[VOTE][SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic

Hi, Having launched a formal discussion thread for [SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic a few weeks ago [1], and having not received any major feedback, I thought it would be prudent to now put the SIP to a vote. As a reminder t

Re: [VOTE][SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic

+1 approve On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:44 PM John Bodley wrote: > Hi, > > Having launched a formal discussion thread for [SIP-99] Proposal for > correctly handling business logic > a few weeks ago [1], and > having not received any major feedback,

Re: [VOTE][SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic

+1 (binding) > On Nov 28, 2023, at 6:23 PM, Craig Rueda wrote: > > +1 approve > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:44 PM John Bodley > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Having launched a formal discussion thread for [SIP-99] Proposal for >> correctly handling business logic >>

Re: [VOTE][SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic

+1 (binding) > On Nov 28, 2023, at 12:09 PM, John Bodley > wrote: > > Hi, > > Having launched a formal discussion thread for [SIP-99] Proposal for > correctly handling business logic > a few weeks ago [1], and > having not received any major fe

Re: [VOTE][SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic

+1 binding > On Nov 28, 2023, at 2:50 PM, Ville Brofeldt > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > >> On Nov 28, 2023, at 12:09 PM, John Bodley >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Having launched a formal discussion thread for [SIP-99] Proposal for >> correctly handling business logic >>

[RESULT][VOTE][SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic

Hi, Thanks to everyone who voted. The vote for [SIP-99] Proposal for correctly handling business logic is now closed. The proposal has PASSED with four binding +1, and zero -1 votes: Binding +1 votes: - Craig - Elizabeth - Michael - Ville There