I would think that setting a terminal title would be a trivial task
using xdotool, xprop and dmenu, which would help if you don't
pre-launch apps on startup and keep them running on a specified
tag (which is how I work around this issue). I might work on this
script this evening when I get off of
On 07/07/11 15:29, Rob wrote:
On 7 July 2011 14:18, Ruben Gonzalez Arnau wrote:
Talking about remember applications when restarting, it's possible to
remember "terminals" too? When I restart dwm everything is okey with my
config.h rules and each app goes to its tag, except all xterms go to tag
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:18:21PM +0200, Ruben Gonzalez Arnau wrote:
> Talking about remember applications when restarting, it's possible
> to remember "terminals" too? When I restart dwm everything is okey
> with my config.h rules and each app goes to its tag, except all
> xterms go to tag 1, I t
On 7 July 2011 14:18, Ruben Gonzalez Arnau wrote:
> Talking about remember applications when restarting, it's possible to
> remember "terminals" too? When I restart dwm everything is okey with my
> config.h rules and each app goes to its tag, except all xterms go to tag 1,
> I think that is the no
On 07/07/11 13:48, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Thomas Dean<78...@web.de> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:37:15 +0200, julien steinhauser wrote:
I like the idea of having only used tags visible. One problem with this
patch though is that dwm loses all tags when res
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 13:48:27 +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> I don't think vanilla dwm remembers tags when restarting so it's not
> that the patch removes that behaviour. You can specify rules in your
> config.h which tags to apply to each application.
You are right, I was remembering it incor
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Thomas Dean <78...@web.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:37:15 +0200, julien steinhauser wrote:
>
> I like the idea of having only used tags visible. One problem with this
> patch though is that dwm loses all tags when restarting. Before, the
> tagging survive
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:37:15 +0200, julien steinhauser wrote:
> Code from Hiltjo Posthuma and Jeremiah Dow ( with minor add ) is merged in
> this patch.
> The behaviour is :
>
> - border is shown when one sees more than one client.
> - tags are shown when they are viewed or when clients are l
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 03:19:12PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if you intended it
> as an upstream patch, but most people probably won't like it in
> upstream dwm.
I know there are some people using dwm around here,
it was intended for who could find a use case to it.
> Note
On 4 July 2011 16:23, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> I would rather dwm only displayed the visible tags
... And those in use, ofc.
cls
On 4 July 2011 14:19, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Note that drawsquare() is not only used for showing if a
> tag is used by clients but also to indicate floating clients in the
> titlebar so your patch removes that also.
The patch also makes it impossible to see which tags the focused
client is tagg
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:37 AM, julien steinhauser
wrote:
> Code from Hiltjo Posthuma and Jeremiah Dow ( with minor add ) is merged in
> this patch.
> The behaviour is :
>
> - border is shown when one sees more than one client.
> - tags are shown when they are viewed or when clients are labelled
Code from Hiltjo Posthuma and Jeremiah Dow ( with minor add ) is merged in this
patch.
The behaviour is :
- border is shown when one sees more than one client.
- tags are shown when they are viewed or when clients are labelled with them.
drawsquare is removed.
As i don't know C, please say anyt
13 matches
Mail list logo
