Hi Deron,
Thanks for publishing the updates, and the site looks great! One thing I
noticed is that the "Subscribe to Our Mailing Lists" section does not
reflect what the design team originally had. I'm not sure if you were aware
of this discrepancy.
[image: Inline image 1]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 a
I love the new look & feel of the website and tutorials! (even though there is
no Scala in the animation anymore :( )
I explored the website a little bit further and noticed that the docs haven't
benefittet from the awesome redesign (yet). Is this planned to change?
Also, I want to bring up ver
Hi Luciano,
Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead
and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi L
+1 Rose!
Thanks for putting all these together. You can really see a brand coming
together when you see it all at once. Nice work everyone!
...
Jeremy Anderson
https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
On 25 October 2016 at 15:39, Ren
Hi Luciano,
Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Initial page:
> > - What's the intention of the section just abov
+1. Great idea!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Renee Mascarinas
wrote:
> +1 This is a great idea! It would be nice to invite the community to write
> about their experiences with SystemML as well. Maybe we can start with
> Medium and in the future, do a youtube vlog :]
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 20
+1 This is a great idea! It would be nice to invite the community to write
about their experiences with SystemML as well. Maybe we can start with
Medium and in the future, do a youtube vlog :]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:34 PM, wrote:
> +1 This sounds like a great idea! It would be nice to inclu
+1 Awesome idea! A Medium blog of SystemML stories and updates would really
make the community feel alive. We can even give these blog posts compelling
illustrations featuring DML-bot. :]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:34 PM, wrote:
> +1 This sounds like a great idea! It would be nice to include blog
Thank you for your votes and feedback everyone!
Going with the idea of using both designs as a family of logos, we will be
using the minimalistic design as the SystemML logo for headers and smaller
use cases, and the isometric design as the mascot for illustrations, etc
(naming it DML-bot for now)
+1 Rose!
Thank you so much for the logo assets! The poster looks amazing as well!
Yay!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Rose Peng wrote:
> Thank you for your votes and feedback everyone!
>
> Going with the idea of using both designs as a family of logos, we will be
> using the minimalistic des
+1 This sounds like a great idea! It would be nice to include blogs with
tutorials, fun quick tips and tricks, full case studies, example use cases,
etc.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 1:
+1 for using both.
Cheers,
Glenn
From: Deron Eriksson
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/25/2016 02:24 PM
Subject:Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
+1 sounds great to me too.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, wrote:
> +1 that sounds great to me.
>
> --
>
>
+1 sounds great to me too.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, wrote:
> +1 that sounds great to me.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers
> wrote:
> >
>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Madison Myers
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just a thought on expanding visibility of SystemML: I know lots of us have
> written some blogs and articles on SystemML and I think it would be great
> to get these all in the same spot (and also write more)! I've started
+1 that sounds great to me.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers wrote:
>
> I agree!
> +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for headers
> and #4
Hi Luciano,
Initial page:
> - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it
> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner, and I
> have changed the one in community to what
I agree!
+1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for headers
and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's great
> that we're all on the same
Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
concepts.
Sounds great!
Am 25.10.2016 19:36 schrieb Jason Azares:
Hey guys,
Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's
great
tha
Hey guys,
Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's great
that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and cons of
each logo, here is a quick list:
Logo 1:
- More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
hard to discer
Hey everyone,
Just a thought on expanding visibility of SystemML: I know lots of us have
written some blogs and articles on SystemML and I think it would be great
to get these all in the same spot (and also write more)! I've started a
SystemML Medium blog for this and would love to:
1. republish
All of them are amazing ... I too will go with Deron and my +1 to #1 given
its minimalistic design .
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Acs S wrote:
> I like #4 as well.
> +1 on #4.
>
> -Arvind
>
> From: Berthold Reinwald
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent:
Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. Design team,
could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for each, and perhaps
any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various project materials?
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn:
I like #4 as well.
+1 on #4.
-Arvind
From: Berthold Reinwald
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
+1 on #4.
Regards,
Berthold Reinwald
IBM Almaden Research Center
office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457
23 matches
Mail list logo
