See https://builds.apache.org/job/Tika-trunk/901/
--
[...truncated 481 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.3.2:testCompile (default-testCompile) @
tika-parsers ---
[INFO] Compiling 75 source files to
downloaded sources, compiled, tests passed, tested on several files,
works ok. OS: Debian Testing, JVM Sun 1.7.0.05
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
A candidate for the Tika 1.2 release is available at:
looks ok for me, +1
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
downloaded sources, compiled, tests passed, tested on several files,
works ok. OS: Debian Testing, JVM Sun 1.7.0.05
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
Hi,
I'm trying to build Apache Tika from the source, but when I run
mvn -e clean install
on the base directory, I get the following compile error message
error: error reading
/home/park/.m2/repository/org/apache/poi/poi/3.8-beta5/poi-3.8-beta5.jar;
error in opening zip file
[INFO]
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, 122jxgcn wrote:
I'm trying to build Apache Tika from the source, but when I run
mvn -e clean install
on the base directory, I get the following compile error message
error: error reading
/home/park/.m2/repository/org/apache/poi/poi/3.8-beta5/poi-3.8-beta5.jar;
error in
+1
I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked
good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed.
Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory?
Also, we used to name it apache-tika-1.1.src.* but now we dropped the
apache- prefix? Is that intentional? (tika-app jar
All tests succeeded on :
Linux Fedora 17
OSX 10.7.4
+1
Regards,
Zabrane
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
+1
I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked
good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed.
Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC
All tests succeeded on :
Linux Fedora 17
OSX 10.7.4
+1
Regards,
Zabrane
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
+1
I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked
good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed.
Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC
Thanks Mike!
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
+1
I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked
good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed.
Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory?
Good question: this is the first time I've seen
+1
---
Jörg Ehrlich | Computer Scientist | XMP Technology | Adobe Systems |
joerg.ehrl...@adobe.com | work: +49(40)306360
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Dienstag, 10. Juli 2012 22:30
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Cc:
Hi Chris,
On 10 July 2012 21:29, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 8146c1161d35e6b1dc670d078a773f96c37eef8c.
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.2.
The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours and passes if
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.2.
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.2
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory?
Good question: this is the first time I've seen them in there too.
I think
Hi,
here is my +1.
Kind regards,
Oleg
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Why are there
14 matches
Mail list logo
