Hi Nick,
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Joerg Ehrlich wrote:
>> Thanks, this looks like a great step forward. It definitely helps to
>> clean up the current metadata usage. But I still have no real idea how
>> to represent structured properties with the current Property/Metadata
>> setup going forward.
>
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Joerg Ehrlich wrote:
Thanks, this looks like a great step forward. It definitely helps to
clean up the current metadata usage. But I still have no real idea how
to represent structured properties with the current Property/Metadata
setup going forward.
The only thing the c
]
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2012 04:58
To:
Subject: Re: A plan to improve the metadata property definitions
On Thu, 17 May 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Thanks Nick, +1.
>
> I'll try and follow and see if I can help in places.
We've tried to keep all the issues a
On Thu, 17 May 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Thanks Nick, +1.
I'll try and follow and see if I can help in places.
We've tried to keep all the issues and commits nice and small, so they're
easy to review, but we did end up on an epic 10 hour coding spree today so
apologies if it made
Thanks Nick, +1.
I'll try and follow and see if I can help in places.
Cheers,
Chris
On May 16, 2012, at 5:50 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've just been brainstorming with Ray Gauss, and we think we've come up with
> a way to move towards cleaner and clearer metadata property definition
