Hi,
With Dimitris' recent vi(m) bindings came a bug.
BUG: operations added via multiplication appear as a set of unchained
single Undo(s). They should be chained so they are undone / redone
together.
Which made me realize:
TODO: need to extend the repeat framework (i.e. the '.' command) to
On July 15, 2014 11:20:44 AM EEST, Rafa Garcia Gallego
rafael.garcia.gall...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
With Dimitris' recent vi(m) bindings came a bug.
BUG: operations added via multiplication appear as a set of unchained
single Undo(s). They should be chained so they are undone / redone
together.
Hey,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Rafa Garcia Gallego
rafael.garcia.gall...@gmail.com wrote:
TODO: need to extend the repeat framework (i.e. the '.' command) to
store operations, multiplication and their parameters.
This reminds me of the record option in vim with
qkeytypeStuffsAndEditq
Carlos Torres wrote:
i never got the . command to do much other than repeat the latest insert or
delete...(probably me).
Heyho,
I find it quite handy as an easy way of interactive search and replace. Instead
of „:%s/bla/blub/gc“ I can just „*“ on the word, „cw“ or „s5“ once and then hit
„n“
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:10:57PM +0200, Markus Teich wrote:
Carlos Torres wrote:
i never got the . command to do much other than repeat the latest insert
or
delete...(probably me).
Heyho,
I find it quite handy as an easy way of interactive search and replace.
Instead
of
Rafa Garcia Gallego wrote:
One thing I like from sandy is that it sets the selection when finding
(instead of highlighting the term in another silly way). Maybe we can keep
this in sandy-vi, so that:
/fooRETcbarESC
Works as you expect, despite not being 100% vi(m) compatible.
Heyho,
