On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Well, (most) religion(s) has done nothing but provided a 'justifiable' reason
> for
> genocide. I don't know what propaganda/FUD you subscribe too, so I can't say
> anything about *your* religion.
I guess we know what propaganda/FUD *you* subscr
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:04:07AM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:33:19PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> >> ruled by a religion
> > I thought you were a 'utopian philosopher'? Everyone knows that in a utopia
> > there would be no religi
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:26:05 -0700, frederic wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:51:46 +0200, Uriel wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
A few months ago lobobrowser.org caught my eye. Its a browser written in
>
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:26:05 -0700, frederic wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:51:46 +0200, Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
A few months ago lobobrowser.org caught my eye. Its a browser written in
java (hold on... don't kick me off the list... :) ) but the thing I
I have always used troff to generate really nice 4:3 landscape slides,
but that is on Plan 9, I should put my macros and some examples in
http://repo.cat-v.org but it really is not rocket science.
uriel
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:53 PM, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-09-07 01:27] Uriel
>>
>> Troff
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:34 PM, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-09-07 22:05] Paul Malherbe
>>
>>
>> --snip---
>
> Your mail gets most likely redirected to /dev/null before he reads it.
Indeed, what the fuck is up with retards using HTML email?
uriel
>
>
> meillo
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:35 PM, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-09-07 11:50] Uriel
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Uriel wrote:
>> >> You can't have a "sane web browser"[1] with an insane rendering
>> >> engine. All you are doing otherwise i
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:33:19PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>> ruled by a religion
> I thought you were a 'utopian philosopher'? Everyone knows that in a utopia
> there would be no religion.
No religion? What is wrong with *my* religion?
> Everything
[2009-09-07 22:05] Paul Malherbe
>
>
> --snip---
Your mail gets most likely redirected to /dev/null before he reads it.
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bye Bye
Regards
Paul
Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
2009/9/7 frederic :
So, the only way is to get rid of the whole "Web" stack and to rewrite a
"sane" one. This would mean:
Following Uriel's logic the
> Again, uzbl and surf developers are *not* 'browser programmers', they
> are not writing any browsers, they are painting a very thin coat of
> paint over existing turd browsers out there.
why give up history autocompletion and go back to the dark ages of .ini file
editing ?
its the same turd in
[2009-09-07 21:47] Dieter Plaetinck
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:35:50 +0200
> markus schnalke wrote:
> >
> > Read my slides, I clearly state this: Take the broken render engine as
> > black box and add sane interfaces around.
> >
> (..)
> >
> > It's the web browser that complies better with the Un
[2009-09-07 01:27] Uriel
>
> Troff works great for generating slides.
How?
For me, (computer presentation) slides are pages in 4:3 landscape
format.
Unfortunately, I've not managed yet to generate such documents.
`.pl 5i' lets the formated text only go half the page down, but the
resulting PS
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:35:50 +0200
markus schnalke wrote:
>
> Read my slides, I clearly state this: Take the broken render engine as
> black box and add sane interfaces around.
>
(..)
>
> It's the web browser that complies better with the Unix Philosophy
> than any other I've seen. Only the re
[2009-09-07 11:50] Uriel
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Uriel wrote:
> >> You can't have a "sane web browser"[1] with an insane rendering
> >> engine. All you are doing otherwise is giving a turd another coat of
> >> paint.
> >> [1]: Of cou
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:33:19PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>> ruled by a religion
> I thought you were a 'utopian philosopher'? Everyone knows that in a utopia
> there would be no religion. Everything would be solved rationally.
On Planet9 from Bell
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:33:19PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> ruled by a religion
I thought you were a 'utopian philosopher'? Everyone knows that in a utopia
there would be no religion. Everything would be solved rationally.
> uriel
>
--
Jake Todd
// If it isn't broke, tweak it!
pgpMMPuKjt9fQ.pgp
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/9/7 frederic :
>> So, the only way is to get rid of the whole "Web" stack and to rewrite a
>> "sane" one. This would mean:
>
> Following Uriel's logic the only way to get rid of the "Web" stack is
> wether suicide or going to the forest
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:07:47 +0300
> Niklas Koponen wrote:
>
>> My plan is to take a snaphot of the root window at certain intervals
>> if there has been some mouse or keyboard activity. I also record the
>> amount of activity. Then I store t
2009/9/7 frederic :
> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:51:46 +0200, Uriel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
>>>
>>> A few months ago lobobrowser.org caught my eye. Its a browser written in
>>> java (hold on... don't kick me off the list... :) ) but the thing I liked
>>> about it w
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:51:46 +0200, Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
A few months ago lobobrowser.org caught my eye. Its a browser written in
java (hold on... don't kick me off the list... :) ) but the thing I
liked
about it was its support for alternative docum
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
> A few months ago lobobrowser.org caught my eye. Its a browser written in
> java (hold on... don't kick me off the list... :) ) but the thing I liked
> about it was its support for alternative document formats. It supports
> JavaFX out of the box an
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Uriel wrote:
>> You can't have a "sane web browser"[1] with an insane rendering
>> engine. All you are doing otherwise is giving a turd another coat of
>> paint.
>>
>> At the moment my only hope for a minimally sane
Wrong, sane unix-like bindings are not "Emacs". The gnome people are
ignorant retards and never learn, I told them this years ago.
uriel
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Ramil Farkhshatov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:53:14AM -0700, Ryan Zheng wrote:
>> I've been meaning to send this one for
diff -r 740f25ee1c92 surf.c
--- a/surf.cMon Sep 07 11:02:26 2009 +0200
+++ b/surf.cMon Sep 07 11:15:10 2009 +0200
@@ -661,8 +661,6 @@
/* make dirs */
home = g_get_home_dir();
- filename = g_build_filename(home, ".surf", NULL);
- g_mkdir_with_parents(filename,
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:53:14AM -0700, Ryan Zheng wrote:
> I've been meaning to send this one for a while now. It adds some
> bindings to the urlbar and searchbar (c-h, c-w, c-u for deleting, c-b,
> c-e for home/end). Not sure how it should be changed now that there's
> a config.h
It can be aco
26 matches
Mail list logo
