[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-2591) Administrative adjustments to gremlint site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Øyvind Sæbø reassigned TINKERPOP-2591: -- Assignee: Øyvind Sæbø > Administrative adjustments to gremlint site >

RE: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.4.12 Release

VOTE +! Cheers, Kelvin From: Joshua Shinavier Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 1:10 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.4.12 Release +1 On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:06 AM David Bechberger wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:02 AM Stephen Mallette > wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] datetime

I think that works so long as there is a common type which would exist in each GLV and which datetime() would parse *to*. This type could then be mapped into GLV-native types as desired. An easy choice for the common type would be 64-bit Unix timestamps in milliseconds, but this does not capture

[DISCUSS] Geo-Spatial support

One of the common requests from customers and users of TinkerPop is to add support for geographic based searches (TINKERPOP-2558 ). In fact many TinkerPop enabled database vendors such as DataStax Graph and JanusGraph have added custom

[DISCUSS] gremlin-annotations

A while ago someone add this item to JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2411 which recommended moving the DSL related annotations to their own module, which would take with it the javapoet dependency and turn off annotation processing given usage of gremlin-core. Since

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.5.1 Release

VOTE +1 > 22. jul. 2021 kl. 20:08 skrev Joshua Shinavier : > > +1 > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:41 AM David Bechberger > wrote: > >> Agreed, thanks for all the hard work. +1 >> >> We should probably include something about Discord in any sort of email >> communication as well. >> >>

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.4.12 Release

+1 On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:06 AM David Bechberger wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:02 AM Stephen Mallette > wrote: > > > Docs look good and validate-distribution.sh passed > > > > VOTE +1 > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 5:01 AM Florian Hockmann > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.5.1 Release

+1 On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:41 AM David Bechberger wrote: > Agreed, thanks for all the hard work. +1 > > We should probably include something about Discord in any sort of email > communication as well. > > Thanks, > Dave > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 8:27 AM Kelvin Lawrence > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.4.12 Release

+1 On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:02 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > Docs look good and validate-distribution.sh passed > > VOTE +1 > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 5:01 AM Florian Hockmann > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.4.12 is ready for release. > > > > The

Re: [DISCUSS] remove groovy from gremlin-driver

The issues with Groovy are clearly ongoing and this change does serve to generally reduce its footprint in TinkerPop. I am concerned that if we can't get off of Groovy 2.x we're eventually going to reach a point where we're blocked by the JDK (i.e. –illegal-access=permit goes away soon enough) or

Re: [DISCUSS] datetime

+1 from me as well. On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Kelvin Lawrence wrote: > A big +1 from me for this. As much as possible making Gremlin a language > that does not depend on closures for things like dates and string > manipulation will help with parity when compared to other query languages.

Re: [DISCUSS] remove groovy from gremlin-driver

Is reason for removing it is that this underlying groovy issue ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9785) is blocking the upgrade? On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 9:40 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > In 3.6.0 I think it worth taking the step to remove all groovy dependencies > from

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.5.1 Release

Agreed, thanks for all the hard work. +1 We should probably include something about Discord in any sort of email communication as well. Thanks, Dave On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 8:27 AM Kelvin Lawrence wrote: > Thanks for all the hard work to get the release out. VOTE +1 > Kelvin > On

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-2373) Bump to Groovy 3.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stephen Mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-2373: --- Assignee: (was: Stephen Mallette) > Bump to Groovy 3.0 >

[DISCUSS] remove groovy from gremlin-driver

In 3.6.0 I think it worth taking the step to remove all groovy dependencies from gremlin-driver. They were made in 3.5.0 and based on there being no replies to this query on usage of the feature related to this dependency: https://groups.google.com/g/gremlin-users/c/vFPNwbHFl4w/m/U11fOLhWAgAJ I

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-2593) Remove Groovy as a dependency from gremlin-driver

Stephen Mallette created TINKERPOP-2593: --- Summary: Remove Groovy as a dependency from gremlin-driver Key: TINKERPOP-2593 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2593 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2504) Intermittently failing server/driver integration tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17385682#comment-17385682 ] Stephen Mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2504: - Formulated another possible fix for this

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-2553) Intermittently failing Kerberos tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stephen Mallette closed TINKERPOP-2553. --- Resolution: Duplicate > Intermittently failing Kerberos tests >

Re: [DISCUSS] datetime

A big +1 from me for this. As much as possible making Gremlin a language that does not depend on closures for things like dates and string manipulation will help with parity when compared to other query languages. Kelvin On Wednesday, July 21, 2021, 07:49:17 AM CDT, Stephen Mallette

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.5.1 Release

Thanks for all the hard work to get the release out. VOTE +1 Kelvin On Wednesday, July 21, 2021, 01:00:34 PM CDT, Stephen Mallette wrote: It was an unfortunate omission but we probably should have had the gremlint library in the 3.5.1 upgrade docs. oh well, not something to retrigger

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2591) Administrative adjustments to gremlint site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17385386#comment-17385386 ] Stephen Mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2591: - it's ok if you don't want to include the

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2591) Administrative adjustments to gremlint site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17385290#comment-17385290 ] Øyvind Sæbø commented on TINKERPOP-2591: Yes, we can pin the gremlint website to a particular