Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Release and docs looks good to me. Validating source distribution * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ...

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1627) LazyBarrierStrategy should not append an end barrier.

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1627: - Summary: LazyBarrierStrategy should not append an end barrier. Key: TINKERPOP-1627 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1627

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1626) choose() is buggy in OLAP

Daniel Kuppitz created TINKERPOP-1626: - Summary: choose() is buggy in OLAP Key: TINKERPOP-1626 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1626 Project: TinkerPop Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after Jason's email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the 08/02/2017 so things changed. Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. Next time I'll pull the

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1625) Improvements to has() related steps

stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1625: --- Summary: Improvements to has() related steps Key: TINKERPOP-1625 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1625 Project: TinkerPop

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Hi, > The significant change is > ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at 12:44 AM Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a refactor

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

The significant change is ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at 12:44 AM The description is "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() which will either append a HasStep with container or if the traverasl ends with a HasContainerHolder, fold the container into the

Re: static code in TinkerPop

Hey, > I have recently found a bug in Sqlg related to the static nature of > strategies. > > In particular it is happening for me on the PathRetractionStep but it > probably a general issue. > > Sqlg supports running many graphs in one JVM. > > The staticness confuses the state of the

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Hello Pieter, The “has” changes were a confusion over the last 2 releases where the semantic interpretation of arrays and collections were being challenged and then reverted. However, that was a few releases ago, not this release. There were discussions on the topic back then too. Marko.

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in after 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph providers who tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff:

RE: static code in TinkerPop

Hi, I have recently found a bug in Sqlg related to the static nature of strategies. In particular it is happening for me on the PathRetractionStep but it probably a general issue. Sqlg supports running many graphs in one JVM. The staticness confuses the state of the strategies when they

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Hi, Some issues regarding the release process. On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. I then started testing and found almost no issues. However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4. To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found the

Re: Site organization, including links to recipes and various tutorials

One idea I've had is to better cross reference our docs. More links between the different documents we have would be helpful. For example, when we mention a particular step somewhere in a recpie or tutorial, do a link to the step in the reference docs. For each step in the reference docs have a

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

- Successfully tested Python driver (Goblin) against binary server zip - Built the source zip/tested gremlin-python with: mvn clean install && mvn verify -pl gremlin-python - BUILD SUCCESS - Ran the validate script: $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.4 Validating binary distributions *