Hi.
I have this error today - first one I've ever seen with SVN!
I was simply running update on a repo I checked out a while back (less
than 2 months), it's not had too many updates applied to it since then,
so it's not a massively used repo. I'm running the latest TortoiseSVN
(1.8.1) so I
The one thing I can think of that is a "must tell" is the sparse checkout
feature - none of the DVCSs have this, and it's a pretty damn useful part of
the whole.
There's the OSS training from Polarion:
http://www.polarion.com/products/svn/subtrain.php
"SubTrain is licensed under the Creative Co
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Singleton [mailto:a...@assembla.com]
> Sent: 11 July 2011 21:55
> To: Bob Archer
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: It's time to fix Subversion Merge
>
> If you want offline commit and private repositories, you can use git or
> mercurial. We
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Samuelson [mailto:pe...@p12n.org]
> Sent: 30 June 2011 23:58
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional
> backup software?
>
>
> [Hyrum K Wright]
> > I like this idea, but it would seem
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: 29 June 2011 17:39
> To: Julian Foad
> Cc: Philipp Kloke; Hyrum K Wright; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Static code analysis (cppcheck)
>
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> >> [SVN\subversion\libsvn
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 21 June 2011 18:27
> To: Justin Erenkrantz
> Cc: Greg Stein; Daniel Shahaf; dev@subversion.apache.org; OBones; Uwe
> Schuster
> Subject: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along (was on users@: Re:
> 1.7.0-alph
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] On Behalf Of Branko Cibej
> Sent: 24 March 2011 15:32
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Case-only renames on Windows (issue #3702)
>
[snip]
> In short, things aren't /that/ tricky as far as renames go. They're a
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: 25 February 2011 15:33
> To: Noorul Islam K M
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3799 - exporting file should not overwrite
>
> On Sat, 2011-02-19, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> > I think it
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: 28 January 2011 19:03
> To: Bolstridge, Andrew
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Feature] New feature about handling 'HTTP Error 302
> Movedtemporarily'?
>
>
> On 01/27/2011 08:27 PM, Wu Di wrote:
> > I found path in subversion sometimes too long, it's hard to be sent by
> > Email and something else.
> > And 'Tiny URL' is more popular now. it redirect a short URL to a long one.
> >
> > I thing is a good idea if TortoiseSvn could handle 'HTTP Error 30
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 December 2010 22:56
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Windows svnsync test suite failures and a clue
>
[snip]
>
> Being somewhat incredulous that this was the problem, I reinstalled
> WLE2011 and sure
> -Original Message-
> From: Blair Zajac [mailto:bl...@orcaware.com]
> Sent: 09 December 2010 00:45
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: 1.7 performance requirements for release
>
[snip]
>
> Do we need to be faster than 1.6 to do a release? Do we want to say,
all
> operations are
*I thought* he was saying it's not good for a community/tool when people
develop exporters that take dumps from their system and use it to write
importers into competing tools (eg GIT) without providing the reverse.
What he thinks we should be doing is writing *importers* for our tool, to take
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: 09 November 2010 16:42
> To: Hyrum K. Wright
> Cc: Bolstridge, Andrew; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people
> at the Apac
> -Original Message-
> From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf
> Of Hyrum K. Wright
> Sent: 15 November 2010 18:17
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Translation help
>
> To any current and/or interested translators:
>
> In an effort to make translation o
> -Original Message-
> From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf
Of Hyrum K. Wright
> Sent: 07 November 2010 02:34
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people
at the ApacheCon meetup)
[snip]
> My question
-Original Message-
> From: Steinar Bang [mailto:s...@dod.no]
> Sent: 13 October 2010 21:16
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: object-model: Return by value, reference or pointer? (or
something else?)
> Do you need the distrinction between an empty string and a NULL?
> If not
-Original Message-
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra [mailto:artag...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 September 2010 19:58
To: Neels J Hofmeyr
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; Daniel Shahaf; Stefan Sperling
Subject: Re: place of svnrdump
Neels J Hofmeyr writes:
> While we're at it... svnsync's slowness is
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 7:47 PM
> To: Philip Martin
> Cc: dmitry boyarintsev; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Pascal bindings
>
> On 09/02/2010 01:38 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> > dmitry boyar
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:37 AM
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bikeshed: configuration override order
>
> On 11.08.2010 11:05, Bolstridge, Andrew wrote:
> > The s
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:25 PM
> To: C. Michael Pilato
> Cc: Bolstridge, Andrew; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Bikeshed: configuration override order
>
[snip]
>
> Oh?
> Summary...
>
> There are two issues here...
>
> 1. The repo admin wants to enforce what is commited to their repo.
This
> exists with scripts but common request can be made inherient repo
settings
> (probably need to be path based).
>
The issue with pre-commit hooks is that they are run aft
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:08 PM
> To: Hyrum K. Wright
> Cc: Talden; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: 1.7 Release Plan
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:43, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
> > The project doesn't
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:05 AM
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Suggestion: Transparent Branching
>
> On 07.07.2010 18:29, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:44 -0400, Marco Jansen wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 3:34 PM
> To: svnusert...@href.com
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] new feature, lazy sync via export --
> skipfilesmatchingsize
>
[snip]
> I don't know if there is i
> -Original Message-
> From: dave b [mailto:db.pub.m...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:05 PM
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: BUG: when performing a checkout use the cased url as in the
> download URL
>
>
> When performing a checkout use the cased url as in t
> -Original Message-
> From: Marco Jansen [mailto:sart...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 4:44 PM
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Suggestion: Transparent Branching
>
> Greetings,
>
> The issue we have is that we use trunk as a stable version, but with
ongoing
> main
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 5:13 PM
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Problem building Serf on Windows
>
> I am setting up a new Windows build machine. I am building our 1.6.12
> release and deps zip. I get a
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Barrett [mailto:a...@cequrux.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:26 AM
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: auto-upgrade of working copy
>
[snip]
> The auto-upgrade has always bothered me. I'd much prefer to have a
> command line action (e.g. "sv
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:08 PM
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: First SVN performance data
>
> Hi there,
>
> as I promised, I'm going to conduct some in-depth analysis and
> comprehensive
> -Original Message-
> From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf
Of
> Hyrum K. Wright
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:55 PM
> To: Peter Samuelson
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Saving a few cycles, part 2/2
>
...
> I would agree. I saw
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>Sent: Mon 26/04/2010 19:27
>To: Bolstridge, Andrew
>Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Feature idea: user-configurable post-commit notifications
>
>Bolstridge, Andrew wrote on F
On 23.04.2010 00:06, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> With the increased integration of build tools and other notification
> systems which desire knowledge of commit activity, it would be useful
> to provide an easier mechanism of installing post-commit notification,
> without having to use the hook inf
> -Original Message-
> From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf
Of
> Hyrum K. Wright
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:58 PM
> To: Stefan Sperling
> Cc: Philip Martin; Tim Starling; Greg Stein; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Pushmi support
>
> The last thi
> ROADMAP
> With that vision in mind, we identified a number of high-value improvements
> which Subversion should gain in coming releases. Then we took a casual pass
> at assigning some technical "plumbing" dependencies for each of these.
> Here's what we came up with, in the form "FEATURE: [DEP
> -Original Message-
> From: Vadim Chekan [mailto:kot.bege...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:14 AM
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal
>
> P.S. Plase, introduce true tags, no more "lets pretend this copy
is
> a tag".
I agree
36 matches
Mail list logo
