OK, Thanks Chris.
I committed, and also re-enabled those two @Overrides to make sure it
"really" worked :)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Mike, you could have fooled me!
>
> +1 to commit it, we're good. I think
Mike, you could have fooled me!
+1 to commit it, we're good. I think there haven't been any objections and
the discussion has sort of died down.
Let's commit it!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/12/13 3:15 AM, "Michael McCandless" wrote:
>Seems like this passes?
>
>Is this just a matter of changing tika-p
Seems like this passes?
Is this just a matter of changing tika-parent/pom.xml from:
1.5
1.5
${project.build.sourceEncoding}
to:
1.6
1.6
${project.build.sourceEncoding}
?
I have precious little Maven experience...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandle
+1 from me.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8 Feb 2013, at 17:49, Michael McCandless wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Oleg Tikhonov wrote:
>> Back to the "future". Aha moment !!!
>> Here is mine +1.
>>
>> According to Oracle "In
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Oleg Tikhonov wrote:
> Back to the "future". Aha moment !!!
> Here is mine +1.
>
> According to Oracle "In February 2011 Oracle announced the End of Public
> Updates for their Java SE 6 products for July 2012.
Back to the "future". Aha moment !!!
Here is mine +1.
According to Oracle "In February 2011 Oracle announced the End of Public
Updates for their Java SE 6 products for July 2012. In February 2012 Oracle
extended the End of Public Updates for 4 months, to November 2012. ".
Oleg
On Fri, Feb 8, 2
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> I'm +1 for it. Seems like so is Mike, and also Ken K. Any objections from
> others to require Java6?
+1 to drop Java 5. If anyone is still in production with Java 5, it's
high time to start planning for the upgrade.
BR,
Jukk
Hey Guys,
Just to summarize, the question on the table is whether or not Tika should
require Java6. We had some discussions on this previously (if I get time,
will dig up the threads -- ok found time ;) ):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-888
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ti
