[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP3-952) Include Cardinality.list example in VertexProperty section of main docs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes closed TINKERPOP3-952. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.1.1-incubating > Include Cardinality.list example in

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-952) Include Cardinality.list example in VertexProperty section of main docs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035140#comment-15035140 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-952: --- Github user asfgit closed the p

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-952 Adding example of...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/157 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fe

Re: [DISCUSS] supportsSchema Feature

NVM, it was my bad... I was starting transaction automatically, and that was creating problems... On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Marvin, can you please elaborate? Is there a particular test that's > causing a problem where supportsSchema() could help make something e

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop junit-benchmarks

Yup :) On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:40 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > Yeah, i think that's a bit too heavy and coarse grained for our purposes. > I was thinking more in terms of micro-benchmarks for our internal use. > > Btw, Is your implementation such that any TP3 compliant database could work > wit

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP3-988. - Resolution: Fixed > SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commo

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change GraphCompu...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/164 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fe

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035051#comment-15035051 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user asfgit closed the p

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035043#comment-15035043 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user spmallette commente

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change GraphCompu...

Github user spmallette commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/164#issuecomment-161147861 Reviewed the code and had discussed it with @dalaro earlier this morning. based on others successfully running tests: +1 --- If your project is set up

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-952) Include Cardinality.list example in VertexProperty section of main docs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035030#comment-15035030 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-952: --- Github user okram commented on

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-952 Adding example of...

Github user okram commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/157#issuecomment-161146544 This has 3 +1 VOTES. @twilmes -- do you plan to merge this into master/? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your repl

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-575) Consider implementing a RemoteGraph

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035024#comment-15035024 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-575: --- I explain in https://is

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034941#comment-15034941 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/2/15 12:31 AM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034941#comment-15034941 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/2/15 12:29 AM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034941#comment-15034941 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/2/15 12:25 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1014) Get rid of Traverser species and TraverserRequirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034952#comment-15034952 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-1014: What do you mean "Af

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034941#comment-15034941 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/2/15 12:21 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034941#comment-15034941 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-971: --- I think we can get rid

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1014) Get rid of Traverser species and TraverserRequirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034921#comment-15034921 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP3-1014: Just ran a quick and dirty test usin

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034802#comment-15034802 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/1/15 11:11 PM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034802#comment-15034802 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/1/15 11:11 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1014) Get rid of Traverser species and TraverserRequirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034810#comment-15034810 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-1014: This has been pushed

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034802#comment-15034802 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/1/15 11:05 PM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034802#comment-15034802 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/1/15 11:01 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034802#comment-15034802 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-971: --- This is how things shou

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP3-971) TraversalSource should be fluent like GraphComputer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034802#comment-15034802 ] Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP3-971 at 12/1/15 11:02 PM: ---

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP3-886) Allow any GraphReader/Writer to be persistence engine for TinkerGraph

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-886. --- Resolution: Implemented > Allow any GraphReader/Writer to be persistence engine fo

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP3-996) Please delete old releases from mirroring system

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-996. --- Resolution: Done all old releases have been removed - just left 3.0.2-incubating a

Titan 1.0 Data Migration Tutorial

I mentioned this on the Aurelius Graphs mailing list, but Daniel Kuppitz and I put together a tutorial on how to do a data migration from Titan 0.5.x to Titan 1.0.0. You can find it here: https://github.com/dkuppitz/openflights Even if you don't use Titan, ,you might find it interesting as it sh

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1013) Traverser tags as a safer way of using path labels

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034506#comment-15034506 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1013: GitHub user okram opened a p

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-1013: Traverser tags ...

GitHub user okram opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/165 TINKERPOP3-1013: Traverser tags as a safer way of using path labels https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1013 We have had a hack in `MatchStep` this whole time where w

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP3-1014) Get rid of Traverser species and TraverserRequirements

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP3-1014: -- Summary: Get rid of Traverser species and TraverserRequirements Key: TINKERPOP3-1014 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1014 Pro

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-993) cyclicPath is not(simplePath)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034426#comment-15034426 ] Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP3-993: --- Same thing as with {{repeat().t

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-993) cyclicPath is not(simplePath)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034421#comment-15034421 ] Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP3-993: --- The difference is significant,

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP3-1009) Add a CAUTION to documentation about HadoopGraph and getting back elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP3-1009: -- Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > Add a CAUTION to documentation abou

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP3-1013) Traverser tags as a safer way of using path labels

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP3-1013: -- Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > Traverser tags as a safer way of us

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-993) cyclicPath is not(simplePath)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034332#comment-15034332 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-993: --- [~dkuppitz] what do you

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP3-1001) SugarLoaderPerformanceTest contains hardcoded vertex ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP3-1001. -- Resolution: Fixed This was merged a while back. JIRA ticket never closed.

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP3-1001) SugarLoaderPerformanceTest contains hardcoded vertex ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP3-1001: -- Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > SugarLoaderPerformanceTest contains

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034299#comment-15034299 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1012: Github user asfgit closed th

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Kuppitz closed TINKERPOP3-1012. -- Resolution: Fixed > BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Lon

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-1012 generalize BLVP ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/163 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fe

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change GraphCompu...

Github user twilmes commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/164#issuecomment-161052226 Code looks good and integration tests pass for me. VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply a

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034247#comment-15034247 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user twilmes commented o

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP3-1013) Traverser tags as a safer way of using path labels

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP3-1013: -- Summary: Traverser tags as a safer way of using path labels Key: TINKERPOP3-1013 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1013 Project

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP3-958) Improve usability of .profile() step.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP3-958: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.1-incubating) 3.2.0-incubatin

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-958) Improve usability of .profile() step.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034188#comment-15034188 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-958: --- This will be a breaking

Re: TinkerPop and Non-JVM-Based Graph Databases

That does look like a good option. Also, I'm not familiar with these but for the sake of being thorough: can anything be done on the DLL (windows) + shared library (unix) front? These will be so much more of a headache than what James just linked (if even do-able, IDK) but thought I would bring it

Re: TinkerPop and Non-JVM-Based Graph Databases

https://twitter.com/twarko/status/671744135091589120 BAM. Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Dec 1, 2015, at 10:08 AM, James Thornton wrote: > Via gRPC (http://www.grpc.io). > > See > http://googledevelopers.blogspot.com/2015/02/introducing-grpc-new-open-source-http2.html > > - James > >

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change GraphCompu...

Github user okram commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/164#issuecomment-161040151 I ran full integration tests and everything passed. VOTE +1. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034125#comment-15034125 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user okram commented on

Re: TinkerPop and Non-JVM-Based Graph Databases

Via gRPC (http://www.grpc.io). See http://googledevelopers.blogspot.com/2015/02/introducing-grpc-new-open-source-http2.html - James On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, > > I just saw this tweet: > https://twitter.com/manishrjain/status/671557828520181762 >

TinkerPop and Non-JVM-Based Graph Databases

Hello, I just saw this tweet: https://twitter.com/manishrjain/status/671557828520181762 Lets say this guy wanted to make DGraph TinkerPop-compliant. How would he go about doing this? The only way I can think is that the "Blueprints API" (Graph/Vertex/Edge) would make server calls on eac

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034027#comment-15034027 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1012: Github user spmallette comme

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-1012 generalize BLVP ...

Github user spmallette commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/163#issuecomment-161025888 VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033999#comment-15033999 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1012: Github user dkuppitz comment

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-1012 generalize BLVP ...

Github user dkuppitz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/163#issuecomment-161022782 Yep, will do. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033962#comment-15033962 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1012: Github user okram commented

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-1012 generalize BLVP ...

Github user okram commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/163#issuecomment-161016243 Easy enough. VOTE +1. @dkuppitz -- when we get the third VOTE, can you be responsible for merging to master/ and CHANGELOG stuffs? --- If your pro

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033906#comment-15033906 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1012: Github user dkuppitz comment

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-1012 generalize BLVP ...

Github user dkuppitz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/163#issuecomment-161006503 Yep, that's how it should be. VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[DISCUSS] Add native CSV loading support for gremlin (GraphReader)

Adding support for loading CSV into a graph using Gremlin's GraphReader will lower the entry barrier for new users. A lot of data is already in CSV format and a lot of existing databases/repositories allow users to export their data as CSV. I'd like to add this capability to the gremlin core as a

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033843#comment-15033843 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user dalaro commented on

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change GraphCompu...

Github user dalaro commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/164#issuecomment-160997857 I forgot to mention: I also fixed the variable name typo in #154. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appe

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033825#comment-15033825 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- GitHub user dalaro opened a pul

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change SparkGraph...

Github user dalaro commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/154#issuecomment-160992073 This is superseded by https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/164. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change GraphCompu...

GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/164 TINKERPOP3-988 Change GraphComputer executors This supersedes https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/154. This PR is similar to its predecessor, but with two differen

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033826#comment-15033826 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user dalaro commented on

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033822#comment-15033822 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1012: GitHub user dalaro opened a

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-1012 generalize BLVP ...

GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/163 TINKERPOP3-1012 generalize BLVP vertex id types Change the type of two vertex ID variable declarations from Long to Object. As mentioned in the JIRA, his should be reviewed. I'm not su

Re: Bug in Gremlin driver serialization

nice catch Jason! On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > Isn't this fixed already? See Stephen's commits on September 11, 2015. > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/commits/3.0.2-incubating/gremlin-driver/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/driver/ser/GryoMes

Re: Bug in Gremlin driver serialization

Isn't this fixed already? See Stephen's commits on September 11, 2015. https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/commits/3.0.2-incubating/gremlin-driver/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/driver/ser/GryoMessageSerializerV1d0.java On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Dylan Millikin wrote:

Re: Bug in Gremlin driver serialization

Hi Stéphane, Thanks for the feedback. I haven't had the time to take a deeper look but a 5mn googlefu gave me this which might (or might not) be a lead: https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo/issues/336 If we set a failing test we can maybe see if those changes are relevant or not. Do you want

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop junit-benchmarks

We haven't run tests between releases precisely because it is "tricky getting usable numbers for comparison". the existing tests were fairly arbitrary in how they were selected - i was mostly trying to develop a model we could follow. i wasn't really trying too hard to do much else. > To start o

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop junit-benchmarks

I think the move to JMH is a good idea. How have you guys been using the existing tests? For example, have you generated the reports at various points and then done comparisons between releases? It would be neat to have the tests run along with the Travis build but it could be tricky getting usab

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP3-1012: --- Fix Version/s: 3.1.1-incubating > BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assum

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP3-1012: --- Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz > BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume verte

Bug in Gremlin driver serialization

Hi everybody, Our company is developing a system based on Gremlin server and we are facing an issue for which, I think, I have identified the root cause. Our problem occurs when requesting a graph that returns beyond a certain amount of data, actually 4096 bytes, through a websocket connection.

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033641#comment-15033641 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user dalaro commented on

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change SparkGraph...

Github user dalaro commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/154#issuecomment-160962223 I'll open a new PR. Don't merge this one. I extracted the common executor-related logic into a helper shared between the Giraph and Spark computers, but m

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-988) SparkGraphComputer.submit shouldn't use ForkJoinPool.commonPool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033636#comment-15033636 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988: --- Github user dalaro closed the p

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-988 Change SparkGraph...

Github user dalaro closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/154 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fe

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP3-1012) BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long

Dan LaRocque created TINKERPOP3-1012: Summary: BulkLoaderVertexProgram shouldn't assume vertex IDs of type Long Key: TINKERPOP3-1012 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1012 Proj

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-995) Add Authenticator.newSaslNegotiator(InetAddress)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033583#comment-15033583 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-995: --- GitHub user spmallette opened a

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP3-995 Add Authenticator...

GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/162 TINKERPOP3-995 Add Authenticator.newSaslNegotiator(InetAddress) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-995 This change is non-breaking despite the deprecation. Revi

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop junit-benchmarks

Yeah, i think that's a bit too heavy and coarse grained for our purposes. I was thinking more in terms of micro-benchmarks for our internal use. Btw, Is your implementation such that any TP3 compliant database could work with the LDBC? On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Jonathan Ellithorpe wrote: