?
Dave
-
To unsubscribe
We should seriously consider to relocate the opensymphony dtds in the
meanwhile. I make you note that the first messages are starting to appear in
the user ml.
WDYT?
--
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 02/giu/2011 01.20, "Dave Newton" ha
scritto:
+1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;)
Not su
+1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;)
Not sure what the best way to do it is, though.
I doubt anybody is tracking our XW core anymore, although at one point
there were people using just XW. And I like the idea of keeping the
core command stuff separate from the web-related stuff.
Dave
On
+1 for merging
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> +1
>
> Johannes
>
> -
>
> --
> web: http://www.jgeppert.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.c
+1
Johannes
-
--
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-error-for-xwork-core-in-trunk-tp4443743p4446228.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
+1
Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message-
> From: John Lindal [mailto:lind...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 14:54
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
>
> +1
>
> John
>
>
> On
+1
John
On 6/1/11 11:50 AM, "Maurizio Cucchiara"
wrote:
> +1 definitely
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
> Il giorno 01/giu/2011 20.47, "Lukasz Lenart"
> ha scritto:
> 2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara :
>
>> As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd
>> is no longer reachable
+1 definitely
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 01/giu/2011 20.47, "Lukasz Lenart"
ha scritto:
2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd
> is no longer reachable.
So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT?
Regards
-
2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd
> is no longer reachable.
So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http:
As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd
is no longer reachable.
On 1 June 2011 07:15, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2011/6/1 John Lindal :
>> I get “Wrong line number:
>> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from
>> com.opensymphony.xwork2
2011/6/1 John Lindal :
> I get “Wrong line number:
> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2()
Are you behind a firewall ? I had got such problem when I had been
trying to
ous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> From: lind...@yahoo-inc.com
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:27:02 -0700
> Subject: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
>
> I get “Wrong line number:
> http://www.opensymphony
I get “Wrong line number:
http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from
com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2()
I’m using Maven 2, but I can’t see how that would affect the unit tests.
Is anybody else getting this uni
26 matches
Mail list logo
