or some insight for when 3.2.4 will release. It looks like
>>> voting closes tomorrow. Is that on schedule, and if so what's a typical
>> ETA
>>> for binaries to be posted?
>>>
>>> I don't know if my vote counts, but FTW!
>>>
>>>
aul
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 7:03 AM
> > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
> >
> > validate-distrib
---Original Message-
> From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 7:03 AM
> To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
>
> validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work
>
tephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 7:03 AM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work on
this one Jason. nice job
VOTE: +1
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22
validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work on
this one Jason. nice job
VOTE: +1
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote:
> Release and docs looks good to me.
>
> Validating source distribution
>
> * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2
Release and docs looks good to me.
Validating source distribution
* downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK
* validating signatures and checksums ...
* PGP signature ... OK
* MD5 checksum ... OK
* SHA1 checksum ... OK
* unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ...
Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after Jason's
email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there.
They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the 08/02/2017 so
things changed.
Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing.
Next time I'll pull the c
Hi,
> The significant change is
> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at 12:44 AM
Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — has-containers
and arrays/collections handling.
> I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a refactor on
> my side as it cha
The significant change is
ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at 12:44 AM
The description is
"added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() which will either append a
HasStep with container or if the traverasl ends with a
HasContainerHolder, fold the container into the holder. This just makes
th
Hello Pieter,
The “has” changes were a confusion over the last 2 releases where the semantic
interpretation of arrays and collections were being challenged and then
reverted. However, that was a few releases ago, not this release. There were
discussions on the topic back then too.
Marko.
http
Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and
HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in after
2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph providers who
tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff:
https://githu
Hi,
Some issues regarding the release process.
On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released.
I then started testing and found almost no issues.
However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4.
To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found
the sa
- Successfully tested Python driver (Goblin) against binary server zip
- Built the source zip/tested gremlin-python with:
mvn clean install && mvn verify -pl gremlin-python - BUILD SUCCESS
- Ran the validate script:
$ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.4
Validating binary distributions
* downlo
*Validating binary distributions*
* downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
(apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip)... OK
* validating signatures and checksums ...
* PGP signature ... OK
* MD5 checksum ... OK
* SHA1 checksum ... OK
* unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK
* validati
14 matches
Mail list logo
