From memory (WW in Action) there seems to be similar concepts in
Cintoo messages that WW/SAF2 has - but I was hoping someone who knows
would comment.
The license is Apache 2 and it looks good to me - is this something
that SAF2 would benefit from or is that area already well covered?
Actually, I take that back -- the sample code on their page uses Java
5. I don't know if the library itself requires it.
Hubert
On 6/30/06, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like it requires Java 5. Has there been a decision to move
SAF2 to Java 5?
Hubert
On 6/30/06, Niall
Some further reflections:
WW and SPR both use ThreadLocal to store the locale of the thread's request.
However, there still needs to be a shared object that can set/retrieve the
local across web frameworks.
So I 100% agree with the ThreadLocal use, but it is not directly relevant to my
No, but there was talk of doing it and using retro-do-dah
(translator/weaver) I think. Can't remember where that discussion
went.
Niall
On 6/30/06, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like it requires Java 5. Has there been a decision to move
SAF2 to Java 5?
Hubert
On 6/30/06,
On 6/30/06, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like it requires Java 5. Has there been a decision to move
SAF2 to Java 5?
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease200
The platform for SAF 2.0.x is Java 1.5, with Java 1.4 compatibity
provided by Retroweaver.
-T.
Ahh, ok. Thanks for clarifying that.
I was not able to follow that discussion to the end.
(Looks like I'm not the only one.)
Hubert
On 6/30/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/06, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like it requires Java 5. Has there been a decision
From memory (WW in Action) there seems to be similar
concepts in
Cintoo messages that WW/SAF2 has - but I was hoping
someone who knows
would comment.
The license is Apache 2 and it looks good to me - is
this something
that SAF2 would benefit from or is that area already
well covered?
At 11:36 AM -0700 6/30/06, Paul Benedict wrote:
Some further reflections:
WW and SPR both use ThreadLocal to store the locale of the thread's
request. However, there still needs to be a shared object that can
set/retrieve the local across web frameworks.
So I 100% agree with the ThreadLocal
At 1:01 PM -0700 6/30/06, Paul Benedict wrote:
Joe,
First, thanks for pointing out cintoo. I looked at the source and it
seems like it could be something s1/2 could share together. Are you
interested in investigating this with me? Is anyone else?
that wasn't me :) I don't have a ton of
