[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15656176#comment-15656176
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1541:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
`docker/build.sh -t -i -n` succeeded.
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/486
Force-pushed. Filtering steps based on 2 conditions (type and traversal
requirements) was easier than I thought (thanks to
`TraversalHelper.anyStepRecursively()`).
---
If your project is set up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655870#comment-15655870
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1545:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655826#comment-15655826
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1545:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/486
You know what, I will revert the change and not implement `PathProcessor`
in `SimplePathStep`. Here's why: `IncidentToAdjacentStrategy` should only rely
on the `getRequirements()` result, because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655821#comment-15655821
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1545:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/486
The `PathProcessor` interface has no function for SimpleStep and doesn't
add any overhead. AFAIK `PathProcessor` is only used by strategies to easily
identify traversals with "special requirement
Github user al3xandru commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478#discussion_r87521066
--- Diff: gremlin-core/pom.xml ---
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ limitations under the License.
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655730#comment-15655730
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490:
---
Github user al3xandru commented
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655657#comment-15655657
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1545:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/486
`PathProcessors` are intended for path analysis steps that use
`by()`-modulation. Also, what about `CyclicPathStep`? Perhaps just itemize
those steps explictly for now and now have them implement `
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655653#comment-15655653
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1547:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/483
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1547.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Two bugs found associated with MatchStep: Path retraction
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/486
TINKERPOP-1545 IncidentToAdjacentStrategy is buggy
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545
Made `SimplePathStep` implement `PathProcessor` and
`IncidentToAdjacentStrategy`
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655489#comment-15655489
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1545:
---
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kuppitz reassigned TINKERPOP-1545:
-
Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
> IncidentToAdjacentStrategy is buggy
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655320#comment-15655320
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1489:
---
Github user jbmusso commented o
Github user jbmusso commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/450
Ah, it looks like [nashorn supports let and const keywords on
8u40](http://fr.slideshare.net/akihironishikawa/nashorn-in-the-future-en) so we
could swap `var` for `let` and `const` unless we want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655286#comment-15655286
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490:
---
Github user aholmberg commented
Github user aholmberg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478
> the type of future returned will depend on the underlying
RemoteConnection implementation.
That depends on whether you are okay leaking remote connection
implementation through this A
I sorta share that sentiment however, I think we had that discussion back
when we determined our listing requirements and we figured we couldn't
figure out how to easily quantify "mature".
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Musso
wrote:
> Interesting thing. +1 to adding HGraphDB to t
Interesting thing. +1 to adding HGraphDB to the list.
Minor concern: I'm not sure if we want to manage a curated list of
implementations and maybe restrict to more mature projects. I'm just
thinking out loud here: I'm not targeting HGraphDB specifically (and I wish
them good luck - *cheers*). My m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655019#comment-15655019
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1547:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/483
Changes pushed. `docker/build.sh -t -i -n` succeeded.
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Hello everyone,
Robert Yokota notified us today that he has developed an
Apache TinkerPop enabled graph db: https://github.com/rayokota/hgraphdb.
Correct me if I'm wrong Robert, but it looks like it's at the TinkerPop
3.2.3 version.
I think HGraphDB meets our index listing requirements but I wante
Hi Robert,
I stumbled upon your announcement earlier today. Exciting news! It looks
like
your project meets the index listing requirements. I'm going to send
another message to dev to make sure there is consensus.
Thanks,
Ted
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Robert Yokota wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654950#comment-15654950
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490:
---
Github user davebshow commented
Github user davebshow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478
After actually thinking about this, the type of future returned will depend
on the underlying `RemoteConnection` implementation. A call to the
method`promise` will cause a `(async)traversal_str
Hi,
I wrote a TinkerPop 3 provider for HBase so it could be used as an OLTP
graph database. Would it be possible to get it added to the homepage index
listing?
https://github.com/rayokota/hgraphdb
https://rayokota.wordpress.com/2016/11/10/hgraphdb-hbase-
as-a-tinkerpop-graph-database/
Thanks,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654803#comment-15654803
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490:
---
Github user aholmberg commented
Github user aholmberg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478
Coupling the traversal API to a web framework does not seem appealing to
me. Could we consider using the [futures
backport](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/futures), which backports the Python 3
s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654712#comment-15654712
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1541:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
I'm cool with that change. I still have to run a `docker/build.sh -t -i -n`
though - will do so as soon as I have the resources available (unless someone
else volunteers).
---
If your project i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654484#comment-15654484
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1541:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
When I go to merge, I will change the method name to `selectV3d2()` so if
you want to vote :) ... Also, I think we need @dkuppitz and @robertdale
and @mhfrantz to have a look and vote too.
-
Daniel Kuppitz created TINKERPOP-1549:
-
Summary: Add more RangeStep test cases
Key: TINKERPOP-1549
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1549
Project: TinkerPop
Issue Type:
Ted Wilmes created TINKERPOP-1548:
-
Summary: Traversals can complete before interrupted in
TraversalInterruptionComputerTest
Key: TINKERPOP-1548
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1548
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654141#comment-15654141
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1547:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/483
@dkuppitz -- note that @spmallette never VOTE'd so when you are done with
your testing and updates, just VOTE and I will merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1428:
-
Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
> profile() throws NPE for union(group,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1428.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2.4
> profile() throws NPE for union
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654138#comment-15654138
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1428:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654139#comment-15654139
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478
thanks @davebshow - i might ask for your assistance on implementing that.
still trying to get it right for java. that blocking call in `RemoteStep`
stinks. having a bit of a hard time
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/481
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654133#comment-15654133
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1547:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/483
Please don't merge this PR yet. While testing the changes in
`RangeByIsCountStrategy` I realized that we can add a minor tweak to get
another great optimization. I'll push my local changes as soo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654127#comment-15654127
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490:
---
Github user davebshow commented
Github user davebshow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478
@spmallette you can easily implement something similar in Python using
Futures. Using `tornado.concurrent.Future` would probably make the most sense,
as is is already 2/3 compatible and should w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654068#comment-15654068
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1541:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
ok - if it's trivial, then perhaps not worrying about.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15654066#comment-15654066
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1541:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
The only difference is `select(Pop.mix,...)` (that is `selectV3d2()`) and
there are 6 or so tests that test it in `RangeTest` and `TailTest`. I can
explicitly make them use the method `selectV3d2()`
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15653859#comment-15653859
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1547:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/483
@twilmes can you please send some specifics on what interruption tests were
tanking on you and under what circumstances? Maybe just ping me on hipchat when
you have a moment rather than go thro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15653855#comment-15653855
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1541:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
It should be `selectV3d2()` given that it will yield backward compatibility
to 3.2.x.
Maybe I missed it, but are there any tests for `selectV3d2()` - at least
something to exercise th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15653847#comment-15653847
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1428:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/481
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
61 matches
Mail list logo