Re: [DISCUSS]: Source release artifact

2015-10-06 Thread Roger Meier
ev@thrift.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS]: Source release artifact In an effort to make releases easier to cut I would like to propose that we move to using git archive with a .gitignore to exclude any files that we feel should not be apart of the release. This will help cut down on time spent trac

Re: [DISCUSS]: Source release artifact

2015-10-05 Thread Jens Geyer
ing sense), but that's what I imagine. Have fun, JensG -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Jake Farrell Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 7:24 PM To: dev@thrift.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS]: Source release artifact In an effort to make releases easier to cut I would like to propose that

[DISCUSS]: Source release artifact

2015-10-02 Thread Jake Farrell
In an effort to make releases easier to cut I would like to propose that we move to using git archive with a .gitignore to exclude any files that we feel should not be apart of the release. This will help cut down on time spent tracking missed files in the EXTRA_DIST section and having to compare t