Re: source doc to website

2014-03-07 Thread Nevo Hed
chricht- From: Jake Farrell > Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 1:15 AM > > To: Roger Meier > Cc: jfarr...@apache.org ; dev@thrift.apache.org > Subject: Re: source doc to website > > Hey Roger > Excellent discussion thread to start, this is one key area we have > strug

Re: source doc to website

2014-03-06 Thread Jens Geyer
: Jake Farrell Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 1:15 AM To: Roger Meier Cc: jfarr...@apache.org ; dev@thrift.apache.org Subject: Re: source doc to website Hey Roger Excellent discussion thread to start, this is one key area we have struggled with for awhile. Thoughts on moving them all into /docs and

RE: source doc to website

2014-03-06 Thread Roger Meier
: jfarr...@apache.org; dev@thrift.apache.org Subject: Re: source doc to website Hey Roger Excellent discussion thread to start, this is one key area we have struggled with for awhile. Thoughts on moving them all into /docs and naming them appropriately? I think this would be a better appro

Re: source doc to website

2014-03-05 Thread Randy Abernethy
Hey Jake, I think consolidating the tutorial and cross language tests would be great. Would eliminate a lot of redundancy. Makes the tutorial world a little more complex but gives us one place to point to for example code and the examples would be more robust. -Randy On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:15

Re: source doc to website

2014-03-05 Thread Jake Farrell
Hey Roger Excellent discussion thread to start, this is one key area we have struggled with for awhile. Thoughts on moving them all into /docs and naming them appropriately? I think this would be a better approach and make it easier to link and cross reference between the docs and would make it ea

Re: source doc to website

2014-03-05 Thread Randy Abernethy
I like the idea of README.md throughout. Would be nice to have a minimum requirement (as a target) for the content of the lib//READEME.md. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Roger Meier wrote: > Hi Jake & co > > Do you have any trick to integrate some readme's located within the source > tree? > >