Why do you need to know more C than you to do this? I already do this
in shellscript..
If the site doesnt works is webkit fault in most of cases. Do keeping
a list of urls Will be useful for something?
On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:59 PM, jokke wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:29:29 +0200, Dieter Pl
> What Works list would be nice ... and better if someone who knows C better
> than me could write a patch to surf so when site (hopefully not every forum
> of hobbies) works, you could just hit hotkey and it submits url (FE
> http://underdomain.this-site-doesnt-suck.much/ not whole url ofcourse) t
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:29:29 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck
wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400
> Jacob Todd wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
>> > Do we really need that "What Works" list on
>> > http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites works w
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:29:29PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400
> Jacob Todd wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
> > > Do we really need that "What Works" list on
> > > http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400
Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
> > Do we really need that "What Works" list on
> > http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites works with
> > WebKit?
> >
> Some sites do silly things with cookies, and th
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
> Do we really need that "What Works" list on http://surf.suckless.org/?
> It tells reader what sites works with WebKit?
>
Some sites do silly things with cookies, and they don't work, or don't work
too well with surf. I think it's somewha
Do we really need that "What Works" list on http://surf.suckless.org/?
It tells reader what sites works with WebKit?
