+1 from me as well. I think I can also support Jan with removing Spring MVC in
two-three weeks.
Regards,
Andrei.
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
> Sent: Montag, 29. April 2013 15:20
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Work start on 1.2
Yep that makes sense to me as well.
Colm.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 30/04/2013 09:59, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
>> +1 makes sense to me. How long should we continue to support the 1.0.x
>> branch?
>>
>
> Nice question: I was thinking to a sort of "n
On 30/04/2013 09:59, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
+1 makes sense to me. How long should we continue to support the 1.0.x branch?
Nice question: I was thinking to a sort of "natural end", e.g. fixing
only critical bugs that might be reported (hence nothing ATM for 1.0.9
as reported by JIRA [3]).
+1 makes sense to me. How long should we continue to support the 1.0.x
branch?
Colm.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> Hi all,
> it is already some time since the source trunk is set to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT,
> hence anyone is already able to start working on 1.2.0 issu
On 29/04/2013 17:00, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Montag, 29. April 2013 15:20
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Work start on 1.2.0?
Hi all,
it is already some time since the source trunk is set to 1.2.0-
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
> Sent: Montag, 29. April 2013 15:20
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Work start on 1.2.0?
>
> Hi all,
> it is already some time since the source trunk is set to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT,
> hence anyone is a
