Re: svn commit: r1407279 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: svnadmin/main.c tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py

2012-11-09 Thread Mat Booth
On 8 November 2012 23:07, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:42:34PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Nov 8 21:42:34 2012 New Revision: 1407279 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1407279view=rev Log: Rather than continue

Windows buildbot FAIL on 1.7.x

2012-11-09 Thread Philip Martin
The Windows buildbots are failing on the 1.7.x branch: FAIL: patch_tests.py 37: patch target with no eol at eof @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -U svn-test-work\working_copies\patch_tests-37\A/mu +U svn-test-work\working_copies\patch_tests-37\A\mu U

Re: svn commit: r1407279 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: svnadmin/main.c tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py

2012-11-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Mat Booth wrote on Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:07:25 +: On 8 November 2012 23:07, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:42:34PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Nov 8 21:42:34 2012 New Revision: 1407279 URL:

Re: [RFC] Non-normalizing Unicode Composition Awareness

2012-11-09 Thread Thomas Åkesson
Revisiting this thread after a few months. Last spring, I did some work in the Wiki designing a proposal for resolving the Mac Unicode issues in a Non-normalizing manner. I ran out of time, but the thought process has been ongoing. A couple of weeks ago at Subversion Live in London, I had the

Re: Windows buildbot FAIL on 1.7.x

2012-11-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:07:33AM +, Philip Martin wrote: The Windows buildbots are failing on the 1.7.x branch: FAIL: patch_tests.py 37: patch target with no eol at eof @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -U svn-test-work\working_copies\patch_tests-37\A/mu +U

Re: [RFC] Non-normalizing Unicode Composition Awareness

2012-11-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.11.2012 12:28, Thomas Åkesson wrote: Today, I noticed that Branko started some implementation in a branch. Looks like a collation based on utf8proc is in the making? I think that would make a lot of sense because the ICU extension poses some challenges in the build process and we

Re: Windows buildbot FAIL on 1.7.x

2012-11-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.11.2012 13:29, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:07:33AM +, Philip Martin wrote: The Windows buildbots are failing on the 1.7.x branch: FAIL: patch_tests.py 37: patch target with no eol at eof @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -U

Re: Windows buildbot FAIL on 1.7.x

2012-11-09 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:07:33AM +, Philip Martin wrote: The Windows buildbots are failing on the 1.7.x branch: FAIL: patch_tests.py 37: patch target with no eol at eof @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -U

Re: Windows buildbot FAIL on 1.7.x

2012-11-09 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes: Can I just commit that to the 1.7.x branch as obvious fix? Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/patch_tests.py === ---

Re: svn commit: r1311476 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: fs.h fs_fs.c

2012-11-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:46:34PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Mon Apr 9 21:46:34 2012 New Revision: 1311476 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1311476view=rev Log: Turn hard-coded deltification parameters into config parameters for format 4 and later (they

Re: Windows buildbot FAIL on 1.7.x

2012-11-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:01:48PM +, Philip Martin wrote: Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes: Can I just commit that to the 1.7.x branch as obvious fix? Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/patch_tests.py

Re: Windows buildbot FAIL on 1.7.x

2012-11-09 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes: I'd prefer to just commit this little patch. +1 -- Certified Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download

Re: [RFC] Non-normalizing Unicode Composition Awareness

2012-11-09 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/09/2012 07:49 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 09.11.2012 12:28, Thomas Åkesson wrote: I'm currently doing the grunt work of implementing the collation (done) and the LIKE and GLOB operators that we'll need (in progress). The next, and biggest, step will be to review the client and WC

Re: [RFC] Non-normalizing Unicode Composition Awareness

2012-11-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.11.2012 14:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 11/09/2012 07:49 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 09.11.2012 12:28, Thomas Åkesson wrote: I'm currently doing the grunt work of implementing the collation (done) and the LIKE and GLOB operators that we'll need (in progress). The next, and biggest,

Re: [PATCH]: Encoding fix mailer.py

2012-11-09 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 09/04/2012 12:58 PM, Igor Galić wrote: Hey folks, I've patched up my local mailer.py[1] to correctly encode From: Headers. The attached patch *works* but it's not pretty. Someone who actually knows Python might want to encapsulate my changes in a function. n.b.: I am not

Re: [PATCH]: Encoding fix mailer.py

2012-11-09 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/09/2012 09:31 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 09/04/2012 12:58 PM, Igor Galić wrote: Hey folks, I've patched up my local mailer.py[1] to correctly encode From: Headers. The attached patch *works* but it's not pretty. Someone who actually knows Python might want to encapsulate my

No Apache httpd for Windows?

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Phippard
I know many of you are part of the httpd project, and I am not, so asking here. With the current Apache 2.2.x and 2.4.x there are no more Windows downloads available. Does anyone know why? I do not see anything on the mailing lists, but maybe I am just missing it. I can understand that maybe

Re: Content-Length in HEAD responses

2012-11-09 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/08/2012 11:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Thomas Åkesson wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 15:15:03 +0100: On 5 nov 2012, at 09:11, Branko Čibej wrote: On 05.11.2012 00:21, Thomas Åkesson wrote: I did some tests with curl --head just as a sanity check. It seems to be a good choice for

Re: svn commit: r1407279 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: svnadmin/main.c tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py

2012-11-09 Thread Mat Booth
On 9 November 2012 11:13, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Mat Booth wrote on Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:07:25 +: On 8 November 2012 23:07, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:42:34PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu

Re: Authz on Collection of Repositories

2012-11-09 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Thomas Åkesson thomas.akes...@simonsoft.se wrote: On 5 nov 2012, at 00:21, Thomas Åkesson wrote: Hi Thomas, Thank you for comprehensive testing! See my reply inline. I have meant to set up a test server with our reference configuration to validate the patch

serf buildbot FAIL on trunk@1407545

2012-11-09 Thread Philip Martin
The centos buildbot failed on trunk@1407545. I can't reproduce it. The failing update produces: U svn-test-work/working_copies/special_tests-25/s-type Usvn-test-work/working_copies/special_tests-25/s-in-place Dsvn-test-work/working_copies/special_tests-25/s-replace A

Re: No Apache httpd for Windows?

2012-11-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.11.2012 16:10, Mark Phippard wrote: I know many of you are part of the httpd project, and I am not, so asking here. With the current Apache 2.2.x and 2.4.x there are no more Windows downloads available. Does anyone know why? I do not see anything on the mailing lists, but maybe I am

Re: No Apache httpd for Windows?

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: Producing that Windows zip file, and the build scripts within, and generally maintaining the Windows build env was also a one-man effort. Did they stop posting the Windows zip file because it just is not needed, or is

Re: No Apache httpd for Windows?

2012-11-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.11.2012 19:50, Mark Phippard wrote: That is what I expected. I just figured the project would state this somewhere. The files are still listed as Unix tarballs which makes it sound like it is meant to build on Unix. It's kind of an informal policy here at the ASF that source release

Re: [RFC] Non-normalizing Unicode Composition Awareness

2012-11-09 Thread Thomas Åkesson
On 9 nov 2012, at 14:28, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote: On 11/09/2012 07:49 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 09.11.2012 12:28, Thomas Åkesson wrote: I'm currently doing the grunt work of implementing the collation (done) and the LIKE and GLOB operators that we'll need (in progress).

Re: serf buildbot FAIL on trunk@1407545

2012-11-09 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: The centos buildbot failed on trunk@1407545. I can't reproduce it. The failing update produces: It's happened a second time on trunk@1407583. Between the failures it worked on trunk@1407556. -- Certified Supported Apache Subversion

Re: serf buildbot FAIL on trunk@1407545

2012-11-09 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: The centos buildbot failed on trunk@1407545. I can't reproduce it. The failing update produces: It's happened a second time on trunk@1407583. Between the

Re: serf buildbot FAIL on trunk@1407545

2012-11-09 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: The centos buildbot failed on trunk@1407545. I can't reproduce it. The failing update produces: It's happened a second time on trunk@1407583. Between the

Re: Content-Length in HEAD responses

2012-11-09 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.netwrote: request, so I'm wondering ... does Apache just handle a HEAD as a GET under-the-hood and then discard the resulting response body? The comment Unless the handler does something special, yes, httpd will treat HEAD as

Re: Content-Length in HEAD responses

2012-11-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.11.2012 04:59, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.netwrote: request, so I'm wondering ... does Apache just handle a HEAD as a GET under-the-hood and then discard the resulting response body? The comment Unless the handler does