it's a good improvement.
>
> Regards,
> Denis
>
>> -Messaggio originale-
>> Da: ernst Developer [mailto:ernst.develo...@gmail.com]
>> Inviato: lunedì 17 dicembre 2012 13:31
>> A: dev@syncope.apache.org
>> Oggetto: Re: Schema Mapping impro
13:31
> A: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Oggetto: Re: Schema Mapping improvement
>
>
> Yes, I agree.
>
>
> 2012/12/17 Fabio Martelli
>
> >
> > Il giorno 15/dic/2012, alle ore 13.16, ernst Developer ha scritto:
> >
> > > Hi Fabio,
> > >
> > >
; >> creating a specialization between sync and provisioned resources?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>> -Messaggio originale-
> >>> Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com]
> >>> Inviato: venerd
>> Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com]
>>> Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:55
>>> A: dev@syncope.apache.org
>>> Oggetto: Schema Mapping improvement
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> since I see a strong limitat
ggio originale-
>> Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com]
>> Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:55
>> A: dev@syncope.apache.org
>> Oggetto: Schema Mapping improvement
>>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>> since I see a strong limitation about the sc
n't be
> creating a specialization between sync and provisioned resources?
>
> Regards,
> Denis
>
> > -Messaggio originale-
> > Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com]
> > Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:55
> > A: dev@syncope.
che.org
> Oggetto: Schema Mapping improvement
>
>
> Hi guys,
> since I see a strong limitation about the schema mapping
> configuration I'd like to discuss with you about an improvement.
>
> From my PPOV Syncope should give the possibility to specify
> two diffe
Hi guys,
since I see a strong limitation about the schema mapping configuration I'd like
to discuss with you about an improvement.
From my PPOV Syncope should give the possibility to specify two different
mappings for synchronization and propagation.
My suggestion is to provide two boolean flag
