David Taylor: +1 (non binding)
emailsig On 4/10/2024 12:55 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Hello, Tapestry community!
I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.8.6, ready to be voted
upon.
The source, binary, and documentation archives have been uploaded to:
Hello all,
I am glad to hear there is interest in moving forward on the migration.
A gradle plugin is not a bad idea and would be relatively
straightforward to implement. We have developed many gradle plugins over
the years and are open to contributing to that effort.
The simplest approach m
Hi everyone,
We have a similar requirement since we are looking to make the jump to
Spring Boot 3.0 and Hibernate 6.1 which require Jakarta EE 9 and Java
17. Thanks to everyone's hard work, we have a very solid release that
made it easy to move to Java 17. The transition to Jakarta EE is looki
.
IIRC Kalle Korhonen has an active client using these libraries. Perhaps
he would be willing to provide official updates.
Best Regards,
David
On 12/13/2020 4:36 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 2:20 AM David Taylor
wrote:
Hi Thiago,
Hello, David!
We ran
Hi Thiago,
We ran into the same issue with our testing. Not unexpected, but we have
had to rebuild our internal libraries and third-party tapestry libraries
as well. Fortunately, we have patched versions of most of the
third-party libraries and build them internally.
Best Regards,
David
emai
Hi Ben,
A nice addition. We use LocalDateTime and ZonedDateTime in many of our
applications and will make good use of your new type coercers.
Best regards
David
emailsig
On 10/16/2020 4:01 AM, Ben Weidig wrote:
Hi,
it would be great to see the Java Time API better integrated into Tapestry,
s
The proposal looks great and addresses all of our concerns and needs.
The changes to exception handling would be very welcome since the
current approach is problematic when implementing robust error handling
while decoding JSON data.
Best Regards,
David
emailsig
On 7/26/2020 4:40 AM, Ben Weid
: baseFolder + "/" + morePath;
}
emailsig
On 7/23/2020 11:39 PM, David Taylor wrote:
Hello Everyone,
We are very interested in seeing the 5.6.0 update out the door and
decided to test out the patch for TAP5-2632. In the course of doing so
we found another related issue.
Whe
Hi Ben,
Improvements would be quite welcome. We use the Tapestry JSON classes in
many places. One issue we have is that they are rather unfriendly when
it comes to parsing input received from the browser. The Tapestry class
are very much a happy path design and do not provide a means to test
der + "/" + morePath;
}
emailsig
On 7/23/2020 11:39 PM, David Taylor wrote:
Hello Everyone,
We are very interested in seeing the 5.6.0 update out the door and
decided to test out the patch for TAP5-2632. In the course of doing so
we found another related issue.
When the path /ass
devise. That was
actually the first test string entered when testing the patch. Clearly
Tapestry should not be responding to bad input with an exception.
int slashx = extraPath.indexOf('/');
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
begin 0, end -1, length 8
Best Regards,
David Ta
It seems there is a minor problem with the changes that were made to
configure bootstrap in Tapestry 5.5. The addCoreStylesheets method in
JavaScriptModule is being called multiple times which has the untended
side effect of attempting to load the Tapestry core style sheets
multiple times. Some
David Taylor: +1 (non-binding)
Original message
From: "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo"
Date: 3/11/20 9:09 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Tapestry development
Subject: [VOTE] 5.5.0 release
_
>From : Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo [thiag...@gmail.com]
To : Tapestr
Hi,
Just following up to see where we are at with the 5.5.0 release. We are
working on migrating our code to Java 11 and need an official release
before we can move to production.
Are there any open issues holding up the release? I see there was a
build failure with tapestry-javadoc due to a
Same here. Everything looks good from our perspective.
Regards,
David
Original message
From: Bob Harner
Date: 2/1/20 4:18 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Tapestry development
Subject: Re: 5.5.0 release. Let's do it?
_
>From : Bob Harner [bobhar...@gmail.com]
To : Tapestry d
.
Thanks,
David
emailsig eXtensia Technologies, Inc. <http://www.extensiatech.com>
*David Taylor*
Direct Line: 703-398-1264
Mobile: 571-278-1869
david.tay...@extensiatech.com <mailto:david.tay...@extensiatech.com>
This message contains information that is confidential and pr
Is there any interest in providing support for running Tapestry in
Spring Boot?
We have been running Tapestry on Tomcat and Jetty for years and recently
decided to give Spring Boot a try. I initially looked at the
tapestry-boot project on github, but decided to create our own
implementation b
Any additional thoughts regarding alternatives to the AddScript method
for JavaScriptSupport? Should I open a new bug report to capture this
issue and/or request removal of the AddScript deprecation?
--
David Taylor
http://www.extensiatech.com
On 9/26/2015 10:49 PM, David Taylor wrote
tatic configuration approach.
Barring any additional approaches, it seems the addScript() method is
currently the most workable option. Does anyone know why this method was
marked as deprecated? Any chance it could be removed from the
deprecation list?
--
David Taylor
http://www.extensiatec
appreciated.
--
David Taylor
http://www.extensiatech.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
