09:32
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: Persistence Layer in Syncope, Table Creation, orm.xml, content.xml
On 24/02/2014 21:13, Oliver Wulff wrote:
Hi Francesco
I guess that one could rewrite ContentLoader, ContentUpgrader and
ContentExporter to work with EntityManager and thus remove
From: Oliver Wulff [owu...@talend.com]
Sent: 05 January 2014 14:44
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: RE: Persistence Layer in Syncope, Table Creation, orm.xml, content.xml
OpenJPA is initialized via Spring in persistenceContextEMFactory.xml: as
you can read from
Oliver Wulff created SYNCOPE-479:
Summary: Use X-Application-Error-Code Response header instead of
ExceptionType
Key: SYNCOPE-479
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-479
Project
into the
tables which will also create tables implicitly.
Will try to write a JPA based ContentLoader to fill the data.
Thanks
Oli
--
Oliver Wulff
Blog: http://owulff.blogspot.com
Solution Architect
http://coders.talend.com
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Hi there
I'm looking into adding a persistence layer to the Apache Fediz Identity
Provider and used the persistence layer in Syncope as a good reference.
Nevertheless, I got a few questions...
1) JPA creates the tables when the first entity is added - usually triggered by
a REST call.
/2013 14:54, Oliver Wulff wrote:
Hi there
JIRA raised and patch applied:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-460
WRT the BasicDataSource properties... what do you think about adding only
connectionProperties which could be a file with the BasicDataSource
properties.
Patch looks
Oliver Wulff created SYNCOPE-460:
Summary: Default datasource uses BasicDataSource
Key: SYNCOPE-460
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-460
Project: Syncope
Issue Type
Hi there
JIRA raised and patch applied:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-460
WRT the BasicDataSource properties... what do you think about adding only
connectionProperties which could be a file with the BasicDataSource properties.
Oli
--
Oliver Wulff
Blog: http
Hi there
Wouldn't it make sense to use a BasicDataSource instead of
DriverManagerDataSource as it is also recommended from Spring:
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/jdbc.html#jdbc-connections
Instead of this:
bean id=localDataSource
Hi there
Is there a plan to release 1.1.5 soon?
Thanks
Oli
Some thoughts to Approach this. First we have to decide on the security
abstraction layer in syncope like:
1) Wicket (as implemented now)
2) Spring Security
3) Shiro
This decision is independent of what kind of security protocol is chosen like
WS-Federation, SAML, CAS (proprietary protocol) or
I assume there are no dependencies within the code which would allow the users
to still give the option to use logback?
log4j 2 is still in beta. Do we know when it should be released?
Just my two cents...
Thanks
Oli
From: cschneider...@gmail.com
+1 (non-binding)
From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [cohei...@apache.org]
Sent: 02 May 2013 10:35
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.1.1
+1.
Colm.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Massimiliano Perrone
13 matches
Mail list logo